Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.
Moderator: Referees
Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
Topper wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Gillis only needs to hit a single as long as he cashes in a couple ducks. Hitting a home run is a crack pipe dream. You are trading a goalie who has had great regular seasons and is a horse. He is also 33 , signed for ten more seasons and has a pretty spotty record in big games. Hanging onto him for the whole year or beyond is asinine for several reasons. For one he could play lousy and start the descent into being a mediocre goalie and you are stuck with a big salary and nowhere to bury it. For another it could be a mindfuck to the kid the team would like to get behind and move forward with.
If someone can provide the Canucks with a young centre with upside who can immediately play in the top 9, a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder or a 2014 1st rounder he should be all over that trade. The longer the team hangs onto Roberto the worse it may get.
I would take Mathias , Shore/Petrovic and a 2nd or a 2014 1st.The Leafs have little I am interested in unless they part with Jake the Snake. It isn't getting any better than that. People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
Topper wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.
ESQ wrote:Topper wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.
Wait, are you being serious? Buyiung out a back-to-back-to-back-to-back 25 goal scorer? Who has consistently been in the top-20 Even Strength goal scorers for 4 years? Who has been in the top 50 goal scorers in the League for 4 years? And has missed all of 13 games in 6 years?
There is zero chance of Burrows being bought out. Of coursre, if you just said that to get a rise out of someone, I'm happy to oblige
ESQ wrote:There is zero chance of Burrows being bought out. Of coursre, if you just said that to get a rise out of someone, I'm happy to oblige
Hockey Widow wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:Gillis only needs to hit a single as long as he cashes in a couple ducks. Hitting a home run is a crack pipe dream. You are trading a goalie who has had great regular seasons and is a horse. He is also 33 , signed for ten more seasons and has a pretty spotty record in big games. Hanging onto him for the whole year or beyond is asinine for several reasons. For one he could play lousy and start the descent into being a mediocre goalie and you are stuck with a big salary and nowhere to bury it. For another it could be a mindfuck to the kid the team would like to get behind and move forward with.
If someone can provide the Canucks with a young centre with upside who can immediately play in the top 9, a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder or a 2014 1st rounder he should be all over that trade. The longer the team hangs onto Roberto the worse it may get.
I would take Mathias , Shore/Petrovic and a 2nd or a 2014 1st.The Leafs have little I am interested in unless they part with Jake the Snake. It isn't getting any better than that. People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.
This to me is the home run. So ya, if MG can get that then go for it but if not I say hang onto Luongo.
tantalum wrote:I think it's safe to assume that Gillis hasn't seen the "perfect" deal yet. Or a deal that brings the value he feels Luongo is worth. Or he feels that similar guys on offer could be grabbed for far less than a all-star starting goaltender.
It would seem to me then that the offers in Gillis' mind aren't going to get worse. He could move Luongo immediately if it came to that but it's at a value or with pieces coming back that don't help him. I see no real harm in waiting to see if the offers could get better PROVIDED it isn't proving to be a distraction to the team. Who knows, perhaps the Caps goaltending is terrible to start the year and they have a bit of a panic and move Johansson/Alzner along with Neuvirth/Holtby for Luongo plus something.
I just can't shake the feeling that Leafs will always be interested at the same price no longer how long Gillis waits. May as well wait to see what happens. But the Leafs have to be careful because if they wait to long they may not get the chance to add a Luongo to the roster. So I do believe that when the season starts up and a couple of teams have goaltending struggles there will be some pressure on Nonis to get something done before Luongo is lost to someone else. Double the pressure if the Leafs goaltending is struggling.
Diehard1 wrote:I just don't see No-nuts Nonis having the balls to pull off a deal for Luongo, again unless it's an absolute no brainer like the deal he got from Florida (where ownership told the GM they had to move Luongo now, so get the best deal he could). Nonis just won't do anything to rock the boat and it's why he's a very average GM. At least with Gillis, love him or hate him, you know he's got the balls to pull off a shocker trade like the Hodgson one last year.
tantalum wrote:Either way I sort of agree with Diehard...Luongo dropped into Nonis' lap (good on him for willingly receiving the asset), but Nonis never showed the willingness or ability to make the move which could either be a great success or a massive failure. He'll only make the Luongo move if he underpays or is forced to do so.
Users browsing this forum: dchrist2, Google Adsense [Bot], qubikal and 3 guests