Moderator: Referees
herb wrote:^ Why does it stank that way to you?
Because Barker is around? Or because there are 9D?
Unless Gillis needs the cap room to bring somebody in, I don't see the point.
Looks like the top two pairings are set (with Edler on the right side...ugh). Would we really go with a bottom pairing of Tanev and one of Alberts/Vandermeer/Barker? Yuck.
tantalum wrote:That to me or Doc?
herb wrote:^ Why does it stank that way to you?
Because Barker is around? Because there are 9D? Because Luongo is Agonzo imminently?
Unless Gillis needs the cap room to bring somebody in, I don't see the point.
Looks like the top two pairings are set (with Edler on the right side...ugh). Would we really go with a bottom pairing of Tanev and one of Alberts/Vandermeer/Barker? Yuck.
tantalum wrote:1) sneaking guys through waiver 2) continuing assessment or 3) trade. 1 or 2 are most likely IMO.
herb wrote:tantalum wrote:That to me or Doc?
That was meant for Doc, sorry.
I don't think a trade is up. Gillis wouldn've have staged an on air offensive against the Leafs and Toronto media earlier today if he was busy working on a trade.
9D is not sustainable, I agree.
RoyalDude wrote:Ya gotta love the Prospect Friendly environment for kids to grow and develop in the Gillis Regime. Schroeder has a good camp but AV pulls a chicken shit move and goes with the AMAZING Ebbett instead. Brutal
I can't wait til we see Vandemeer dressing as a forward. Ya just know that things are going bad when AV suggests that the beauty of Vandemeer is that he can play forward as well.

Strangelove wrote:Yeah, Lappy will get more icetime than Ebbett.

Cookie La Rue wrote:Strangelove wrote:Yeah, Lappy will get more icetime than Ebbett.
Are we brothers in space?![]()
Never thought we have the same thoughts (wrote that before i read that... red rat?) yeeehaw

Topper wrote:Is Jordan a cap move for maxing LITR protection with the opening day roster?
Users browsing this forum: BladesofSteel, CFP!, Google [Bot], herb and 3 guests