The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
Moderator: Referees
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16115
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
Seabrook gets 3 games for his hit on Backes. I'm ok with that but given his whining when he gets hit and the history of that entire team, five would have been a more sufficient suspension.
The only HW the Canucks need
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
Like I said in the Playoff thread, I'm okay with that suspension.Hockey Widow wrote:Seabrook gets 3 games for his hit on Backes. I'm ok with that but given his whining when he gets hit and the history of that entire team, five would have been a more sufficient suspension.
Seabrook is a big part of the Hawks, and they could (Spaghetti Monster willing) be eliminated while he's suspended. If playoff games are worth more than Regular Season games, then this is probably a 5-6 game regular season suspension.
Expect (and hope) St Louis to hammer away even harder on Duncan "Swing for through the Bone" Keith.
- ClamRussel
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3992
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: New South Wales, Australia
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
How about this beaut!
5+game for elbowing....a headshot that ended Alberts' season, maybe his career = NO suspension!!!
http://www.theprovince.com/touch/sports ... rel=894638
5+game for elbowing....a headshot that ended Alberts' season, maybe his career = NO suspension!!!
http://www.theprovince.com/touch/sports ... rel=894638
"Once a King, always a King" -Mike Murphy
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16115
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
I remember that clearly and bountiful afterwRds talking about Alberts diving. I never understood how that wasn't a suspension. For Alberts, probably the end of his career.
The only HW the Canucks need
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:20 pm
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
I agree HW. I remember that game clearly. Is it just me or did Calgary make a consistent and conserted effort to injure opposing players this year. I get wanting to play a "truclent" style but come on. You still need to play something the vaguely resembles hockey.
I hope Calgary rejoins the league as a "hockey" team and drops the imperative to injure that seems to have been their play style in 2013/14.
Just my $0.02
I hope Calgary rejoins the league as a "hockey" team and drops the imperative to injure that seems to have been their play style in 2013/14.
Just my $0.02
- ClamRussel
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3992
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: New South Wales, Australia
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
So where was Shanahan in all that?wafflecombine wrote:I agree HW. I remember that game clearly. Is it just me or did Calgary make a consistent and conserted effort to injure opposing players this year. I get wanting to play a "truclent" style but come on. You still need to play something the vaguely resembles hockey.
I hope Calgary rejoins the league as a "hockey" team and drops the imperative to injure that seems to have been their play style in 2013/14.
Just my $0.02
"Once a King, always a King" -Mike Murphy
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
shanahan turned out to be an idiot.
All I see when watching hockey is that if a player goes down, it "must" have been a penalty.. who's the closest nearby?
A great HARD hit where a player goes down must have been a head shot/interference/boarding. Not only does the drama of the hit play a role, but even the players themselves don't seem to like clean hits.
I just hate it.
All I see when watching hockey is that if a player goes down, it "must" have been a penalty.. who's the closest nearby?
A great HARD hit where a player goes down must have been a head shot/interference/boarding. Not only does the drama of the hit play a role, but even the players themselves don't seem to like clean hits.
I just hate it.
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
What's the Over-Under on Matt Cooke's upcomming suspension for ending Tyson Barrie's season with a knee-on-knee hit?
I'll say 15.
He's totalled 27 games worth of suspensions (last one was 17 for an elbow vs. New York) in his career.
I'll say 15.
He's totalled 27 games worth of suspensions (last one was 17 for an elbow vs. New York) in his career.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20437
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
Look at the fanbase HW. They had an interactive tv spot on Bingo's website with the posters of the site and the clowns were wearing leather fedoras, bolo ties, dress shirts with 1/2 inch vertical piping. The ones who had teeth looked like an East Van hooker with a grill full of impetigo. THAT is Bountiful. They are Prince George with a mullet. The number one bar in Crackalgary used to be the Back Alley. It would compare to Friscos, Tabascos, the Turf or the Falmingo for you 40's crew.Hockey Widow wrote:I remember that clearly and bountiful afterwRds talking about Alberts diving. I never understood how that wasn't a suspension. For Alberts, probably the end of his career.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
The turf or the flamingo would have kicked the Bountifulls out for lack of IQ.
- BurningBeard
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:02 pm
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
I think he gets 5 or less.Island Nucklehead wrote:What's the Over-Under on Matt Cooke's upcomming suspension for ending Tyson Barrie's season with a knee-on-knee hit?
I'll say 15.
He's totalled 27 games worth of suspensions (last one was 17 for an elbow vs. New York) in his career.
Didn't he knee a Dallas player last month? I don't even think he was fined for it.
Every time I look out my window, same three dogs looking back at me.
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
Bountiful spends a lot of time bitching about officiating.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:20 pm
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
10 games and only that much because of his record.
Though it would be interesting if they handed him a Torres style suspension.
Though it would be interesting if they handed him a Torres style suspension.
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
I'm kind of thinking they will go closer to Torres territory. Barrie is likely done for the playoffs, and Cooke already has a 17 game suspension on his resume (10+first round, which went the distance). The "repeat offender" tag doesn't apply in the duration of the suspension, only how they calculate the money he loses, and is thus inconsequential in the playoffs. Given Cooke's vast history of dirty plays, I think the league will really bury him.wafflecombine wrote:10 games and only that much because of his record.
Though it would be interesting if they handed him a Torres style suspension.
- ClamRussel
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3992
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:50 am
- Location: New South Wales, Australia
Re: The (in)Consistency of NHL Officiating [aka WTH?!?]
The Cooke hit isn't any worse than the intentional (but un-suspended) Brown hit you posted on the previous page. He even takes an elbow swing for his head. Brown's got to be one of the craftiest of the dirty players in the league (see his unintentional-on-purpose launch into Luongo...followed by a guilt ridden glance over to see his accomplishment). Always seems to get away w/ it somehow.Island Nucklehead wrote:I'm kind of thinking they will go closer to Torres territory. Barrie is likely done for the playoffs, and Cooke already has a 17 game suspension on his resume (10+first round, which went the distance). The "repeat offender" tag doesn't apply in the duration of the suspension, only how they calculate the money he loses, and is thus inconsequential in the playoffs. Given Cooke's vast history of dirty plays, I think the league will really bury him.wafflecombine wrote:10 games and only that much because of his record.
Though it would be interesting if they handed him a Torres style suspension.
"Once a King, always a King" -Mike Murphy