Moderator: Referees
Listercat wrote:The average person's annual income in Canada is $46K. The lowest paid NHLer's earn in excess of $500K a year. Darcy Hordichuk for example has been in the NHL for the past 6 years and has earned an average of about $675K pa or a little over $4 mil in that time. The "average" wage earner would have to work 86 years to accomplish that. Even at $100K per year they would have to work 40 years.
I take issue with anyone who feels their "career", if it ends in 6 years or 10 years should allow them to "retire". Whether its politicians or athletes it should piss off the working slob that is expected to pay for it.
coco_canuck wrote:
It'd be nice if I didn't have to hold your hand through your own pseudo-intellectual arguments.
First you were arguing a difference in kind, and now you've capitulated to a difference in degree position that's on just as shaky ground.
You fail to recognize that your statement that " the opportunity and path to pro sports is open to anyone regardless of class or stature" comes with a necessary condition that you minimize, and that' the endowed genetic/athletic ability that would allow, in a theoretical vacum, anyone in any class or stature to make it to pro sports. By definition, that becomes an exclusive club that is only open to those that fit that necessary condition.
What you also fail to specify is that all sports are not readily open to anyone in any class or stature since some sports are costly to participate in, i.e. hockey, golf, many olympic level sports etc.
So, the only way your exhaustive and general statement holds true is if all sports are created equal, and are open to anyone in any class or stature.
What you also take for granted is the ability to move into big business without having much stature nor being part of an affluent social class. If an individual is endowed with great intelligence and an innovative mind, that person can conquer big business without being born into affluence.
Your arguments really are terrible and inconsistent. You bend your argument to appease the situation, but you still fail to realize that your entire form of argumentation has been fatally flawed throughout this discussion.
ukcanuck wrote:Maybe, but they are arguments while what you seem to be doing is cherry pick to suit yourself, and bury people in esoteric language preloaded with condescension and derision.

ukcanuck wrote:Could you split a hair any finer? Your missing the forest for the trees, the argument for anyone who hasn't fallen asleep yet is that the players should be as entitled to their split of the cash cow as the owners because the work and the effort and the and the luck and the genetic ability and the kitchen sink it takes to get there is as at least as valid an entitlement as the owning of a franchise.
ukcanuck wrote:I'm not taking that for granted, I concede that there has been the odd "Mozart" or genius case and a few shit-house luck got rich success stories out there but for the most part what I am saying that is so rare its hardly worth mentioning...
ukcanuck wrote:Maybe, but they are arguments while what you seem to be doing is cherry pick to suit yourself, and bury people in esoteric language preloaded with condescension and derision.
which is a shame because for the most part your arguments would be more entertaining and enlightening without the backhandedness.
Meds wrote:It's true.![]()
Coco's posts are often loaded with big words that can be difficult for the average joe to understand.
You know, if his first language is Swahili.![]()
Esoteric language.....
ukcanuck wrote:Would that argument include the fact that the path to the board room goes right through private high schools, prep schools and elite universities that are not open to the general public and require not only money but the right connections and leverage to attend? Because if that argument doesn't have an answer for that, then its not going to be very convincing.
Topper wrote:Cardboardbox
Potatoe1 wrote:ukcanuck wrote:Would that argument include the fact that the path to the board room goes right through private high schools, prep schools and elite universities that are not open to the general public and require not only money but the right connections and leverage to attend? Because if that argument doesn't have an answer for that, then its not going to be very convincing.
Where do you come up with this crap....
As someone who did a business degree and looked closely at doing an MBA, I can tell you point blank that you are talking out your ass.
ukcanuck wrote:I think you threw that in my face before but it means nothing, public colleges and mickey mouse universities puke out thousands of MBA's every year most of which end up working for the man or posting in fan forum sites.
Topper wrote:Cardboardbox
I can use big words too.
UK reminds me of a blonde pubescent school girl with a genetic fear of three syllable words.
ukcanuck wrote:
I think you threw that in my face before but it means nothing, public colleges and mickey mouse universities puke out thousands of MBA's every year most of which end up working for the man or posting in fan forum sites.
coco_canuck wrote:ukcanuck wrote:I think you threw that in my face before but it means nothing, public colleges and mickey mouse universities puke out thousands of MBA's every year most of which end up working for the man or posting in fan forum sites.
What about you?
A devote follower of the man's hobby.
Users browsing this forum: Arbour, Eddy Punch Clock, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 4 guests