
Moderator: Referees

Per wrote:Fred wrote: Rather than buy a NHL franchise just investing your down payment you can do a lot better by simply investing. Think if you invested in gold 10 years ago would that be better or worse than buying a NHL team.
Hockey is not about making money, it's about winning cups!
Fred wrote:Per wrote:Fred wrote: Rather than buy a NHL franchise just investing your down payment you can do a lot better by simply investing. Think if you invested in gold 10 years ago would that be better or worse than buying a NHL team.
Hockey is not about making money, it's about winning cups!
To the guy that has to bank roll the franchise it better be about money first and fore most or he'll soon find himself in the hands of a bankruptcy court. Risk manement, is what it's about !! Only one cup issued every season the chnaces are 30-1 you loose not great odds, for some it's just a hope they'll be back next season.
ukcanuck wrote:what about using a loss in one of your business to write off profits in another part?
Sports Franchises are high risk to begin with but are not about hard cash, their value is speculative and the money that is used to purchase it is on paper too. when you talk about risk you seem to confuse real risk- losing hard currency real assets, with speculative risk, paper assets...
the Dogsalmon wrote:Karl,Josef and UK???
ukcanuck wrote:the Dogsalmon wrote:Karl,Josef and UK???
Josef!? Josef wasn't a Marxist...
And neither am I, I just fiulkin hate supporting rich cawck sukkers who fuck with hockey.
You don't here me bitch about sweat shops, out sourcing or importing Chinese workers to steal jobs from Topper and Blob do ya ?
Fred wrote:
I can't believe any one wrote that.
It doesn't matter how you raise your equity YOU MUST put up and risk assets of equal value. NO one gives you money. You might use for instance your house ( i don't advise it ) but it must be clear of debt, or a first call for it and to be used and if it or your franchise fails there must be assets available for the bank to re-possess.
A wise man manages his risk like it was gold.
When you come to the time for your pay cheque you expect to be paid, the same goes for the players, the city council with it's taxes, the Cdn/USA Government the popcorn salesman, etc etc No one is doing this for nothing. Is this union think, money is free some how "these business managemnt type" just defraud and steal money.
Let me say this a business man is not abusiness man long if he has a history of failure. Remember Nelson Skalbania he's an example of some one who didn't manage risk well.
Thankfully for you Union pension funds are run by people who manage risk very well and that's also why they don't invest in speculative NHL franchises .....it's a mugs game![]()
the Dogsalmon wrote:ukcanuck wrote:the Dogsalmon wrote:Karl,Josef and UK???
Josef!? Josef wasn't a Marxist...
And neither am I, I just fiulkin hate supporting rich cawck sukkers who fuck with hockey.
You don't here me bitch about sweat shops, out sourcing or importing Chinese workers to steal jobs from Topper and Blob do ya ?
didnt say he was...you misread something else into it...again...
herb wrote:ukcanuck wrote:what about using a loss in one of your business to write off profits in another part?
Just one factual interjection.
You talk out of your derriere a lot, so I'm not really surprised, but this is not at all how corporate taxation works.
Carry on bickering amongst yourselves. NHL and NHLPA can suck it.
ukcanuck wrote:herb wrote:ukcanuck wrote:what about using a loss in one of your business to write off profits in another part?
Just one factual interjection.
You talk out of your derriere a lot, so I'm not really surprised, but this is not at all how corporate taxation works.
Carry on bickering amongst yourselves. NHL and NHLPA can suck it.
Well how does it work then ?
Why do some corporations run some things at a loss deliberately?
Exactly and the players just want the make whole provision that protects the contracts that they signed in good faith and contract terms they received as compensation for accepting the salary cap and the 24 % roll back they gave last time.
Is that the same wise man who visited baby Jesus or the one who has the same chance of getting into heaven as a camel does passing through the eye of a needle?
Cause I think Nelson was the latter. ... And you want a system to protect guys like that.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], NzVanFan and 1 guest