Boothy missed in the shootout?RoyalDude wrote:I'm struggling to be negative

Great game in Chi-town
Tough stretch for all the bed-wetters, they must have a pretty bad urinary blockage by now.

Moderator: Referees
Boothy missed in the shootout?RoyalDude wrote:I'm struggling to be negative
I am tired of the "bed wetters" BS what does it mean anyways?Zamboni Driver wrote:Boothy missed in the shootout?RoyalDude wrote:I'm struggling to be negative![]()
Great game in Chi-town
Tough stretch for all the bed-wetters, they must have a pretty bad urinary blockage by now.
sagebrush wrote:After the previous couple games, & with Weber + Alberts in, I didn't expect much against Chicago.
The word 'resilient' doesn't do it justice.
The Canucks have been showing discipline & confidence. More than the last couple years.
Fixed it for ya.Cornuck wrote:Danny! Fuckyeah!
PS. Fuck the Hawks.
Defensive discipline, & resulting break outs, have been improving through (almost all) the team, including the call ups.Hockey Widow wrote:sagebrush wrote:After the previous couple games, & with Weber + Alberts in, I didn't expect much against Chicago.
The word 'resilient' doesn't do it justice.
The Canucks have been showing discipline & confidence. More than the last couple years.
And Weber has been playing well.
Really liked the reason he gave for it though.mathonwy wrote:Are you kidding me Torts??
You put the fucking Sedins in for the SHOOT OUT??!?!?
You and I ... We are in concorde. It seems that the Sedins can do everything else but can't deke a goalie is a narrative that is accepted too easily on a too small sample size for Torts. Another reason I love the new coach.Meds wrote:Really liked the reason he gave for it though.mathonwy wrote:Are you kidding me Torts??
You put the fucking Sedins in for the SHOOT OUT??!?!?
Yup. They're way past their Art Ross winning days. Only ranked 18th and 19th in scoring in the league? With the same amount of points as the heavily praised Toews? Pffft! Dsgraceful!RoyalDude wrote:Did Gillis drop the ball again by locking the aging Sedins to untradeable long term luongo type contracts? They suck right now
RoyalDude wrote:I'm struggling to be negative
I basically agree. The Sedin game is based on cycling and tape to tape passes. You can't do that in the shootout.mathonwy wrote:This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Trying to teach the Sedins a lesson in a shoot out AGAINST THE BLACKHAWKS?!?!Island Nucklehead wrote:Highlighting the "your best players have to be your best players" kinda thing... The Sedins performance in the shootout legit costs us points.Reefer2 wrote:seriously is JT that stupid to put both Sedins out there????
Really?
Next practice should be an hour of straight breakaways...
At least we know Lack is capable.
The Nucks won tonight in spite of Torts. You put your best one-on-one players in the shoot out.
Santo, Kesler, Hansen, Higgins, Kassian .. even Weise.
NOT the god damn Sedins.
This is bullshit. Daniel Sedin has gone public saying the reason Sweden didn't fare better in 2010 was that all lines got equal time. He says we need to have two go-to lines that play like twenty minutes each, and the third and fourth line will just have to accept that.mathonwy wrote: I discount your theory of the Sedins wanting to be counted on more. Since the Sedins have come into their own, we've had problems with secondary scoring for a lot of that time. I think the Sedins look forward to becoming 2nd line players one of these days.
I will forever always be in awe of David Booths consistency at defensive zone giveaways due to his deft stick handling and his high IQ vision under tight checking. I'm just trying to decide who is a better stick handler - Steve 'hot potato puck' Bernier or David 'all thumbs' Booth.The Brown Knight wrote: C''mon Dude.
For old times sake.
Let us know how you feel about David "Bimbo" Booth!![]()
![]()