Moderator: Referees
Hockey Widow wrote:And yet you have a team like Minnesota, that showed an operating loss, sign two of the biggest deals in the off season, now crying that they need a new deal to be competitive. And they can't make whole. This is the part that irks me. These deals that were not negotiated or signed in good faith by the owners who knew that they would be trying to weasel out of them. Everyone, including Uncle Dan's Leg, knew that the signing push was all about beating the deadline for the expiring CBA yet the owners still engaged in this frenzy knowing they had no intention of honouring the deals.
Hockey Widow wrote: Everyone, including Uncle Dan's Leg, knew that the signing push was all about beating the deadline for the expiring CBA yet the owners still engaged in this frenzy knowing they had no intention of honouring the deals.
dbr wrote:Apparently the league has proposed a meeting between owners and players with no league or PA personnel involved.
Taking it a step further it would be interesting to see a group of owners and a group of NHLPA team reps sit down to try to hammer things out, with input from each side as to who is chosen so the league doesn't just send their eight hard liners into the room.
It seems pretty clear that this negotiation has been hijacked by hard liners, and getting some of them out of the discussion while hopefully adding some more moderate voices on each side could result in progress.
dbr wrote:The players pretty clearly knew this as well.
dbr wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:And yet you have a team like Minnesota, that showed an operating loss, sign two of the biggest deals in the off season, now crying that they need a new deal to be competitive. And they can't make whole. This is the part that irks me. These deals that were not negotiated or signed in good faith by the owners who knew that they would be trying to weasel out of them. Everyone, including Uncle Dan's Leg, knew that the signing push was all about beating the deadline for the expiring CBA yet the owners still engaged in this frenzy knowing they had no intention of honouring the deals.
The players pretty clearly knew this as well.
Hockey Widow wrote:dbr wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:And yet you have a team like Minnesota, that showed an operating loss, sign two of the biggest deals in the off season, now crying that they need a new deal to be competitive. And they can't make whole. This is the part that irks me. These deals that were not negotiated or signed in good faith by the owners who knew that they would be trying to weasel out of them. Everyone, including Uncle Dan's Leg, knew that the signing push was all about beating the deadline for the expiring CBA yet the owners still engaged in this frenzy knowing they had no intention of honouring the deals.
The players pretty clearly knew this as well.
Which is why I said:
"And the other side of that equation seems to be a major stumbling block by those high paid long term players that want a make whole. They too knew that the CBA was expiring and that there was a high probability that a roll back or cap drop or something was going to hit them. They are all disingenuous, players and owners."

dbr wrote:Well if I hadn't glazed over that the first time, my response to your post would seem pretty frickin pointless then, wouldn't it...
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Per, the lockout was the ONLY move. What were the owners supposed to do ? Play out the season until March and then have the players go on strike after they made 90% of their salaries. Anyone with a half a brain in their head knows this would have been a horrible move by the owners and it would have shifted all the leverage to the players. Donald Fehr has and would take great glee in pulling the pin on the season to enforce his will on the owners. He is the same cunt that destroyed the 1994 MLB season 2/3 of the way through.
Per wrote:
So what ace does Bettman have up his sleave now?![]()
He started the poker game by playing his best card, and it apparently did not have the effect he hoped for.
What next?
ukcanuck wrote:Blob Mckenzie wrote:Per, the lockout was the ONLY move. What were the owners supposed to do ? Play out the season until March and then have the players go on strike after they made 90% of their salaries. Anyone with a half a brain in their head knows this would have been a horrible move by the owners and it would have shifted all the leverage to the players. Donald Fehr has and would take great glee in pulling the pin on the season to enforce his will on the owners. He is the same cunt that destroyed the 1994 MLB season 2/3 of the way through.
I think you are putting to much importance on the Baseball strike, it was a different battle with different circumstances, and Fehr is smart enough to know it.
Besides as it stands, this forum aside, the players have all the public good will (such as it is.) Had they started the season on time a strike by the players in the spring canceling the playoffs would have been a nightmare PR move on the players part and the Fans would not be holding the league in such contempt.
In such a scenario when they do get back playing there wouldn't be near the backlash that is gonna come from this lockout.
Users browsing this forum: Aisha, Boston Canucker, dbr, Google [Bot], mathonwy, MSN [Bot], qubikal, rockalt and 7 guests