OOTS: 2013-14

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 42804
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Strangelove »

Strangelove wrote: One of the worst groups of dee in the league, and a team severely lacking in character.
Looks like Reimer agrees with me:

http://www.tsn.ca/toronto/blogs/jonas_siegel/?id=439281

"There's never an excuse," said Reimer. "There's never an excuse. Injuries, tired – it's all BS. Those are excuses and they're useless. What it comes down to is your will, your heart, your character."

Reimer probably has more character than any other Leaf...

Brown Knight, the Leaves have 2 third-line centres injured atm (Bolland + Bozak).

They don't possess a true top-6 centre... Kadri might become one eventually.

Anyway, as Reimer says, injuries are no excuse for the Leaves.

As an aside, I feel many of the Leaf players hate Carlyle with a passion.

18-wheeler going right off a cliff. :mex:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by herb »

Strangelove wrote:18-wheeler going right off a cliff. :mex:
Enjoying yourself yet??

Canucks playing well + leaves suckage + Oilers continually abysmal team = great times on the coast!
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 18097
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Topper »

dbr wrote:Schenn did turn though.

He was going to get obliterated anyway but you can't see a hit like that coming and turn away from it, it's just the worst thing you can do for yourself.


(edit: I guess my point is that it makes it tough to suspend for the injury in cases like this, which obviously the league does. IMO give Wilson a few games for a reckless run at a player so you can really throw the book at him if he keeps it up in the future but Schenn put himself in a really bad spot.)
Bingo, What was Shenn's INTENT turning like that.

Injury, like or not, is written into the CBA as a factor to consider in supplementary discipline.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 42804
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Strangelove »

herb wrote:
Strangelove wrote:18-wheeler going right off a cliff. :mex:
Enjoying yourself yet??

Canucks playing well + leaves suckage + Oilers continually abysmal team = great times on the coast!
:D
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
KeyserSoze
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:39 am

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by KeyserSoze »

This is a good example of what not to do in both cases.

If Schenn sees someone coming, even last minute, he can't try to eek out by turning his back on the play. It seems to me like he identified a hit coming with enough time to still accelerate forward or at least brace himself...but chose to turn instead. He should also expect immediate pressure, he is handling the puck in the corner of all places. Gutless move on his part to turn like that.

Wilson should likely not be as reckless as he was...but I find it difficult to blame him much more than I do Schenn. Not sure if the Caps were making an offensive zone change, and he was high tailing it to get into the play to sustain pressure...but whatever the case he was clearly on a collision course to crush something. The extra few strides at the end were likely there because Wilson realized Schenn was ripe for the picking, which is the part I don't like. He could have glided in and still crushed him. Don't get me wrong, I love the aggressive fore check, hitting hard, and making your opponents rush plays because of it...but I think Wilson realized the potential for a monster hit was there and took full advantage...and unfortunately it did not end well.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by herb »

KeyserSoze wrote:If Schenn sees someone coming, even last minute, he can't try to eek out by turning his back on the play. It seems to me like he identified a hit coming with enough time to still accelerate forward or at least brace himself...but chose to turn instead. He should also expect immediate pressure, he is handling the puck in the corner of all places. Gutless move on his part to turn like that.
Players turn to avoid hits all the time. The Sedins avoid contact with a quick spin or turn nearly every game. That doesn't mean the guy who got hit should get the blame on what was a predatory charge.

I love a hard fore check. I love fast paced, aggressive hockey. I hate the lack of respect many players have for their competition.
User avatar
BurningBeard
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:02 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by BurningBeard »

Since Schenn's actions and intent are coming up so much into the conversation, and rightly so, here's something to consider...

On that particular hit, does anyone truly think it would have turned out significantly better had Schenn actually turned into it? I think Wilson was so out of control with momentum, Schenn would have ended up landing on his back and smashing his head into the boards either way. Schenn was in that sweet spot (5 feet away from the boards with the puck) where, if he gets hit hard, it's going to be bad. Wilson hits him so hard he flies off the ice after contact, which is why he ends up falling down immediately after (Schenn's leg also trips him slightly).

While he definitely shares responsibility, I think people are putting a bit too much blame on Schenn for this one.
Every time I look out my window, same three dogs looking back at me.
User avatar
KeyserSoze
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:39 am

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by KeyserSoze »

herb wrote: Players turn to avoid hits all the time. The Sedins avoid contact with a quick spin or turn nearly every game. That doesn't mean the guy who got hit should get the blame on what was a predatory charge.

