Arachnid wrote:
So you're saying we should have sent dEdmonton to the SEL years ago?!![]()
I like it!
+100 !!
Moderator: Referees
Arachnid wrote:
So you're saying we should have sent dEdmonton to the SEL years ago?!![]()
I like it!
Still feel the same way Tiger?Tiger wrote:??? Please tell Samuelsson,Raymond,Hansen and Burrows that BS..vic wrote:Kesler isn't good enough to be a 1C in this league. He doesn't make the players around him better.
He hasn't had anybody on the second line worth shite for the last 2 years..
Yepvic wrote:Still feel the same way Tiger?Tiger wrote:??? Please tell Samuelsson,Raymond,Hansen and Burrows that BS..vic wrote:Kesler isn't good enough to be a 1C in this league. He doesn't make the players around him better.
He hasn't had anybody on the second line worth shite for the last 2 years..
Whoa, hold on there - are you saying that Kesler made Henrik a better player because Henrik went onto his line?Tiger wrote: Yepwith Hank on the line in the 3rd period.. 2 goals.. Danny didn't get a shot on goal all game ..
Hockey widow gave out some stats : from NHL .com here are same stats for playoffs including the ones she
neglected to give.. check out the +/- on regular season and on playoffs.. great reg season stats .. but - players in the playoffs.. There best 2 seasons were 08/09 07/08 . Since then goal production has been in decline .
http://espn.go.com/nhl/player/stats/_/i ... niel-sedin
About the same for Hank.. so stats tell me we are more liable to be scored against when the Sedins are on the ice during the playoffs.. But of course anyone watching last years playoffs or the Bruins/Nucks 2011 will know that
Too bad they hadn't separated the twins earlier in their career..
Nope agree with you.. but of course Kesler makes the PP work too..Whoa, hold on there - are you saying that Kesler made Henrik a better player because Henrik went onto his line?
Fact is that Kelser and Higgins benefited from Henrik (a true #1C) on their line, not the other way around.
Do you really believe Santorelli (sp?) puts up the same number playing along side Kesler? Burrows becomes a 30 goal scorer playing along side Kesler?
No way Kesler puts up 41 goals that year if not for being put on the top PP with (guess who) Henrik.
Said it before, will say it again, Kesler isn't good enough to be a #1C in this league. He doesn't make the players around him better.
It's kinda hard to say really.....they have always played together when both healthy, and so far this year they have both produced when split up.Tiger wrote:sorry vic
Burrows would score 30 with Kesler.. same as Samuelsson did..
I am very impressed with Hanks play of late.. and his versatility.. just thinking
he is more valuable to the Canucks than his brother .. like to hear a few other
opinions on that ..?
Tiger wrote:sorry vic
Burrows would score 30 with Kesler
heard a stat on the radio yesterday that he only scored 8 of those 41 goals against Playoff teams.Tiger wrote:vic said :.. for your information Kesler got the most 5 on 5 goals the year he scored 41.. Not Danny.. Not Hank..
There is no fucking way the post-Keith-assault Daniel could get a PPG playing on a second line with Ryan Kesler.Meds wrote:I'd almost put money down on Hank and Dank both being 75-85 point playmakers on separate lines.