So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Moderator: Referees
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
At this point I'd rather keep Ballard and get rid of Garrison lol.
As Ballard and Tanev are the #1 pairing for the Canucks!
Too bad that's NOT going to happen though, but the way Ballard is playing and stock rising, we should be able to get a quality return, especially for the teams most pressing need - a 3rd line checking center who can put some decent points.
As Ballard and Tanev are the #1 pairing for the Canucks!
Too bad that's NOT going to happen though, but the way Ballard is playing and stock rising, we should be able to get a quality return, especially for the teams most pressing need - a 3rd line checking center who can put some decent points.
A long time ago, a baseball player remarked: "If I owned a ballclub, I'd hire a $5,000 coach and a $15,000 scout."
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Just for the kicks... if they wanted this badly, Pittsburgh can afford both Luongo and MAF this season. More than 8m in free cap space. Also: Brandon Sutter was among the "six for Cody". Excellent up and coming player on excellent contract, that's obvious. Experienced and excellent backup in Vokoun. I also remember that the Canucks were heavily interested in Beau Bennett in his draft year. Connecting the dots in a homerish way...
That said, if Pens are willing to go with 2 very good starters, why can't we?

That said, if Pens are willing to go with 2 very good starters, why can't we?
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Here's the problem with Bold Move Gillis, he needs to learn that you must always trade from a position of strength, when things are going well, the stock is high, in which he won't. Now's the time to pull the trigger.
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Apparently Sutter is NOT GETTING TRADED! This is was discussed on radio yesterday.mpp wrote:Just for the kicks... if they wanted this badly, Pittsburgh can afford both Luongo and MAF this season. More than 8m in free cap space. Also: Brandon Sutter was among the "six for Cody". Excellent up and coming player on excellent contract, that's obvious. Experienced and excellent backup in Vokoun. I also remember that the Canucks were heavily interested in Beau Bennett in his draft year. Connecting the dots in a homerish way...![]()
That said, if Pens are willing to go with 2 very good starters, why can't we?
"I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? - Plastics." - The Graduate
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
You mean like when he didn't trade a top young player for a 4th line/AHL tweener heading down the home stretch last year?RoyalDude wrote:Here's the problem with Bold Move Gillis, he needs to learn that you must always trade from a position of strength, when things are going well, the stock is high, in which he won't. Now's the time to pull the trigger.
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
SKYO wrote:At this point I'd rather keep Ballard and get rid of Garrison lol.
As Ballard and Tanev are the #1 pairing for the Canucks!
Too bad that's NOT going to happen though, but the way Ballard is playing and stock rising, we should be able to get a quality return, especially for the teams most pressing need - a 3rd line checking center who can put some decent points.
Yeah, outside of a shift with BXA last night, Ballard has looked great. Carrying the puck well. Clearing the zone. Playing off Tanev very well. But, that shift with BXA was effing brutal. 2 turn overs in under 20 seconds. The Killer B's must never be reformed

The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
I believe the field of teams is opening up nicely this season for GMMG to work with.
In the running of Need a Fricking Goalie are:
Toronto
Florida
Carolina
New Jersey - Brodeur is showing his age this season badly
Pittsburgh - MAF can, and should be bought out at the end of this season.
Washington
Phoenix
and there are still a few more on the fence. So, what would I like for Lou? Well, he is getting a little more expensive every day.
In the running of Need a Fricking Goalie are:
Toronto
Florida
Carolina
New Jersey - Brodeur is showing his age this season badly
Pittsburgh - MAF can, and should be bought out at the end of this season.
Washington
Phoenix
and there are still a few more on the fence. So, what would I like for Lou? Well, he is getting a little more expensive every day.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Perhaps Washington might not be in *discussions* with the Canucks after all.
http://canucksarmy.com/2013/2/5/mckenzi ... e-laganire

http://canucksarmy.com/2013/2/5/mckenzi ... e-laganire
McKenzie: Canucks Scouting Yale's Antoine Laganière
Over the weekend Mike Gillis and Laurence Gilman caused quite the stir by attending a Washington Capitals home game against the Pittsburgh Penguins on Super Bowl Sunday. The ensuing speculation led Gillis to ultimately apologize to to Washington Capital's General Manager McPhee (or if you prefer: GMMG apologized to GMGM), and McPhee ultimately complimented Gillis' class. I find all of that exceptionally boring.
More interesting, is the report from TSN's Bob McKenzie who appeared on the Team 1040 on Monday afternoon and said that the Canucks management team spent some of their time on the East Coast scouting Yale Bulldogs forward Antoine Laganière.
...
- Blob Mckenzie
- CC Legend
- Posts: 9345
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Garrison has been on for two goals against in 9 games. New team, new system. He will be fine. He is basically a bigger version of Hamhuis with a better shot.SKYO wrote:At this point I'd rather keep Ballard and get rid of Garrison lol.
As Ballard and Tanev are the #1 pairing for the Canucks!
Too bad that's NOT going to happen though, but the way Ballard is playing and stock rising, we should be able to get a quality return, especially for the teams most pressing need - a 3rd line checking center who can put some decent points.
TELL ME HOW MY ASS TASTES
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Speaking of Garrison, he needs a setup man for his one-timer. Edler seems to shoot more often than to pass. They are not very effective together on the powerplay.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Garrison has been on for two goals against in 9 games. New team, new system. He will be fine. He is basically a bigger version of Hamhuis with a better shot.SKYO wrote:At this point I'd rather keep Ballard and get rid of Garrison lol.
As Ballard and Tanev are the #1 pairing for the Canucks!
Too bad that's NOT going to happen though, but the way Ballard is playing and stock rising, we should be able to get a quality return, especially for the teams most pressing need - a 3rd line checking center who can put some decent points.
-
- CC Veteran
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
I agree. Would almost make sense to try a four forwards one D approach with Garrison to make him more of a focal point on the second power play.Jovocop wrote: Speaking of Garrison, he needs a setup man for his one-timer. Edler seems to shoot more often than to pass. They are not very effective together on the powerplay.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 15740
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
Agreed.Jovocop wrote: Speaking of Garrison, he needs a setup man for his one-timer. Edler seems to shoot more often than to pass. They are not very effective together on the powerplay.
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!
GO CANUCKS GO!!!
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 12337
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
We've seen this with a lot of players that come to Vancouver, whether it is training or injuries or whatever. It seems to take these guys quite a bit to get comfortable and get into Canucks hockey. GArrison is at least getting the ice time and PP opportunities to work out his stuff, rehabbing an injury over the summer.
The only HW the Canucks need
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 12337
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
So MG and Gillman are in the East scouting US College hockey. While there they are taking in some NHL games. After the internet buzz when they went to the Washington and Pittsburg game they have apologized to other GM's for the controversy and now inform the teams ahead of time that they will be there.
No Luongo scouting mission
No Luongo scouting mission
The only HW the Canucks need
- Uncle dans leg
- CC Legend
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo
He seems to be trying to do too much as far as controlling the puck instead of getting himself in position to unload that howitzer he possesses. Brian Cambell also is the king of assists. Playing a good puckmoving forward at the point on the PP to feed him would help too.
nobody forks...with the jesus