Blob Mckenzie wrote:More concerned about whether the twins are back or not. How many third line wingers does this team need ? Higgins, Hansen, soon to be Burrows..... Booth. two of these HAVE to be gone by the 14-15 season.
herb wrote:If Hansen doesn't have a breakout season offensively (doesn't look like he's capable of scoring 20+) I'd consider moving him at the deadline. Like blob said, too many 3rd/4th line tweeners and hopefully we see some youngsters push themselves up the depth chart this year.
Topper wrote:and trade Burrows.
Hank wrote:The next BOLD moves should involve trying to trade the remaining contracts of players whose last name begin with "B".
dbr wrote:I was thinking that, there's your next bold move.
FAN wrote:I would start the extension talks with him and then see how he fits in with Torts. Hansen should fit in just fine and I'll look to give him 4 years, Higgins money, limited NTC.
I don't understand the talk about Hansen not being a good 3rd line player. If anything, Hansen is an ideal 3rd line player. He's not a good 2nd line player and he's certainly not a 3rd line/4th line tweener.
Meds wrote:I'm a bit puzzled by the Burrows hate.
The guy has scored so many big goals for this team, he plays in every situation, he's even cleaned up his act on the ice. He even took a major haircut on his previous contract to allow GMMG to keep the core together and add depth to help the team. When he signed that $2M deal he could easily have gotten close to $4M somewhere else.
Is it purely because of his reputation that people want him gone?
Users browsing this forum: Hockey Widow, MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests