Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by herb » Mon May 06, 2013 11:08 am

Frustrating that we could have, should have, won games one and two. Canucks were the better team in both games.

Things would be a lot different if we had.

User avatar
Reefer2
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5027
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:47 am

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Reefer2 » Mon May 06, 2013 11:27 am

Heard on the radio that Bieksa may be injured.

Let the excuses begin again.

Frack is this team ever lame.

User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by herb » Mon May 06, 2013 11:37 am

Reefer2 wrote:Heard on the radio that Bieksa may be injured.

Let the excuses begin again.

Frack is this team ever lame.
No excuses.

This team is as healthy as it has every been in the playoffs and is having its worst showing of this "core's" generation.

At least the epic collapses against Chicago were in the second round, and we were able to actually win some games and score some goals in the process.

Benjo
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:39 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Benjo » Mon May 06, 2013 1:11 pm

I tip my hat to those posters that said many of the Canucks were having career years in 10-11. I didn't believe it at the time and I thought many of our players had just finally reached their potential and would maintain it for 4-5 years, that just doesn't seem to be the case.

User avatar
donlever
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:07 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by donlever » Mon May 06, 2013 1:23 pm

herb wrote: No excuses.
It's called Avquitonitis.

You can hear it periodically in the voices of key personnel.

Kes.

Bieksa.

Lagongo.

As I understand (and totally believe) it ain't the only issue but this team appears to have seen enough of dem der coaches.

Cue Phil Collins....
A different goddamn hockey talk messageboard!

User avatar
herb
CC Legend
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by herb » Mon May 06, 2013 1:35 pm

donlever wrote: It's called Avquitonitis.
Is it curable? Rehab? Surgery? Really good drugs??

donlever wrote:As I understand (and totally believe) it ain't the only issue but this team appears to have seen enough of dem der coaches.
Certain aspects of the Canucks, certainly the powerplay, haven't been clicking for months. There's definitely a certain amount of blame that lies at the feet of the coaching staff, but at the end of the day, this team needs more horsepower up front too.

User avatar
donlever
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:07 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by donlever » Mon May 06, 2013 1:38 pm

herb wrote:
donlever wrote: It's called Avquitonitis.
Is it curable? Rehab? Surgery? Really good drugs??.
A good old fashioned bleeding usually does the trick.
herb wrote:
donlever wrote:As I understand (and totally believe) it ain't the only issue but this team appears to have seen enough of dem der coaches.
...but at the end of the day, this team needs more horsepower up front too.
Can't disagree with that, personally I was tired of this bunch a year ago.

But then I've pretty much avquitonitis the whole NHL for that matter.
A different goddamn hockey talk messageboard!

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15197
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon May 06, 2013 4:51 pm

I think most of us will be shocked if AV is not let go. I have heard that the Canucks have some interest in Ruff. Not sure how serious the interest is.

The other coaches need to go to. The only adjustment they have made on the PP is to drop Kesler back to the point, which is fine. But for the life of me I don't get why they don't play into the teams strengths and have Garrison on the 1st PP unit. If nothing else he might break a few bones on sone of those inclined to block shots. :mrgreen:
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Lancer
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2327
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Lancer » Mon May 06, 2013 5:48 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:The other coaches need to go to. The only adjustment they have made on the PP is to drop Kesler back to the point, which is fine. But for the life of me I don't get why they don't play into the teams strengths and have Garrison on the 1st PP unit. If nothing else he might break a few bones on sone of those inclined to block shots. :mrgreen:
Agreed. I don't know how it fits with whatever code they follow on NHL ice, but if teams just want to layer in the blockers then why not let the Garrisons and Edlers aim for vulnerable spots on the blockers? Break a couple of ankles (or jaws/cheekbones if you're lucky) and see how willing those fuckers get to step into their lanes. Vigenault should have called that one after the first couple powerplays in game one and start plunking the shot-blockers. Even if it costs you game one, you're sending a message out there. :twisted:
Love the Sport. Love the Team.

Hate the League.

User avatar
Arachnid
CC Legend
Posts: 6177
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Old Berlin
Contact:

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Arachnid » Mon May 06, 2013 6:14 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:I think most of us will be shocked if AV is not let go. I have heard that the Canucks have some interest in Ruff. Not sure how serious the interest is.

The other coaches need to go to. The only adjustment they have made on the PP is to drop Kesler back to the point, which is fine. But for the life of me I don't get why they don't play into the teams strengths and have Garrison on the 1st PP unit. If nothing else he might break a few bones on sone of those inclined to block shots. :mrgreen:
At least he would know zKickassian & Roy (if he would resign), I like Ruff, good with young players, rough (RUFF!) with vets :D
I love every move Jim Benning makes 8-)

User avatar
Arachnid
CC Legend
Posts: 6177
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Old Berlin
Contact:

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Arachnid » Mon May 06, 2013 6:15 pm

donlever wrote:
herb wrote: No excuses.
It's called Avquitonitis.

You can hear it periodically in the voices of key personnel.

Kes.

Bieksa.

Lagongo.

As I understand (and totally believe) it ain't the only issue but this team appears to have seen enough of dem der coaches.

Cue Phil Collins....
Maybe we need a new owner :wink:
I love every move Jim Benning makes 8-)

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15197
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon May 06, 2013 6:22 pm

Ownership has been fine. To my surprise. They spend to the cap and beyond and have given MG everything he has asked for. They have given him full autonomy. What more could a gm ask for really?
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Arachnid
CC Legend
Posts: 6177
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Old Berlin
Contact:

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Arachnid » Mon May 06, 2013 6:29 pm

Hockey Widow wrote:Ownership has been fine. To my surprise. They spend to the cap and beyond and have given MG everything he has asked for. They have given him full autonomy. What more could a gm ask for really?
Ownership gave us MG & AV, that is all.
I love every move Jim Benning makes 8-)

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15197
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Hockey Widow » Mon May 06, 2013 6:32 pm

Arachnid wrote:
Hockey Widow wrote:Ownership has been fine. To my surprise. They spend to the cap and beyond and have given MG everything he has asked for. They have given him full autonomy. What more could a gm ask for really?
Ownership gave us MG & AV, that is all.

No, they gave us MG. MG kept AV and extended him. They also gave us their cash.

Maybe they kiss and make up and rehire Burke?? LOL NOT

But who is out there as a GM that you would want. I'm not familiar with who may be available.
The only HW the Canucks need

Waffle
CC Veteran
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:38 am

Re: Canucks Vs Sharks, Round I

Post by Waffle » Tue May 07, 2013 12:14 am

HW, when the Dallas Stars announced the hiring of Jim Nill the only two other names that were tossed out as being considered were Ron Hextall who is an assistant in LA and Brian Burke. I don't know anything about Hextall's credentials to be a GM, and probably a lot of people won't know him from his playing days, but he was a fierce competitor as I am sure you know.

On another note, the talk I have seen regarding the Colorado coaching position seems to revolve around three people: Dallas Eakins of the Toronto Marlies (who is supposedly good with young player development but is considered a more defensive system minded coach), Doug Houda in Boston who I don't know much about, and, believe it or not, our very own AV!!

Regards

Post Reply