I love a hard fore check. I love fast paced, aggressive hockey. I hate the lack of respect many players have for their competition.
Schenn obviously shouldn't get all of the blame...but he should surely get some of it.

Turning was a gutless move on his part. "Taking a hit to make a play"...well Schenn wasn't willing. Not saying I totally blame him or don't understand why he turned, but he would have been better off skating through it or bracing himself imo. I think he realized he was in trouble with enough time to take an extra quick stride or two, which may have at least saved his head/neck. Hell, if he had done that it may have been Wilson flying into the boards and getting hurt on the play. Impossible to say.

I fully agree about the lack of respect, and mentioned that I didn't like the final few strides (or mentality in general) that Wilson took when he realized that Schenn was ripe to be crushed. He could have finished his hit on the glide per usual, but instead accelerated at the last moment to take advantage of the somewhat vulnerable player.

Interestingly enough, these 2 players had a scrap earlier this year immediately after a faceoff, so there could be some bad blood there. Not sure if Wilson knew who he was hitting, but I'm guessing he did.
User avatar
Island Nucklehead
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8392
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Island Nucklehead »

KeyserSoze wrote: Turning was a gutless move on his part. "Taking a hit to make a play"...well Schenn wasn't willing. Not saying I totally blame him or don't understand why he turned, but he would have been better off skating through it or bracing himself imo. I think he realized he was in trouble with enough time to take an extra quick stride or two, which may have at least saved his head/neck. Hell, if he had done that it may have been Wilson flying into the boards and getting hurt on the play. Impossible to say.
I think the point a lot of people are making is that it doesn't matter if he turned or not. A charge is a charge, and boarding is boarding. Someone taking a run like that, and nailing his opponent "violently into the boards" is a penalty regardless or what way the opponent is facing.

I think the league needs to reinforce that the idea of body checking/contact is to separate the player from the puck, not put someone in the hospital. Now guys can get pumped up with a big hit and swing momentum, but ultimately the league has to protect these guys from themselves. If you want to be a predatory player, you need to pay the price with being suspended and losing a bunch of money.

I still think he only gets 1-2 games. There have been far more malicious hits this season, and the going rate for them (sadly) is 1-2 games.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by herb »

BurningBeard wrote:On that particular hit, does anyone truly think it would have turned out significantly better had Schenn actually turned into it? I think Wilson was so out of control with momentum, Schenn would have ended up landing on his back and smashing his head into the boards either way. Schenn was in that sweet spot (5 feet away from the boards with the puck) where, if he gets hit hard, it's going to be bad. Wilson hits him so hard he flies off the ice after contact, which is why he ends up falling down immediately after (Schenn's leg also trips him slightly).
I agree. When Wilson is coming in at that type of out of speed with the intention of inflicting a devastating hit, it's going to be devastating if it's in the open ice, right along the boards or 5 feet from the boards.
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by herb »

Island Nucklehead wrote:I think the league needs to reinforce that the idea of body checking/contact is to separate the player from the puck, not put someone in the hospital.
Yup.

Separate stick from puck - not head from body.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 19125
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Hockey Widow »

Compare that hit to the one on Getzlaf. He gets a bump, does a toe pick, ends up face first into the boards. Called 5 minutes and a game for boarding. To me no suspension. On the Schenn hit, ya gotta give the guy 3-4 games on that one.

On the Stanton hit I think that too should be 1-2 game suspension. He had his arms held up as he was guided into the boards. He had zero opportunity to put his arms up to brace himself. If he had not have fallen he would have done a face plant into the glass. Not as bad a hit but careless, a penalty on the play and a resulting injury.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
sagebrush
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:36 pm
Location: around the bend

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by sagebrush »

herb wrote: Canucks playing well + leaves suckage + Oilers continually abysmal team = great times on the coast!
Nonuts quote:
I'm not now, nor have I ever contemplated making a coaching change.
:drink:
Less Canucks embarrassment please.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 19125
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Hockey Widow »

Funny, all the talk that Gardiner must go, we would have gladly taken him and Scrivens for Luongo. They they wouldn't have had to trade for Bernier :mrgreen:

But then we wouldn't have Horvat and who knows where Lack would be playing.

They are looking to move a D man for help at Centre. Too bad JS wasn't healthy. We could very well be in the market for a D man soon.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by herb »

Hockey Widow wrote:Funny, all the talk that Gardiner must go, we would have gladly taken him and Scrivens for Luongo. They they wouldn't have had to trade for Bernier :mrgreen:

But then we wouldn't have Horvat and who knows where Lack would be playing.
Isn't it great when things end up in your favour? :drink:
Post Reply