Reefer2 wrote:Have I missed anything or why is Tampa not in the picture?
Yes and run "Lindback" through the search engine good buddy.
Moderator: Referees
Reefer2 wrote:Have I missed anything or why is Tampa not in the picture?
Boston Canucker wrote:SKYO wrote:I like the Keith Jones analogy on NBC sports regarding Lu/Schneider."It's similar to the Brett Favre - Aaron Rodgers situation, move Favre, Rodgers takes over and wins the Superbowl.
As it just takes away all the conflict and whirlwind stories the media loves to conjure up.
Ultimately it lets Schneider know, no matter what, he's the #1 go to guy.
Yes, but they also know nothing - unsurprisingly - of the relationship between the two goalies. The other guy's comment about Luongo putting the knife in was stupid, uninformed, since Lou actually verbally backed up CS and by all accounts has been supportive of him. And Milbury's blaming AV for pulling him was typical wingnut city. Gillis can't tell the coach Luongo will be on the bench but you can't put him in...stupid. The game was lost anyway, but pulling CS was quite understandable.
Strangelove wrote:Reefer2 wrote:Have I missed anything or why is Tampa not in the picture?
Yes and run "Lindback" through the search engine good buddy.
Reefer2 wrote:Strangelove wrote:Reefer2 wrote:Have I missed anything or why is Tampa not in the picture?
Yes and run "Lindback" through the search engine good buddy.
You mean the goalie that has played a total of 40 NHL games, drafted 7th round and has a 2.58 GAA and a 0.913 SV%?
You still didn't answer the question
dbr wrote:So I don't know if this is taken out of context but TSN.ca is running a story in which they quote Gillis saying there is a potential deal in place, pending a mystery trade partner making a move with another one of their players.
This seems really out of character to me, I don't know if Gillis has just decided to throw this out in public for the hell of it or if the story is blowing some off-hand remark way out of proportion but something doesn't sit right.
dbr wrote:Right, of course.
Anyway I reiterate my .. befuddledness. I can't think of any other occasion on which Mike Gillis has disclosed anything even close to specific details about trade negotiations in public.
(Of course the Luongo situation is obviously unprecedented, but still.)
Reefer2 wrote:b) really does have a deal and is sending a message to other teams they have a few days to get the final offer in or he is gone
dbr wrote:I wonder if Gillis wasn't speaking in a much broader sense (in terms of timeframe - ie. something along the lines of 'we have a potential deal with a team that needs to make a compliance buy out to clear cap space,' in other words teams are talking to MG about acquiring Luongo this summer) than people are now inferring..
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests