I'm better at running my mouth on a message board than that Susan Alexander broad was at singing arias, that's for sureStrangelove wrote:

Moderator: Referees
I'm better at running my mouth on a message board than that Susan Alexander broad was at singing arias, that's for sureStrangelove wrote:
Indubitably.ClamRussel wrote:LoL, oh ya. Did they flip a coin to determine who was first?Strangelove wrote:The first fight is allowed.ClamRussel wrote: Ok, a line brawl and the 2 biggest goons on the ice are the only 2 who DON'T get kicked out?
Any explanation for that?![]()
NHL logic?
Any additional fights at the same time results in ejaculation... errr ejection.
Just keep doing what you're doing good buddy!dbr wrote: I'm better at running my mouth on a message board than that Susan Alexander broad was at singing arias, that's for sure
Alleged involvement? Link? Source?ClamRussel wrote:What will be interesting is how the league handles Hartley and Burke's alleged involvement in this spectacle. Buffalo coach was fined for doing the same thing Hartley did.
Well two Flames had to change their jerseys in the penalty box for being blood soaked before one of those two was sent to the showers. The Flame who stayed in the game had to change his jersey again later in the game for the same reason.Hockey Widow wrote:But perhaps we should have saved those ice scrapings so DNA tests could have been done to see who's blood it is. Pretty sure it was Flame blood spoiling the ice
Clam continues in his failure to understand the rules of the game.Strangelove wrote:The first fight is allowed.ClamRussel wrote: Ok, a line brawl and the 2 biggest goons on the ice are the only 2 who DON'T get kicked out?
Any explanation for that?![]()
NHL logic?
Any additional fights at the same time results in ejaculation... errr ejection.
Troller again fails in his ability to comprehend. My point was there appeared to be a lot of simultaneous fighting occurring. It wasn't like there was a initial fight in the bunch. But feel free to ignore that. Give you more time to jerk off to the CBA.Topper wrote:Clam continues in his failure to understand the rules of the game.Strangelove wrote:The first fight is allowed.ClamRussel wrote: Ok, a line brawl and the 2 biggest goons on the ice are the only 2 who DON'T get kicked out?
Any explanation for that?![]()
NHL logic?
Any additional fights at the same time results in ejaculation... errr ejection.
TSN brought it up a couple times. They spoke about it like it was understood among the insiders. Who knows what really transpired. Today they said if Burke didn't influence that starting lineup, that Hartley would have known BB's history w/ Aquilini/Gillis; alluding he'd want to impress the new boss. Probably just bs media drama.Meds wrote:Alleged involvement? Link? Source?ClamRussel wrote:What will be interesting is how the league handles Hartley and Burke's alleged involvement in this spectacle. Buffalo coach was fined for doing the same thing Hartley did.
Ironically I think they still got it wrong. I don't think anyone engaged faster than Westgarth off the draw.Topper wrote:Clam continues in his failure to understand the rules of the game.Strangelove wrote:The first fight is allowed.ClamRussel wrote: Ok, a line brawl and the 2 biggest goons on the ice are the only 2 who DON'T get kicked out?
Any explanation for that?![]()
NHL logic?
Any additional fights at the same time results in ejaculation... errr ejection.
You are correct tops I thought the initial aggression was what we looked for. They did disengageTopper wrote:Come on folks, do any of you actually watch the games?
Westgarth goes after Bieksa, however KB3 does not drop the gloves or his stick and the two are easily separated by an official without any punches thrown. It is very clear that Sestito and McGratton were the first combatants The ref's got it correct and it was an easy call to make.
Of coarse I am.rats19 wrote:You are correct tops