ODB wrote:Just wondering out loud here but I wonder if Gillis could have turned Luongo and Hodgson into Huberdeau and a little more?
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=146017#p146017
Moderator: Referees
ODB wrote:Just wondering out loud here but I wonder if Gillis could have turned Luongo and Hodgson into Huberdeau and a little more?
Topper wrote:ODB wrote:Just wondering out loud here but I wonder if Gillis could have turned Luongo and Hodgson into Huberdeau and a little more?
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=146017#p146017
ODB wrote:Topper wrote:ODB wrote:Just wondering out loud here but I wonder if Gillis could have turned Luongo and Hodgson into Huberdeau and a little more?
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=146017#p146017
Nice BUTT, in your post we need to get Doan and frankly I don't see that happening. I think Doan stays where he is.
CoHo, being a centre, might have been viewed as enough to give up Huberdeau. Maybe???
Not that it really matters now.
Lancer wrote:ODB wrote:
I guess management at the time wasn't certain they were going to go with Schneider vice Luongo moving into next season. The fact they started Luongo says as much about that as playing Schneider to end it says about who they wanted as a starter for next season. It would have taken Indiana-Jones-Boulder-Sized nuts to trade Luongo at that point.
Who knows? It might have broken the malaise around the team and sparked them into the home stretch and into the playoffs. Can't say what it would have done to the morale in the room or how they would have taken such a trade. I think Schneids had to provie himself to the team in the playoffs before management knew the team had the confidence in Schneider going into the playoffs.
Not knocking Kassian at this point (I know I have before), but Hodgson would be a good card to play now.
Diehard1 wrote: If both turn out then Kassian will likely be the more valuable guy. If neither turn out it's a moot point, and if only one turns out it's a calculated risk for both teams. Such is life with prospects.
Meds wrote:I think the Hodgson/Kassian debate, over which team got the best deal, ended when the firm of Gillis, Gilman & VIgneault, quit having to take Daddy Hodgson's phone calls.
If Kassian is the team guy he's rumored to be, and puts in the effort and brings sandpaper on any given night, then I don't really care if Hodgson goes on to become an 80-100 point guy and Kassian tops out at 60+. We've seen plenty of teams spin their wheels with a couple of top flight forwards with baggage. I'd rather not see the Canucks in that group.
donlever wrote:Plus one and Halle-fukin-lujah!!
CrzyCanuck wrote:Hodgson had a lot more to prove before you insert him as a no.2 center with 18 mins TOI and heavy duties.
A project for a project
A daddy's boy for a potential psychopath
RoyalDude wrote:I'm reading a lot of "what if's" regarding Kassian, like he is guaranteed to becoming our Lucic or Clowe.
tantalum wrote:Good chance that Hodgson's value would fairly low right now if he remained a canuck,
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests