So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Topper » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:47 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.

That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Topper
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 4266
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Blob Mckenzie » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:56 pm

Topper wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.

That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.


Now you're talking partial rebuild. Not opposed to sweeting the Luongo trade on this end if a future stud can be mined from wherever Luongo goes, but losing Burr at this point had best return a couple of young assets that slot top 9 right away and eventually are surefire top 6 forwards.

Keep in mind Booth looks like he could miss some time. If there ever was a year for the wheels to fall off this would be it I guess.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Hockey Widow » Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:14 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote:Gillis only needs to hit a single as long as he cashes in a couple ducks. Hitting a home run is a crack pipe dream. You are trading a goalie who has had great regular seasons and is a horse. He is also 33 , signed for ten more seasons and has a pretty spotty record in big games. Hanging onto him for the whole year or beyond is asinine for several reasons. For one he could play lousy and start the descent into being a mediocre goalie and you are stuck with a big salary and nowhere to bury it. For another it could be a mindfuck to the kid the team would like to get behind and move forward with.

If someone can provide the Canucks with a young centre with upside who can immediately play in the top 9, a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder or a 2014 1st rounder he should be all over that trade. The longer the team hangs onto Roberto the worse it may get.

I would take Mathias , Shore/Petrovic and a 2nd or a 2014 1st.The Leafs have little I am interested in unless they part with Jake the Snake. It isn't getting any better than that. People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.


This to me is the home run. So ya, if MG can get that then go for it but if not I say hang onto Luongo.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby ESQ » Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:51 pm

Topper wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.

That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.


Wait, are you being serious? Buyiung out a back-to-back-to-back-to-back 25 goal scorer? Who has consistently been in the top-20 Even Strength goal scorers for 4 years? Who has been in the top 50 goal scorers in the League for 4 years? And has missed all of 13 games in 6 years?

There is zero chance of Burrows being bought out. Of coursre, if you just said that to get a rise out of someone, I'm happy to oblige :lol:
ESQ
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby ukcanuck » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:03 pm

ESQ wrote:
Topper wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.

That is why I'd toss Burrows in the deal. It would also free up one of the two buyouts.


Wait, are you being serious? Buyiung out a back-to-back-to-back-to-back 25 goal scorer? Who has consistently been in the top-20 Even Strength goal scorers for 4 years? Who has been in the top 50 goal scorers in the League for 4 years? And has missed all of 13 games in 6 years?

There is zero chance of Burrows being bought out. Of coursre, if you just said that to get a rise out of someone, I'm happy to oblige :lol:


I'm thinking he meant that with the expected raise that Burrows is due, Gillis wont have to use a buy out to fit who ever would be coming back in a Luongo trade...

however I'm not sure I'd be happy with giving up Burrows, I don't put much stock in his points totals as they are most likely inflated a la Carter of a few years back, but there hasn't been clutch goal scorer like Burrows since Geoff Courtnall and the guy is all Canuck,,,well for a frenchman anyway
Last edited by ukcanuck on Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ukcanuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2147
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:04 am

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby BurningBeard » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:06 pm

ESQ wrote:There is zero chance of Burrows being bought out. Of coursre, if you just said that to get a rise out of someone, I'm happy to oblige :lol:

I wouldn't tweak my groin over it.
Every time I look out my window, same three dogs looking back at me.
User avatar
BurningBeard
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:02 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Diehard1 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:04 am

Hockey Widow wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Gillis only needs to hit a single as long as he cashes in a couple ducks. Hitting a home run is a crack pipe dream. You are trading a goalie who has had great regular seasons and is a horse. He is also 33 , signed for ten more seasons and has a pretty spotty record in big games. Hanging onto him for the whole year or beyond is asinine for several reasons. For one he could play lousy and start the descent into being a mediocre goalie and you are stuck with a big salary and nowhere to bury it. For another it could be a mindfuck to the kid the team would like to get behind and move forward with.

If someone can provide the Canucks with a young centre with upside who can immediately play in the top 9, a good young prospect and a 2nd rounder or a 2014 1st rounder he should be all over that trade. The longer the team hangs onto Roberto the worse it may get.

I would take Mathias , Shore/Petrovic and a 2nd or a 2014 1st.The Leafs have little I am interested in unless they part with Jake the Snake. It isn't getting any better than that. People thinking we will get a Huberdeau or Coutourier or Rielly need to check themselves.


