Strangelove wrote:Colour me over-optimistic but I smell a tentative agreement within days!
Okay, now I can taste it, deal by Friday, you have my personal guarantee.
Moderator: Referees
Strangelove wrote:Colour me over-optimistic but I smell a tentative agreement within days!
rats19 wrote:Toad Lickers....
Tiger wrote:Meds wrote:As for the pensions and shit.....ummm.....helloooo.....you just made more money in a 10 year career than the average person is going to make in their entire life. If you invested a tenth of it wisely you are going to draw more of a pension from interest than most people will get from their actual pension plans. I'm not OK with government officials getting the pensions they are "entitled to", definitely not going to be OK with a hockey player griping about not getting enough of a pension.
OK I am an old fart but in 40 years of working I didn't make as much as some hockey players make in 1 year let alone 10..
Getting a little tired of listening to the "union" crap . This is about greed not fairness or need.. Some of the owners go broke over the years but the players get to live the dream and are very well compensated .. Sorry, I have very little compassion for the "poor downtrodden " players..
if they did go broke they probably deserved it.
Tiger wrote:UK Canuck said:if they did go broke they probably deserved it.
Hope you can explain that one?? or is it just a normal commie rat rant?
ukcanuck wrote:Tiger wrote:UK Canuck said:if they did go broke they probably deserved it.
Hope you can explain that one?? or is it just a normal commie rat rant?
I was thinking of McNall and his jail tax fraud or whatever it was.
(And there is a world of difference between a union man and a commie rat, ask a teamster if you are in doubt)
Tiger wrote: Jimmie Hoffa ?? ok a rat gangster ... but so far you been quoting pure Marx.. Unions were for fairness and need. not bucks and greed
ukcanuck wrote:Tiger wrote: Jimmie Hoffa ?? ok a rat gangster ... but so far you been quoting pure Marx.. Unions were for fairness and need. not bucks and greed
greed cuts both ways and if we are gonna be insulted by greed, then you ought to be more insulted by the billionaires greed rather than the millionaires. As for fairness well we might have to agree to disagree cause I've already said the owners enjoy their lofty position due to a crooked system.
the Dogsalmon wrote:ukcanuck wrote:Tiger wrote: Jimmie Hoffa ?? ok a rat gangster ... but so far you been quoting pure Marx.. Unions were for fairness and need. not bucks and greed
greed cuts both ways and if we are gonna be insulted by greed, then you ought to be more insulted by the billionaires greed rather than the millionaires. As for fairness well we might have to agree to disagree cause I've already said the owners enjoy their lofty position due to a crooked system.
quite possibly the owners who are rich work 10x as hard as the union guys...ever seen a government employee working at full steam?...gov't full steam is the same as full stop in the private sector...
ukcanuck wrote:First off I am a government employee and it took 6 years of university to qualify for the job and another 5 years to learn to be good at it and quite frankly I doubt if the average person would be able to tell if I'm doing a good job or bad one. There is a whole field of study based on the effects of what my industry has on society and the smartest most educated people on the planet can't decide what's the diagnosis and prognosis till decades after the fact.

dbr wrote:ukcanuck wrote:First off I am a government employee and it took 6 years of university to qualify for the job and another 5 years to learn to be good at it and quite frankly I doubt if the average person would be able to tell if I'm doing a good job or bad one. There is a whole field of study based on the effects of what my industry has on society and the smartest most educated people on the planet can't decide what's the diagnosis and prognosis till decades after the fact.
So basically by the time we figure out just how useless you are, you'll be collecting your pension.
Topper wrote:After reading Steve Fehr's three things, the one that stood out was who covers the cost of the lockout.
Appears players are looking to get compensated for games cancelled.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests