From Bountiful to Ponoka

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Rumsfeld » Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:57 pm

Multiple media sources, both eastern and western, stated that Gillis dropped his offer to two 2nds on deadline day and when that was refused, he lowballed it to a single 2nd in an effort to get Lou da fok outta here and end the drama.

Reporters brought this up at the press conference after and Gillis didn't deny it. He admitted to basically giving Lou away because he felt they owed it to Roberto to end his suffering. :roll: The Leafs would only have been picking up a fraction of his '13 salary if they'd picked him up then, so I kind of doubt Nonis is going to look like an idiot by aquiring him now, AFTER the wost game 7 meltdown in hockey history (still laffing).

I doubt he will go for substantially more in the summer because teams already know how low Gillis was ready to go. Florida seems like a good fit and they do have a surplus of young talent so I guess there is some reason to be more optimistic. Like I said, 2nd and a good prospect and I'd be thrilled.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby ukcanuck » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:12 pm

coco_canuck wrote:
Strangelove wrote:I still think a package like Matthias and Petrovic can be had.


Hope you're right, that would be a great deal for us.

I sort of see it the same way Rummy does, the Canucks were willing to move him for two 2nds at the deadline so teams probably aren't offering a whole lot more at this point unless, like Topper says, Gillis can create some sort of bidding war with a team like the Flyers.

The ace in the hole for Gillis would be to take back a contract, say Upshall and his $3.5M contract for next two years, and buy-out that deal in order to get back something more significant in return. But if what HW and others say is right, that Aquaman isn't keen on buy-outs, then we shouldn't really expect that to happen.


What if its Matthias @ 2 year(s), $1,703,250RFA
Plus Petrovic @ 3 year(s), $2,475,000 » RFA
And upshall @ 4 year(s), $14,000,000UFA
So that's 850,000
850.000
3.500,000
5.200,000

For luongo's 5.5 cap hit that's a wash and we have three bodies...

Upshall might make a good fourth line winger ...

I don't know how he got a 14 million dollar contract though... He basically had one good year in 07 ...
User avatar
ukcanuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:04 am

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Strangelove » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:13 pm

coco_canuck wrote:Canucks were willing to move him for two 2nds at the deadline so teams probably aren't offering a whole lot more at this point


Luongo is going to have much more value in the off-season than at the deadline

(unless there had happened to be a contender with a very-suspect/injured #1).

With that contract, we're not talking about a rental.

This is a marriage and marriages tend to happen in the summer. :P

coco_canuck wrote:But if what HW and others say is right... Aquaman isn't keen on buy-outs


Pretty sure HW and others were just running with an obscure quote + opinion of an idiot hockey writer.

It defies logic to believe that Aquaman

....with all that we know about him from past moves...

wouldn't take advantage of this glorious opportunity for a richer team to take advantage of this opportunity.

I'll bet the real story is they have no intention to waste the opportunity by buying out Ballard/Booth.

The rich teams WILL be making this kind of trade.

And your Vancouver Canucks WILL be one of them.

No need to do it in a Luongo trade though.

In my ever so humble opinion of course. :D
____
Big Dog
User avatar
Strangelove
CC Legend
 
Posts: 7741
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Rumsfeld » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:19 pm

Yeah I see no reason why Aquilini, given his history so far, would be so adverse to buyouts.

BTW, you rat packsters have derailed the living shit out of this thread, and in so doing you've most likely soiled the britches of three or four lurkers with a combined history of 68 posts.

Hope you're happy and reported.

Um, Calgary sucks.
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Strangelove » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:22 pm

Yeah, how the hell did we end up on this subject on this thread? :lol:
____
Big Dog
User avatar
Strangelove
CC Legend
 
Posts: 7741
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby coco_canuck » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:25 pm

Strangelove wrote:Yeah, how the hell did we end up on this subject on this thread? :lol:


:lol:

Damn good discussion though.
User avatar
coco_canuck
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:54 pm

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby ukcanuck » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:26 pm

How does anyone complain about actual canuck hockey talk on a thread Intended for laughing at Calgary ?

It's kind of what the complainers want ain't it?
User avatar
ukcanuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:04 am

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Topper » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:31 pm

Hey mongoloid farmers, stay on topic.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
 
Posts: 5149
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Rumsfeld » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:33 pm

Topper wrote:Hey mongoloid farmers, stay on topic.


Image
Cowards die a thousand times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Pissed in the Canyon

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby coco_canuck » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:36 pm

Rumsfeld wrote:Image


Sort of looks like Dutter.

Maybe the Flames will use a 1st rd pick on...it.
User avatar
coco_canuck
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:54 pm

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Hockey Widow » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:02 pm

Rumsfeld wrote:
Topper wrote:Hey mongoloid farmers, stay on topic.


Image



I never gave you permission to post my pic! :evil: WTF
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
 
Posts: 4440
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Blob Mckenzie » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:29 pm

coco_canuck wrote:
Rumsfeld wrote:Image


Sort of looks like Dutter.

Maybe the Flames will use a 1st rd pick on...it.



:lol: .... probably one of Pacific Blue's conquests from the Ivanhoe or the Dufferin.
Tell me how my ass tastes.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3168
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby okcanuck » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:56 pm

WTF, While on holidays, I come on here for my monthly dose of flat-lander, short-bus antidotes and all I get is Lou this and Gillis that.
User avatar
okcanuck
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:11 am
Location: Bestwank,BC

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby Eddy Punch Clock » Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:52 am

OK, back on track:

This is the problem, what is the point in trading for a goalie like Bernier when we know we are not going to be competing for the next season or two. He gets hung out to dry on a nightly basis and thinks "I'm off" when it gets to FA time.


It would take the best GM and coach money could buy..... and a miracle..... to make Calgary competitive in the next five years let alone two.
2011..... the one that got away.
User avatar
Eddy Punch Clock
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:35 am
Location: The Wack

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Postby ukcanuck » Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:54 am

I didn't think this thread was for constructive criticism of the Calgary flames. I thought this was where we pointed out the backward inbred nature of Albertans... With a hockey perspective of course...
User avatar
ukcanuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Canucks Corner Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], rockalt and 5 guests