This to me is the home run. So ya, if MG can get that then go for it but if not I say hang onto Luongo.


Agreed - what I mean about trading Lu now is you have to get some value for him - not saying it has to be Couturier, Bjugstad or somebody like that - but decent value. I don't think you need to get a top young player and a top prospect, but a guy who can play in the top 9 (even when Kesler is healthy) and a decent prospect works for me. Keep in mind it will also mean the Nucks have about $6 million in cap space without Lu here, depending on how much salary is coming back. That's a valuable asset too when your ownership has proven they are willing to spend it.
Diehard1
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:48 am

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby tantalum » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:33 am

I think it's safe to assume that Gillis hasn't seen the "perfect" deal yet. Or a deal that brings the value he feels Luongo is worth. Or he feels that similar guys on offer could be grabbed for far less than a all-star starting goaltender.

It would seem to me then that the offers in Gillis' mind aren't going to get worse. He could move Luongo immediately if it came to that but it's at a value or with pieces coming back that don't help him. I see no real harm in waiting to see if the offers could get better PROVIDED it isn't proving to be a distraction to the team. Who knows, perhaps the Caps goaltending is terrible to start the year and they have a bit of a panic and move Johansson/Alzner along with Neuvirth/Holtby for Luongo plus something.

I just can't shake the feeling that Leafs will always be interested at the same price no longer how long Gillis waits. May as well wait to see what happens. But the Leafs have to be careful because if they wait to long they may not get the chance to add a Luongo to the roster. So I do believe that when the season starts up and a couple of teams have goaltending struggles there will be some pressure on Nonis to get something done before Luongo is lost to someone else. Double the pressure if the Leafs goaltending is struggling.
User avatar
tantalum
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:41 am
Location: Carl Junction, MO

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Diehard1 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:51 pm

tantalum wrote:I think it's safe to assume that Gillis hasn't seen the "perfect" deal yet. Or a deal that brings the value he feels Luongo is worth. Or he feels that similar guys on offer could be grabbed for far less than a all-star starting goaltender.

It would seem to me then that the offers in Gillis' mind aren't going to get worse. He could move Luongo immediately if it came to that but it's at a value or with pieces coming back that don't help him. I see no real harm in waiting to see if the offers could get better PROVIDED it isn't proving to be a distraction to the team. Who knows, perhaps the Caps goaltending is terrible to start the year and they have a bit of a panic and move Johansson/Alzner along with Neuvirth/Holtby for Luongo plus something.

I just can't shake the feeling that Leafs will always be interested at the same price no longer how long Gillis waits. May as well wait to see what happens. But the Leafs have to be careful because if they wait to long they may not get the chance to add a Luongo to the roster. So I do believe that when the season starts up and a couple of teams have goaltending struggles there will be some pressure on Nonis to get something done before Luongo is lost to someone else. Double the pressure if the Leafs goaltending is struggling.


I just don't see No-nuts Nonis having the balls to pull off a deal for Luongo, again unless it's an absolute no brainer like the deal he got from Florida (where ownership told the GM they had to move Luongo now, so get the best deal he could). Nonis just won't do anything to rock the boat and it's why he's a very average GM. At least with Gillis, love him or hate him, you know he's got the balls to pull off a shocker trade like the Hodgson one last year.
Diehard1
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:48 am

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Meds » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:06 pm

One other thing to consider is that cap space may be even more valuable this summer when one considers the number of potentially worthwhile UFA's who will be looking for damned near any kind of work after being bought out. A guy like Gomez will probably be signed in the $2.5-$3.5M range.....no I don't think for a moment GMMG should consider him, but just an example of a guy who is totally overpaid but will likely be willing to sign somewhere for half of what he was making.

I think a guy like Mike Komisarek would be worth a look at $2.75-$3.25M.....he's not worth the $4.5M he's currently making, but at 31 years old, a 6' 4", 240lb, blueliner with a big right handed shot is definitely worth considering. I would certainly look at him as a potential partner for a young, smaller, and less physical, Connauton. Especially if re-signing Edler proves to be problematic.
User avatar
Meds
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2758
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby dbr » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:13 pm

Even on one of the worst defensive teams in the league last year, Mike Komisarek averaged less ice time than four other defensemen.

And it's not like he did anything with that ice time, either (hell if you accept what the advanced stats folks are selling he was the worst defenseman on that team).

