Moderator: Referees
Blob wrote: shitty money
ukcanuck wrote:And in such a comparison, although I have seen neither in the flesh, is Cowboys Stadium three times the building that BC Place is? Just askin..
dbr wrote:ukcanuck wrote:And in such a comparison, although I have seen neither in the flesh, is Cowboys Stadium three times the building that BC Place is? Just askin..
Well given you are saying we shouldn't compare apples to oranges, maybe comparing a reno to a completely new building is not the best way to put the cost of BC Place's new roof in perspective.
Anyway, Cowboys stadium has capacity for 110 000 and seats 25 000 more than BC Place does (80 000 to under 55 000) so they are not comparable buildings beyond both housing football teams.
I'd take Cowboys Stadium at $1.3b over a $563m roof (and if you include the 2009 phase of renos we're actually talking about $720m) from a pure bang-for-the-buck standpoint.
If you take the difference in the size of the businesses occupying the buildings its even more lopsided, some quick googling suggests the Cowobys revenue is triple that of the entire CFL.
I guess you could justify the expense of BC Place on the grounds that Vancouver needs a 50 000 seat stadium but I don't really agree with that. Anyway whatever, what's another few hundred million dollars of public money, amirite?

dbr wrote: Anyway whatever, what's another few hundred million dollars of public money, amirite?
So fukin great it actually made me log on and post which i have little motivation to do anymore.


donlever wrote:dbr wrote: Anyway whatever, what's another few hundred million dollars of public money, amirite?
Awesome dbr. LOFL!
So fukin great it actually made me log on and post which i have little motivation to do anymore.
Well played sir.
GODS STADIUM IN ARLINGTON
Cost of Construction $1.15 billion
Stadium Financing City sales tax increased by one-half of a percent, the hotel occupancy tax by 2 percent, and car rental tax by 5 percent. The City of Arlington provided $325 million in funding, and Jerry Jones covered any cost overruns. Also, the NFL provided the Cowboys with an additional $150 million.
And yes, it is 3 times the building that BC Place is.
To start.
dbr wrote:ukcanuck wrote:And in such a comparison, although I have seen neither in the flesh, is Cowboys Stadium three times the building that BC Place is? Just askin..
I guess you could justify the expense of BC Place on the grounds that Vancouver needs a 50 000 seat stadium but I don't really agree with that. Anyway whatever, what's another few hundred million dollars of public money, amirite?
donlever wrote:dbr wrote: Anyway whatever, what's another few hundred million dollars of public money, amirite?
Awesome dbr. LOFL!
So fukin great it actually made me log on and post which i have little motivation to do anymore.
Well played sir.
ukcanuck wrote:(Not betraying any bias in calling it God's instead of Cowboy stadium at all?)
I don't know what the deal was or is for BC place but tax dollars are tax dollars and the figures you list for God's Stadium doesn't say how much the public paid vs how much is private and who owns the thing nor who gets the profits over time?
I mean if all the tax money invested in it amounts to a loan for Jerry Jones what's so great about that versus BC place?
If ones a white elephant and the other is a shrine, it sure looks like its because the NFL makes more money than the CFL ?
ukcanuck wrote:I guess that's a fair statement, except I might counter that if we were discussing building a stadium that didn't exist maybe Vancouver doesn't need a 50,000 seat stadium but we aren't. we're talking about investing in keeping an asset that we would lose both the original investment and the use of the facility without.
saying its only boat shows and the CFL is understating both and ignoring many more events that take place there.
ukcanuck wrote:In a more personal question though why the hate on for the CFL? I get that some Canadian football fans prefer the American game, it's smaller field and 4 downs make for a harder hitting slower paced intense game.
I get that some would be attracted to the hype of the NFL machine and fall for the Hollywood factor.
dbr wrote:
Hah, thanks. I would consider myself to be pretty far left of center (just like uk by comparison to most on these boards) but even I have my limits..
Anyway nice to see you. And not just because you showed up to acknowledge my brilliance.![]()
dbr wrote:ukcanuck wrote:(Not betraying any bias in calling it God's instead of Cowboy stadium at all?)
Donnie is a pretty notorious Cowboys fan uk, but even so I am fairly sure the nomenclature is tongue in cheek.
dbr wrote:
His post said $325m from the city, I don't know how (or if) they split up the pie but that's less than half what the province has spent on BC Place in the last three years.
UKcanuck wrote: mean if all the tax money invested in it amounts to a loan for Jerry Jones what's so great about that versus BC place?
dbr wrote:They spent half as much and got a vastly superior facility (from scratch) to what we got for our public dollars. And yes it is entirely because Cowboy Stadium meets a business need (ie. a place where you can charge 80 000 people top dollar to walk in the door once a week) where BC Place absolutely does not.
dbr wrote:
Honestly I did not pay much attention to the whole saga, but I think it's probably excessive to say that the fine folks of British Columbia would have lost the use of the facility if they didn't drop almost three quarters of a billion dollars on it. As for the original investment.. what's that saying about throwing good money after bad?
Anyway like I said I haven't studiously followed the proceedings around the renovation but I seem to recall reading someone's suggestion that the province could tear down BC Place, sell the land to developers and build a more appropriately sized venue at Hastings Park for vastly less.
dbr wrote:
Look at what's on the schedule for BC Place for the next few months. September is two Lions and two Whitecaps games. October is the same and they have the BC Home and Design Show for four days. November their only concrete dates are one Lions game and a Paul McCartney tour.
(Paul's playing a ton of venues smaller than Rogers Arena by the looks of it so I don't know what we'd be missing out on.)
You can't even get a December calendar for BC Place on their site, I don't know if that's because there is legitimately nothing going on or what.
Island Nucklehead wrote:ukcanuck wrote:In a more personal question though why the hate on for the CFL? I get that some Canadian football fans prefer the American game, it's smaller field and 4 downs make for a harder hitting slower paced intense game.
I get that some would be attracted to the hype of the NFL machine and fall for the Hollywood factor.
For me it's the athletes. The NFL is unquestionably the best of the best at their sport.
The CFL game format is superior. But the NFL is where the talent is.
Maybe it's something like comparing European hockey (big ice) vs NHL hockey (small ice). Someone might think the big ice is better to watch, but it's hard to argue that the NHL has the better hockey players.
ukcanuck wrote:Island Nucklehead wrote:ukcanuck wrote:In a more personal question though why the hate on for the CFL? I get that some Canadian football fans prefer the American game, it's smaller field and 4 downs make for a harder hitting slower paced intense game.
I get that some would be attracted to the hype of the NFL machine and fall for the Hollywood factor.
For me it's the athletes. The NFL is unquestionably the best of the best at their sport.
The CFL game format is superior. But the NFL is where the talent is.
Maybe it's something like comparing European hockey (big ice) vs NHL hockey (small ice). Someone might think the big ice is better to watch, but it's hard to argue that the NHL has the better hockey players.
I have no argument that the best of the best is what the NFL Is all about, the CFL is by no means anywhere near the machine that the NFL is, but I don't get how some can't spit out the words Canadian Football League like it's some kind of abomination.
It may be small time by comparison to the NFl but the C stands for Canadian, how could it be anything more than a small time version of the NFL ? And BTW it represents towns and regions that will probably never be big enough to have a NFL
team.
Why go out ones way to disparage a Canadian institution just because it's not your cup of tea?
Users browsing this forum: Boston Canucker, Google [Bot], jackalman and 7 guests