LOL, simple is as simple does eh Reef?Reefer2 wrote: I am tired of the "bed wetters" BS what does it mean anyways?
Canucks lose, fans get upset.
Canucks win, fans happy
Nothing more nothing less.
GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Moderator: Referees
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42970
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42970
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
I’m guessing you have a bright-orange penis.mathonwy wrote:
Sometimes, you just want to clear your outlook, bring out a bag of cheetos and watch some asian lesbian porn.
Well Reef?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- The Brown Knight
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:42 am
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
I think one reason why people keep giving Bible Boy so many chances, is because of his potential and past success. It wasn't too long ago where he netted (30?) in one season I believe. Believe it or not, he was actually being considered for the 2010 US Olympic team if I recall correctly.RoyalDude wrote:What's even more confounding caped crusader with Mumbai lineage is the constant lifesavers the CC'ers keep tossing ole Boothy there, the love for Goliath around here is perplexing. Some even suggested recently that the Canucks should not buy out ole Boothy this summer but keep him here next season. What the?
Having said that - I certainly don't think he's worth the 4.5 mill, and would also be happy to see him get bought out.
One thought, since we were discussing Evander Kane earlier.
Would you do a Shinkaruk, Horvat, and Booth deal for Kane?
The Jets get our two prized prospects, and take on salary.
The Canucks dump salary, and add an immediate impact player........while also retaining all immediate impact players (I.e. Edler, Hansen, Kassian, etc.)
Canucks farm takes a massive hit, but the trade off is that we are a far better team short term.
"I post the Brown Way" ~ Connor McHindu"
The Dark Indian Rises
The Dark Indian Rises
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42970
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
I use the archives to point out your flip-flopping simply for the sake of the archives.RoyalDude wrote: I don't think much about past postings, I am not very loyal to them. I'm always moving forward. This is the very thing that drives Doc 'archivist' Strangelove crazy about me.
Your claim that proof of your flip-flopping doesn't fizz on you is simply more fodder for future archivists.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- The Brown Knight
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:42 am
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Reefer,Reefer2 wrote:Me 4ukcanuck wrote:me three,rats19 wrote:^^
Add my name to that list..lol
I always imagine the beer can stack crashing to the ground in the RD household every time the christian adonis graces the screen haha
Booth scored - RD disappears
Booth screws up and Christians through out the world duck for cover.
No offense, but you're almost as bad in a lot of ways.
Every time the Canucks lose in the playoffs, you are always in favor of quote unquote BLOWING UP THE CORE and REBUILDING.
For the life of me, I still don't get how you are/were in favor of rebuilding back in 2010. Even after 2011 where we came within ONE GAME of winning the cup, you stand by what you said.
I don't get your stance.
"I post the Brown Way" ~ Connor McHindu"
The Dark Indian Rises
The Dark Indian Rises
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42970
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
LOL, contemplating a trade for a change TBK?The Brown Knight wrote: Would you do a Shinkaruk, Horvat, and Booth deal for Kane?
Canuckscorner needs a Trade Rumours Forum.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- The Brown Knight
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:42 am
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Who me?!?Strangelove wrote:LOL, contemplating a trade for a change TBK?The Brown Knight wrote: Would you do a Shinkaruk, Horvat, and Booth deal for Kane?
Canuckscorner needs a Trade Rumours Forum.
I've had a bulge in my nether-regions ever since I read HW's rumour of Gillis going hard after E.Kane.
"I post the Brown Way" ~ Connor McHindu"
The Dark Indian Rises
The Dark Indian Rises
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
You're supposed to call a doctor if those things last more than 4 hours.The Brown Knight wrote:I've had a bulge in my nether-regions ever since I read HW's rumour of Gillis going hard after E.Kane.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
When you are single, there is no one to blame those wet sheets on.Reefer2 wrote:I am tired of the "bed wetters" BS what does it mean anyways?
Canucks lose, fans get upset.
Canucks win, fans happy
Nothing more nothing less.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
-
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:07 am
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Island Nucklehead wrote:You're supposed to call a doctor if those things last more than 4 hours.The Brown Knight wrote:I've had a bulge in my nether-regions ever since I read HW's rumour of Gillis going hard after E.Kane.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Like a goldfish.RoyalDude wrote:I don't think much about past postings, I am not very loyal to them. I'm always moving forward.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Strangelove wrote: I’m guessing you have a bright-orange penis.
Topper wrote: When you are single, there is no one to blame those wet sheets on.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
I am a simple manStrangelove wrote:LOL, simple is as simple does eh Reef?Reefer2 wrote: I am tired of the "bed wetters" BS what does it mean anyways?
Canucks lose, fans get upset.
Canucks win, fans happy
Nothing more nothing less.
Sex
Hockey
Beer
And not always in that order but if i get all 3 in the same night I am happy.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
Pick your comments don’t you.The Brown Knight wrote: Reefer,
No offense, but you're almost as bad in a lot of ways.
Every time the Canucks lose in the playoffs, you are always in favor of quote unquote BLOWING UP THE CORE and REBUILDING.
For the life of me, I still don't get how you are/were in favor of rebuilding back in 2010. Even after 2011 where we came within ONE GAME of winning the cup, you stand by what you said.
I don't get your stance.
I said a change is needed and to the core.
I don’t need to elaborate on this because any fan of this team who has watched them over the past several seasons knows what is missing from this team. To get something good you need to give up something good. Unlike others I don’t have any particular attachment to any player on this team, I cheer for the Vancouver Canucks not the name on the back.
Re: GDT Canucks at blahkcocks TSN 4:30 pm
I get it now, sorry a little slow, could not figure out the connection between an orange penis and cheetos.....Strangelove wrote:I’m guessing you have a bright-orange penis.mathonwy wrote:
Sometimes, you just want to clear your outlook, bring out a bag of cheetos and watch some asian lesbian porn.
Well Reef?
I had a comment but in the true Christmas season I will not say anthing except it is better to give and not get.