I think Mike Komisarek gets another NHL contract but if it's a multi million dollar deal it's going to be from some loser franchise like the Islanders or the Oilers.

..

I'm not sure what I think about this year's UFA market. On the one hand a lot of players are probably going to try to test the market, and other interesting players may end up being bought out.

On the other hand, you can bet the big money franchises with even mediocre contracts on the books are going to look at buying them out to give themselves enough money to get in the game.

A lot of big spending teams with a lot of money to play with probably means there won't be any great deals to be had.
dbr
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Hockey Widow » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:48 pm

Diehard1 wrote:I just don't see No-nuts Nonis having the balls to pull off a deal for Luongo, again unless it's an absolute no brainer like the deal he got from Florida (where ownership told the GM they had to move Luongo now, so get the best deal he could). Nonis just won't do anything to rock the boat and it's why he's a very average GM. At least with Gillis, love him or hate him, you know he's got the balls to pull off a shocker trade like the Hodgson one last year.



Actually I don't think that is what happened. Mike Keenan went rogue on that one. He had taken Luongo to arbitration the year before and had been refusing to give Luongo his big time contract. Keenan didn't think he had shown enough to be paid like a top 10 goalie in the league. Luongo had one more year before UFA. Ownership wanted Luongo signed. Luongo thought he had a deal, had begun construction of his home. Keenan decided that he wanted to impress upon everyone that he ran the organization and he also had a boner for Bert.

It was the opposite of what you sate. Keenan traded Luongo and even rushed making the announcement. Nonis wanted to wait until the draft floor to announce but Keenan wanted it rushed through and announced. He eventually lost his job because of stuff like that.

Martin was the coach at the time and his days in Ottawa were hampered by lack of consistent goaltending. He was in dream land having Luongo on his team and the thought of what it would be like to have a world class net minder back stop the club. He talked about this a few years later. He was in the camp to get Luongo signed long term when he heard about the trade.

So the coach wanted him, ownership wanted him, the fans wanted him, it was the GM that felt it was an unproven player playing hard ball and he needed to be shown how the NHL works. Listen to Keenan when he talks about it. He talks about how Luongo's head was a little bigger than his accomplishments.

At the time we gave up a washed up power forward, at the time a d'man who was thought to be top 4 and a back up goalie who had decent numbers for the Canucks.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby tantalum » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:53 pm

Either way I sort of agree with Diehard...Luongo dropped into Nonis' lap (good on him for willingly receiving the asset), but Nonis never showed the willingness or ability to make the move which could either be a great success or a massive failure. He'll only make the Luongo move if he underpays or is forced to do so.
User avatar
tantalum
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:41 am
Location: Carl Junction, MO

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby Hockey Widow » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:23 pm

tantalum wrote:Either way I sort of agree with Diehard...Luongo dropped into Nonis' lap (good on him for willingly receiving the asset), but Nonis never showed the willingness or ability to make the move which could either be a great success or a massive failure. He'll only make the Luongo move if he underpays or is forced to do so.



Agreed Tant. Luongo landed on his lap no question. And I also remember his reluctance to make major moves along the lines of a Holmgren.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: So, who would you like in a return for Luongo

Postby herb » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:55 pm

I gave Nonis credit for landing Luongo. Keenan could have unloaded him elsewhere, and for some reason he chose to trade with Vancouver.

One thing Nonis and Burke have in common is that they're very good at justifying why they didn't do something. How many times did we endure these two saying "I will not overpay for a goaltender/second line forward...blah blah blah"?

If Gillis' goal is to acquire some help for the here and now, then obviously Luongo needs to be traded asap.

If Gillis' goal is to acquire futures in the form of draft picks and/or prospects, then he is probably better served by waiting out the season and seeing if there are more suitors in the off season. It's not like a guy like Bjugstad, for example, would be much help this season, so what's the rush? I think it's highly unlikely that Florida and Toronto will remove themselves from the Luongo sweepstakes if this thing drags on into the off season, so Gillis does have some manoeuvrability.

The thing that gets me, is that if I'm Dave Nonis I am itching to get into the playoffs this season for the sake of some job security. If there was ever a time he could be afforded some leeway and 'benefit of the doubt' in terms of potentially overpaying, you would think it would be in the department of solidifying the goaltending position, right?
User avatar
herb
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Mars

PreviousNext

Return to Canucks Corner Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], qubikal and 4 guests