2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need?
Moderator: Referees
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
I would do that trade.... Bailey has more offensive upside than Mathias...
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Anyone would do that trade... that's why it ain't happening.TDA Rum wrote:I would do that trade.... Bailey has more offensive upside than Mathias...
- Zamboni Driver
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
A 2-way guy would work, but last year they got Pahlsson who is another Manny-type center, and the 3rd line production dried up.Potatoe1 wrote:Zamboni Driver wrote: I was actually thinking more long-term, another 2nd line center would give the Canucks 3 good scoring lines, (assuming that Kassian improves as a solid 2nd/3rd winger)
Any second line caliber center is going to get buried behind Hank and Kesler both of whom are first line caliber guys who will likely continue to eat up at least 40 of the 60 min available minutes in that position.
I think Gillis is on the right track looking for a big, young, 2-way guy to play the 12 to 13 min available behing Kes and Hank.
Actually what I was not a bona fide 2nd line center (say like Kesler, 65 - 70 points) but a 2nd/3rd line center. I was thinking aguy that averages 45-55 points, say like Brooks Laich, olli Jokinen or Jarret Stoll.
Someone that could handle the 2nd line duties for a while, and provide some offensive punch on the 3rd line.
93602
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Potatoe1"
Any second line caliber center is going to get buried behind Hank and Kesler both of whom are first line caliber guys who will likely continue to eat up at least 40 of the 60 min available minutes in that position.
Kesler plays right wing, just like he did with Sundin .....and played well. The Canucks system has the first forward back become the default centre than it's one on one so it doesn't make much difference. Who takes the face off makes no difference ( like putting two centres out ) we need a play maker for the second line call him what you will. We have too many shooters and noy enough play makers. Imagine Daniel with out Henrik, that's what we have currently on the second line a bunch of players all wanting to shoot
cheers
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Yeah. I am up for dealing with Garth Snow and the Islanders one more time. It's like going into a pawn shop and trading a broken toaster.RoyalDude wrote:Ballard to the Islanders for their 3rd line centre Josh Bailey, he's young, decent size, cheap, good skill set, decent numbers, good ol' Canadian kid. What's not to like? The Islanders have centre prospect Strome waiting in the wings. Their 1 and 2 centres are Tavares and Nielsen. It's a good deal for both teams. The Isles are apparently interested in Ballard.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20436
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Josh Bailey should be on MG's radar. 22..... four years in the league, 30 point player and decent size.
There is fuck all out there for centres right now other than Gilbert Brule or Jason Arnott.
There is fuck all out there for centres right now other than Gilbert Brule or Jason Arnott.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Unless there is a NHL defenseman coming back, can the Canucks really afford to lose Ballard? If Ballard is traded, the third pairing will be Alberts and TanevRoyalDude wrote:Ballard to the Islanders for their 3rd line centre Josh Bailey, he's young, decent size, cheap, good skill set, decent numbers, good ol' Canadian kid. What's not to like? The Islanders have centre prospect Strome waiting in the wings. Their 1 and 2 centres are Tavares and Nielsen. It's a good deal for both teams. The Isles are apparently interested in Ballard.
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Which is why I'm not sold on pursuing Doan, I'm not completely adverse to the idea, but there are more pressing needs in the lineup than signing an expensive old guy.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Josh Bailey should be on MG's radar. 22..... four years in the league, 30 point player and decent size.
There is fuck all out there for centres right now other than Gilbert Brule or Jason Arnott.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Or Corrado-Tanev. Or Connauton-Tanev. Perhaps even Sauve-Tanev.Jovocop wrote:RoyalDude wrote: Unless there is a NHL defenseman coming back, can the Canucks really afford to lose Ballard? If Ballard is traded, the third pairing will be Alberts and Tanev
Alberts is #7 and we know it, but I think sooner or later Canucks need to introduce more youth on the D corps. Corrado and K-Con are really promising. Give them chance early on, if they struggle, make a move for a veteran in February, around trade deadline.
I don't really know if Canucks can afford to lose Ballard, but what started bothering me lately is when they will let the blueline kids get some experience. Has to happen sooner or later and we're not planning to tank in the near future, so might as well be sooner.
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Isn't Tanev still a rookie? Can the Canucks afford to have two rookie defensemen in the lineup at the same time? Corrado, Connauton, and Sauve should be the callups this season. They will definitely get some actions.mpp wrote:Or Corrado-Tanev. Or Connauton-Tanev. Perhaps even Sauve-Tanev.Jovocop wrote:RoyalDude wrote: Unless there is a NHL defenseman coming back, can the Canucks really afford to lose Ballard? If Ballard is traded, the third pairing will be Alberts and Tanev
Alberts is #7 and we know it, but I think sooner or later Canucks need to introduce more youth on the D corps. Corrado and K-Con are really promising. Give them chance early on, if they struggle, make a move in February, around trade deadline.
I don't really know if Canucks can afford to lose Ballard, but whatstarted bothering me lately is the nagging question as to when they want to let D youngsters get some experience. Has to happen sometime and we're not planning to tank in the near future.
- coco_canuck
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:54 pm
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Agree that an ideal C for the 3rd line is the team's biggest need, but the type of player they're looking for is likely a Bailey type that doesn't cost a whole lot of money.Topper wrote: Which is why I'm not sold on pursuing Doan, I'm not completely adverse to the idea, but there are more pressing needs in the lineup than signing an expensive old guy.
If a Luongo deal is done, and we add a young 3rd line C, we'll still have plenty of cap space to add a Doan type.
Obviously the ideal situation, but not a stretch.
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
Is 30 points with the minutes Josh Bailey gets really all that impressive?
I mean don't get me wrong, I'd take him for nothing and probably also take him for fairly little.. but Manny Malhotra produced 0.08 fewer points per 60 minutes at even strength than Bailey did with 1/3 the rate of offensive zone starts.
I mean don't get me wrong, I'd take him for nothing and probably also take him for fairly little.. but Manny Malhotra produced 0.08 fewer points per 60 minutes at even strength than Bailey did with 1/3 the rate of offensive zone starts.
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
I wouldn't consider him a rookie, even if he falls technically into that category. He's got 50+ games already, and is a pretty well known commodity. Having another "rookie" would make sense, and I'd like to see them get 20 or 30 games in as the other 7th defender. In my world, Alberts wouldn't play a game, cuz we wouldn't need him.Jovocop wrote: Isn't Tanev still a rookie? Can the Canucks afford to have two rookie defensemen in the lineup at the same time? Corrado, Connauton, and Sauve should be the callups this season. They will definitely get some actions.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 12931
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
I think the Canucks really need to add a winger to the top 6 who can actually play and fight. We have too many pussies and not enough dicks. I know some are going to go on about fighting and how its not relevant but what I'm advocating is someone who can play the game and stick up for guys when it really matters.
One look at Dustin Brown destroying our top centre tells me that this need will become more pronounced as the twins head down the slope in their careers. Imagine a hit like that knocking him out for the year like Sidney Crosby? I cant. Thats a season ender for a team that is so reliant on its top players.
So who is there?
Lucic...unavailable
Doan...available and still good.
Morrow...probably available for the right price
E.Kane...available but would be a team gutting trade
Feel free to add any names here but please consider they need to be able to play in the top 6, not just fill in when needed. My choice is Doan. he comes for only money and is still only 35. he looked pretty damn good in the playoffs IMHO.
One look at Dustin Brown destroying our top centre tells me that this need will become more pronounced as the twins head down the slope in their careers. Imagine a hit like that knocking him out for the year like Sidney Crosby? I cant. Thats a season ender for a team that is so reliant on its top players.
So who is there?
Lucic...unavailable
Doan...available and still good.
Morrow...probably available for the right price
E.Kane...available but would be a team gutting trade
Feel free to add any names here but please consider they need to be able to play in the top 6, not just fill in when needed. My choice is Doan. he comes for only money and is still only 35. he looked pretty damn good in the playoffs IMHO.
If you need air...call it in
- Zamboni Driver
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: 2012/13 season - what ONE player do we still really need
I gotta disagree that a fighting winger is the biggest need right now.Uncle dans leg wrote:I think the Canucks really need to add a winger to the top 6 who can actually play and fight. We have too many pussies and not enough dicks. I know some are going to go on about fighting and how its not relevant but what I'm advocating is someone who can play the game and stick up for guys when it really matters.
One look at Dustin Brown destroying our top centre tells me that this need will become more pronounced as the twins head down the slope in their careers. Imagine a hit like that knocking him out for the year like Sidney Crosby? I cant. Thats a season ender for a team that is so reliant on its top players.
So who is there?
Lucic...unavailable
Morrow...probably available for the right price
Feel free to add any names here but please consider they need to be able to play in the top 6, not just fill in when needed. My choice is Doan. he comes for only money and is still only 35. he looked pretty damn good in the playoffs IMHO.
Brown is 6'0" and about 205 pounds, Morrow is about the same.
We have Kassian who is both bigger & heavier. as well as Bitz & Volpatti.
Garrison should give the lineup more toughness.
If Kassian lives up to his potential as a big, mean winger it should help to fix tthat problem