Per wrote:You don't think Läck is ready to step up? It's what, a 48 game season?
Pretty sure Lack is injured (out for a month?).
But either way, Schneids would need a veteran back-up imo.
Moderator: Referees
Per wrote:You don't think Läck is ready to step up? It's what, a 48 game season?
Strangelove wrote:Per wrote:You don't think Läck is ready to step up? It's what, a 48 game season?
Pretty sure Lack is injured (out for a month?).
But either way, Schneids would need a veteran back-up imo.
Strangelove wrote:Per wrote:You don't think Läck is ready to step up? It's what, a 48 game season?
Pretty sure Lack is injured (out for a month?).
But either way, Schneids would need a veteran back-up imo.
Eddy Punch Clock wrote:Strangelove wrote:Per wrote:You don't think Läck is ready to step up? It's what, a 48 game season?
Pretty sure Lack is injured (out for a month?).
But either way, Schneids would need a veteran back-up imo.
Raycroft would be a serviceable option to share back up duties with Lack.
Schneider- 30 games
Raycroft- 9 games
Lack- 9 games
Something along those lines anyways.

Hank wrote:the Dogsalmon wrote:we now own Cam Barker...1 year...700,000K...i was just reading an article about him approximately 1 hour ago...it was about what a total failure his career has been...now we got him...makes ya go hmmmm...
Is this a 1-way contract? Didn't we already go down this road with the "worse-defenceman-ever" twice with MAG and Parent? Just watch AV play him over Ballard

Topper wrote:Where were you when I was teaching Lever how to use quotes.
Canuck-One wrote:
<a href=http://download.cnet.com/YouTube-To-MP3/3000-2071_4-75810474.html >youtube to mp3</a>
Aaronp18 wrote:Diapers.
tantalum wrote:put in the training camp thread but Booth tweaked his groin and is going to get a MRI. tweaked and MRI don't usually go hand in hand.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests