1 out of 3.....not bad for you.RoyalDude wrote:AV? Raymond? Edler?Mëds wrote: Point the finger where it should be pointed.
I'm thinking Burrows, Sedin, Edler, Hamhuis, Hansen, Garrison.....for starters.
Moderator: Referees
1 out of 3.....not bad for you.RoyalDude wrote:AV? Raymond? Edler?Mëds wrote: Point the finger where it should be pointed.
I'll send you some ass wipesdhabums wrote:I'll send you my 3 yo's unused pull ups for $20.RoyalDude wrote:dhabums, I can lend you some money.
Mëds wrote:1 out of 3.....not bad for you.RoyalDude wrote:AV? Raymond? Edler?Mëds wrote: Point the finger where it should be pointed.
I'm thinking Burrows, Sedin, Edler, Hamhuis, Hansen, Garrison.....for starters.
RoyalDude wrote:This is AV's faultdhabums wrote:How did Mike Gillis not put that in?
Actually, no. Pessimists and optimists have the same amount of shite happening to them, but the optimists are happier in between. And to top it off, optimists tend to live longer. Worrying too much about things you can't fix anyway really wears you down. Thus rose coloured spectacles is a far better strategy than bed wetting!RoyalDude wrote:It's basically this - The denial crew vs the urine crew.
Being a urinator is justifiable. Being a rose coloured spectacle wearing member of the denial crew is, well, kinda sad
No ones in denial fucktard, we know we are playing bad right now just as we knew we were playing great in December.RoyalDude wrote:It's basically this - The denial crew vs the urine crew.
Being a urinator is justifiable. Being a rose coloured spectacle wearing member of the denial crew is, well, kinda sad
mathonwy wrote:I think the problem is our defense, not our forwards.
Our ability to get the puck into the Hawk's zone with speed is non-existent.
And that was a brutal give away in the Hawk zone by Kesler
Oh, in that case, carry on.mathonwy wrote:Well, if we had a Oliver Ekman Larsson or a Nick Lidstrom skating the puck up, then none of those forwards you mentioned would need to.
I'm trolling Mëds. This team is fucked.