Topper wrote:So some one else did.
That is the case throughout the league. That is why Suter and Parise held their auctions for services.
If the owners decided not to pay up, that is collusion.
I was under the impression collusion would exist if collectively owners co-operate to keep contracts artificially low. But anyway, I agree for it not to be collusion the players have to agree collectively. They have done that and now I can sympathise that a market correction might be needed, however, with revenues going up collectively I think the owners need to share that load equally. so far they are not and thats why I cant support them
wow thats a lot of collectively's said the borg...