OOTS: 2013-14

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Arachnid
CC Legend
Posts: 6196
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Old Berlin
Contact:

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Arachnid » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:15 pm

BurningBeard wrote:Neal get's 5, and I have to think this is the NHL gearing up to bring the hammer down on Thornton.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=695100
Yeah, if Neal gets 5 for that Thorny is gonna get.....20? Still not enough to send a message.
I love every move Jim Benning makes 8-)

User avatar
SKYO
CC Legend
Posts: 9398
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by SKYO » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:25 pm

I think because it's Campbell on that team, they should ban him even longer, just to show there is no bias, they need a deterrent to stop that thuggery of throwing a person down to the ice with a slew foot and proceed to punch that player in the head repeatedly against the ice.

Campbell would approve and expect a good long sentence, I mean suspension.
A long time ago, a baseball player remarked: "If I owned a ballclub, I'd hire a $5,000 coach and a $15,000 scout."

User avatar
Lancer
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Lancer » Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:39 pm

SKYO wrote:I think because it's Campbell on that team, they should ban him even longer, just to show there is no bias, they need a deterrent to stop that thuggery of throwing a person down to the ice with a slew foot and proceed to punch that player in the head repeatedly against the ice.

Campbell would approve and expect a good long sentence, I mean suspension.
It's the Bruins - the NHL poster boy for double-standards. I'd be surprised if he got mroe than 10 games.

Unless, you had your tongue firmly in cheeck writing that... :lol:
Love the Sport. Love the Team.

Hate the League.

User avatar
BurningBeard
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:02 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by BurningBeard » Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:52 pm

He's going to get 10+, and at this point, given what just happened with Neal, I wouldn't be surprised by 15+.

I don't care that it's the Bruins, I'll be floored if he gets less then 10.
Every time I look out my window, same three dogs looking back at me.

User avatar
dangler
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Commercial Drive Coffee shop

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by dangler » Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:03 pm

prepare to be floored BB
Retool Rebuild

User avatar
SKYO
CC Legend
Posts: 9398
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by SKYO » Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:09 pm

Lancer wrote:It's the Bruins - the NHL poster boy for double-standards. I'd be surprised if he got mroe than 10 games.

Unless, you had your tongue firmly in cheeck writing that... :lol:
lol it'll be a lifetime ban bro. 8-)
A long time ago, a baseball player remarked: "If I owned a ballclub, I'd hire a $5,000 coach and a $15,000 scout."

Larry Goodenough
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:43 am

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Larry Goodenough » Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:15 pm

When are the Bruins going to stop the continued cheap shots against them and finally address their lack of toughness?

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 13266
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:37 pm

Glad Neal got 5. One of the few times I think Shanny got it right. Also glad Dianna has a hearing. About time he gets a suspension. I'd give him 3 as a non repeat offender.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 17384
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Strangelove » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:20 pm

Image

Captain Kangaroo ruled that Neal purposely kneed Marchand in the head.

He insinuated that the suspension would have been longer if Marchand had been injured.

And he said: “Although he is not a repeat offender under the terms of the CBA we cannot ignore the fact that Neal has previously been fined once and suspended twice during his 6 year NHL career.”

Again with this 'we're not supposed to treat him as a repeat offender but we will anyway' crap! :lol:

Whatever, it all smells like bullshit to this cowboy...
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Canuck-One
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:49 am
Location: Living the Life

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Canuck-One » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:34 pm

With the pending lawsuit that is to be filed against the NHL about concussions, you would think they should come down hard. I doubt they will though as in reality Jacobs is the NHL boss not Bettman. Shanahan has turned into nothing more than a talking head with somebody else's hand up his ass. I say 5 games. I sure hope I'm wrong and he gets the boot for the rest of the year but I doubt it.

User avatar
sagebrush
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:36 pm
Location: around the bend

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by sagebrush » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:35 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:Glad Neal got 5. One of the few times I think Shanny got it right.
That's the same suspension that Marchand ( a repeat offender) got in 2012 for his hit on Salo, that resulted in a concussion.

User avatar
Arachnid
CC Legend
Posts: 6196
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Old Berlin
Contact:

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Arachnid » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:35 pm

Strangelove wrote:Image

Captain Kangaroo ruled that Neal purposely kneed Marchand in the head.

He insinuated that the suspension would have been longer if Marchand had been injured.

And he said: “Although he is not a repeat offender under the terms of the CBA we cannot ignore the fact that Neal has previously been fined once and suspended twice during his 6 year NHL career.”

Again with this 'we're not supposed to treat him as a repeat offender but we will anyway' crap! :lol:

Whatever, it all smells like bullshit to this cowboy...
And Kassian got 8 :look:
I love every move Jim Benning makes 8-)

User avatar
ClamRussel
CC Legend
Posts: 3992
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:50 am
Location: New South Wales, Australia

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by ClamRussel » Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:14 pm

Strangelove wrote:Image

Captain Kangaroo ruled that Neal purposely kneed Marchand in the head.

He insinuated that the suspension would have been longer if Marchand had been injured.

And he said: “Although he is not a repeat offender under the terms of the CBA we cannot ignore the fact that Neal has previously been fined once and suspended twice during his 6 year NHL career.”

Again with this 'we're not supposed to treat him as a repeat offender but we will anyway' crap! :lol:

Whatever, it all smells like bullshit to this cowboy...
Both of those caught my attention. I'm tired of injuries playing so much of a factor. Sure they should be considered but if they ever want to honestly try and clean up the game they'll put more weight on intent. Suspending Hansen this year was absurd. Anyways, the "repeat offender" angle really sheds light on the IQ and mindset within the NHL head office. Seriously? Thats some sound logic there, Brendan.
"Once a King, always a King" -Mike Murphy

User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 9803
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by Topper » Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:15 pm

The repeat offender line that many (read cowboys with clams) seem so upset about was clearly defined by Betman when he ruled on Patrick Kaleta's appeal. Read specifically the bottom of page 12 through page 15. All prior offences are considered whether the player is considered a repeat offender or not.
Last edited by Topper on Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.

User avatar
mathonwy
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2108
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:53 pm

Re: OOTS: 2013-14

Post by mathonwy » Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:17 pm

Strangelove wrote:Image
I watched this clip too many times..

Post Reply