Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Rumsfeld wrote:
Well you need to keep in mind that RD knows that team would suck ass.
Which would make Gillis look really bad.
Whih would allow RD to spam the board with Gilis hate.
Which would in turn make RD feel really good.
Would it make him feel better than if a Gillis-assembled squad brought home Lord Stanley? That's the million-dollar question...
Listen Bum(juice)feld. I'm just going by what Gillis and Gillman have been preaching - "the core will remain, and the kids will get a better look" That's how Chef Boi RD comes to his conclusions.
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate
RoyalDude wrote: I'm just going by what Gillis and Gillman have been preaching - "the core will remain, and the kids will get a better look" That's how Chef Boi RD comes to his conclusions.
Oh is it?
Anyway I'm sure you'll be more than happy to splatter the board with fecal matter no mattrer what Gillis does.
Empty vessels make the loudest noise, and all that rot.
Rumsfeld wrote:
Anyway I'm sure you'll be more than happy to splatter the board with fecal matter no mattrer what Gillis does.
Empty vessels make the loudest noise, and all that rot.
The future does not look to rosey for the Players Agent.
When has the future of anything Canuck-related looked rosy to you my man? Your predictions of gloom and failure might carry a tad more weight if they hadn't been repeated ad nauseum for a decade or so... regardless of the actual success of the team.
Rumsfeld wrote:
Anyway I'm sure you'll be more than happy to splatter the board with fecal matter no mattrer what Gillis does.
Empty vessels make the loudest noise, and all that rot.
The future does not look to rosey for the Players Agent.
When has the future of anything Canuck-related looked rosy to you my man? Your predictions of gloom and failure might carry a tad more weight if they hadn't been repeated ad nauseum for a decade or so... regardless of the actual success of the team.
Do carry on though...
My job won't be done until Gillis is back doing the day job he should never have left. The problem with Gillis is, Like all Players Agents, they love their players too much....he seemingly hasn't changed since switching fields.
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate
RoyalDude wrote:
The future does not look to rosey for the Players Agent.
When has the future of anything Canuck-related looked rosy to you my man? Your predictions of gloom and failure might carry a tad more weight if they hadn't been repeated ad nauseum for a decade or so... regardless of the actual success of the team.
Do carry on though...
My job won't be done until Gillis is back doing the day job he should never have left. The problem with Gillis is, Like all Players Agents, they love their players too much....he seemingly hasn't changed since switching fields.
Hey BD, I'm curious, have you ever actually played the game? I mean besides selling penny stock to your coked out faux clients and rode your bike really fast racing to the bottom of a hill (gravity wheels?! ), have you coached, managed or refed an organized sport game?
You seem to lack any instinct for it other than being a bitchy, whiney Canuck hockey fan.
Please clarify, our collective dumbfoundedness on your posts.
Hawks played a really good game today, the only thing that kept Boston in the game was Crawford's poor play. Shots were 47-33 in favor of Chicago, and the Bruins were absolutely abysmal in their own end tonight, they all but gave Chicago the game.
), have you coached, managed or refed an organized sport game?
