
Moderator: Referees

Booth "Hockey come back so people can stop complaining about Booth. A lot of hockey players & people in general HUNT! Your just being ignorant, have a problem go join a club that is against hunting & do something about it because honestly facebook won't get your opinion heard."
Uncle dans leg wrote:

Madcombinepilot wrote:(the original picture) is a great trophie! prolly the second hardest to get! and done with the bow, great job!
Tiger wrote:Madcombinepilot wrote:(the original picture) is a great trophie! prolly the second hardest to get! and done with the bow, great job!
+ 1..
Yep. he deserves bragging rights.. and his Elk looked good too.. Killing bears is a good thing in Alberta !! Getting a little tired of listening to city dumb fuks bitchin and whining about something they know nothing about..
Tiger wrote:Madcombinepilot wrote:(the original picture) is a great trophie! prolly the second hardest to get! and done with the bow, great job!
+ 1..
Yep. he deserves bragging rights.. and his Elk looked good too.. Killing bears is a good thing in Alberta !! Getting a little tired of listening to city dumb fuks bitchin and whining about something they know nothing about..
Topper wrote:ClamRussel wrote:Booth's already come out stated he's doing this for trophy hunting.
Booth referred to the goat as a trophy. That is what they are called in hunting. The same rules apply for usage of meat and skin. Baiting is not allowed for goats and blinds would be completely ineffective so your insinuation (http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=151682#p151682) that he used those methods is yet another fallacy in your continued diatribe.
In fact goat hunting is by far the closest to you preferred take on hunting. (http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=151682#p151682)You're forgetting the key part of hunting ....the "hunt". Going out to the wilderness and searching for your own. Thats hunting.
But then, with your background and experience, you should already have possessed that knowledge.ClamRussel wrote:I've already stated my comments had nothing to do with hunting for meat so I won't address that.
These animals are hunted for meat. To do otherwise is illegal. Maybe you didn't know that and that is why you backed off the topic. They are also hunted for their skins (trophies but I know you don't like that word) and again, to do otherwise is illegal. Do you own a leather coat or wallet Clam? I have some lovely mother of pearl on my mantle piece, the animal was used for chowder.ClamRussel wrote:I haven't "attacked" anyone's views that are different than mine. Quite the contrary, people who favour these hunting practices have done the personal attacks.
Really? (http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=151213#p151213) Maybe it is your way of debating to accuse others creating strawmen. Good ol LBJ. Repeatedly, by myself, Coco and Carlyee, the fallacies and errors that you base your views upon have been exposed and without a basis for your views, those views are ignorant.ClamRussel wrote:If someone doesn't agree with Booth they are called ignorant.
As I saidYou have done nothing in this thread but advertise your ignorance of modern hunting, your preference for inhumane hunting practises, your complete disregard for hunter safety and your lack of knowledge of the laws governing hunting.
That is stating fact. Would you prefer the euphemism "lack of knowledge"?ClamRussel wrote: The only ignorance going on here is assuming to know a person's background and experience without knowledge.
Oh please Clam, tell us of that vast hunting background and experience that you possess because it certainly isn't shown in any of your posts in this thread.
Are we expected to bow down to this background, experience and knowledge of the unknown unknown you claim to have, because you certainly haven't demonstrated any of it.
Tiger wrote:So on our "politically correct " local radio show an environmentalist .. fish and game type was interviewed about his
proposal.. it ran like this.. The northern wolves are now a menace to the caribou herds so its being proposed to build an 800 mile fence ( line north of Ft Mcmurray ) to protect the Caribou ( cost estimate about 40 million to build .. 3 million annual maintenance ).. WTF??????? No Caribou for the wolves so they gotta eat kids ????
Put a bounty on the damn wolves .. Invite Booth and Tiger Williams ( another noted hunter/fisherman ) to bring their crossbows or rifles and enjoy the hunt.. Cost to Canada = Chump Change.. and far more effective..
okcanuck wrote:After the events today is there anyone on this board that can explain to me why the US doesn't need some kind of gun restrictions?

okcanuck wrote:After the events today is there anyone on this board that can explain to me why the US doesn't need some kind of gun restrictions?
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-1 ... n-in-China
Man stabs 22 primary school students in a knife attack in China on Friday, officials said, the latest in a series of assaults.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Eddy Punch Clock, Google [Bot], Mondi and 3 guests