By the Numbers
Moderator: Referees
By the Numbers
All right, so we're approaching the mid-season doldrums, thought it'd be fun to reminisce on who the best (or worse) Canucks of all time were, by uniform number. Only rule is the player has to have the majority of his success with one number - i.e Geoff Courtnall wore #10 & #14 but should only be considered for #14, where he had his best years. Only exception is Bure since no one else wore #96
Here's my list, what does yours look like?
Here's my list, what does yours look like?
Re: By the Numbers
That was a fun read. Thanks for that!
I would take Diduck over Lanz and Murzyn over Butcher, but call me sentimental for '94.
I would take Diduck over Lanz and Murzyn over Butcher, but call me sentimental for '94.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.
Re: By the Numbers
I struggled with those two as well.Lancer wrote:
I would take Diduck over Lanz and Murzyn over Butcher, but call me sentimental for '94.
What's amazing is how many mediocre players wore common numbers like 15, or 17 (the most common number used). It's no wonder they were so bad in the 70's and 80's. In the old Smythe Division, other teams were throwing out centres like Gretzky, Messier, Gilmour, Dionne, Nicholls, Hawerchuck, the best we muster were nice players like Sundstrom and Gradin
Re: By the Numbers
Yet Sundström still holds the NHL record for most points in a playoff game.Vader wrote:What's amazing is how many mediocre players wore common numbers like 15, or 17 (the most common number used). It's no wonder they were so bad in the 70's and 80's. In the old Smythe Division, other teams were throwing out centres like Gretzky, Messier, Gilmour, Dionne, Nicholls, Hawerchuck, the best we muster were nice players like Sundstrom and Gradin
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=30
Whatever you do, always give 100 %!
Except when donating blood.
Except when donating blood.
Re: By the Numbers
Per wrote:Yet Sundström still holds the NHL record for most points in a playoff game.Vader wrote:What's amazing is how many mediocre players wore common numbers like 15, or 17 (the most common number used). It's no wonder they were so bad in the 70's and 80's. In the old Smythe Division, other teams were throwing out centres like Gretzky, Messier, Gilmour, Dionne, Nicholls, Hawerchuck, the best we muster were nice players like Sundstrom and Gradin
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=30
Yeah, with NEW JERSEY!
Sundstrom was an excellent player, but simply wasn't in the same class with the other centres in the league and division at the time
Re: By the Numbers
Likewise, Krutov is one of the greatest hockey players of all time.Vader wrote:Per wrote:Yet Sundström still holds the NHL record for most points in a playoff game.Vader wrote:What's amazing is how many mediocre players wore common numbers like 15, or 17 (the most common number used). It's no wonder they were so bad in the 70's and 80's. In the old Smythe Division, other teams were throwing out centres like Gretzky, Messier, Gilmour, Dionne, Nicholls, Hawerchuck, the best we muster were nice players like Sundstrom and Gradin
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=30
Yeah, with NEW JERSEY!
Sundstrom was an excellent player, but simply wasn't in the same class with the other centres in the league and division at the time
Unfortunately, he didn't show any of that in Vancouver......
Whatever you do, always give 100 %!
Except when donating blood.
Except when donating blood.
Re: By the Numbers
My number is 18 on most of my jerseys (also 10 ) that I wore for teams so I am biased....hopefully Stanton will be in the rafters one dayVader wrote:I struggled with those two as well.Lancer wrote:
I would take Diduck over Lanz and Murzyn over Butcher, but call me sentimental for '94.
What's amazing is how many mediocre players wore common numbers like 15, or 17 (the most common number used). It's no wonder they were so bad in the 70's and 80's. In the old Smythe Division, other teams were throwing out centres like Gretzky, Messier, Gilmour, Dionne, Nicholls, Hawerchuck, the best we muster were nice players like Sundstrom and Gradin
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: By the Numbers
Per wrote:Likewise, Krutov is one of the greatest hockey players of all time.Vader wrote:Per wrote:
Yet Sundström still holds the NHL record for most points in a playoff game.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=30
Yeah, with NEW JERSEY!
Sundstrom was an excellent player, but simply wasn't in the same class with the other centres in the league and division at the time
Unfortunately, he didn't show any of that in Vancouver......
Some tanks just run out of petrol or get fat I guess....
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: By the Numbers
Always been 19, back to little league..all sports
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
- The Brown Knight
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:42 am
Re: By the Numbers
Good post Vader, but I disagree on some.
-Kirk McLean gets the nod over Luongo for 1994 alone. Luongo has McLean beat everywhere else, but we saw what McLean did in 1994.......compared to what Luongo did when we needed him most in 2011 during Games 6 and 7 of the finals.
-Burrows over Geoff Courtnall
-King Richard over Corey "mysterious injuries when it matters most" Schneider
-Bieksa over Lidster
-Diduck over Lanz
-Hodgson over Cloutier. Cloutier's poor performances when we needed him most, pushes him down IMO. On the other hand, Hodgson owning Tim Thomas in the imaginary "Game 8" was one of the prettiest goals in franchise history.......and showed to the world just how much of a clutch player that Hodgson was. Hodgson played brilliantly that year against rival Canuck teams.
-Kirk McLean gets the nod over Luongo for 1994 alone. Luongo has McLean beat everywhere else, but we saw what McLean did in 1994.......compared to what Luongo did when we needed him most in 2011 during Games 6 and 7 of the finals.
-Burrows over Geoff Courtnall
-King Richard over Corey "mysterious injuries when it matters most" Schneider
-Bieksa over Lidster
-Diduck over Lanz
-Hodgson over Cloutier. Cloutier's poor performances when we needed him most, pushes him down IMO. On the other hand, Hodgson owning Tim Thomas in the imaginary "Game 8" was one of the prettiest goals in franchise history.......and showed to the world just how much of a clutch player that Hodgson was. Hodgson played brilliantly that year against rival Canuck teams.
Or start balding as they approach their 50's.Arachnid wrote:
Some tanks just run out of petrol or get fat I guess....
"I post the Brown Way" ~ Connor McHindu"
The Dark Indian Rises
The Dark Indian Rises
Re: By the Numbers
Luongo / McLean was a tough one. If neither made a SCF it would be Luongo, no question. I went based on the entire body of work, Luongo was more consistent year in and out.The Brown Knight wrote:Good post Vader, but I disagree on some.
-Kirk McLean gets the nod over Luongo for 1994 alone. Luongo has McLean beat everywhere else, but we saw what McLean did in 1994.......compared to what Luongo did when we needed him most in 2011 during Games 6 and 7 of the finals.
-Burrows over Geoff Courtnall
-King Richard over Corey "mysterious injuries when it matters most" Schneider
-Bieksa over Lidster
-Diduck over Lanz
-Hodgson over Cloutier. Cloutier's poor performances when we needed him most, pushes him down IMO. On the other hand, Hodgson owning Tim Thomas in the imaginary "Game 8" was one of the prettiest goals in franchise history.......and showed to the world just how much of a clutch player that Hodgson was. Hodgson played brilliantly that year against rival Canuck teams.
Yeah, I was pretty iffy on Bieksa and Lidster myself. Ditto Diduck / Lanz.
Burrows / Courtnall? another close one, but I personally think Burrows scoring is a bit too tied to the Sedin's to knock off Courtnall
Hodgson didn't even last a season here, Cloutier, like him or hate him, was the undisputed #1 goalie for 4 (long) years. Can't agree with that one
Re: By the Numbers
28 eh mackArachnid wrote:My number is 18 on most of my jerseys (also 10 )
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: By the Numbers
Gelinas is and always will be my favorite #23. Not the most talented, but 100% heart. And, he played by 3 simple rules. 1) if your team doesn't have the puck, go get it. 2) If yo have the puck, put it on net. 3) If you don't have the puck, go to the net.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Re: By the Numbers
I always figured that if she wears my jersey (and just my jersey) I can always claim that I thought she was 18Topper wrote:28 eh mackArachnid wrote:My number is 18 on most of my jerseys (also 10 )
I love every move Jim Benning makes
- The Brown Knight
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:42 am
Re: By the Numbers
For me, longevity isn't too much of a factor. I tend to view things on a scale of between -10 and +10 (intuitively). A positive or negative memory will obviously shift the scale accordingly. Intuitively, I would have Hodgson slightly on the negative, but fairly close to '0' (like a -1.2). Hodgson obviously had his off ice daddy issues and was limited in his skill-set ( especially on the defensive side of things), but he scored some big time clutch goals in his short time here. I think Hodgson would have helped us against the Kings that year.Vader wrote:Hodgson didn't even last a season here, Cloutier, like him or hate him, was the undisputed #1 goalie for 4 (long) years. Can't agree with that one
Cloutier, for his time here, had some decent moments, but the negative far outweighed the positives. The Lidstrom goal, the shaky play against the Wild in Game 7, the constant injuries, etc. I would put Cloutier at a -4.5.
"I post the Brown Way" ~ Connor McHindu"
The Dark Indian Rises
The Dark Indian Rises