wienerdog wrote:IMO, doing even three of the four following things:
- relying on Schroeder to make the jump
- expecting Ebbett to hold down a centre position on any line for months
- getting Lapierre to play 2C for an extended period
- expecting Malhota to play anything more than 4C
is really asking for some major trouble.
We still need a centreman. And we need him before season's beginning.
+1
Potatoe1 wrote:Zamboni Driver wrote:Seems to me that we are looking for a 2nd line center. Not a 1st, not a 3rd (AKA Pahlsson)
Given that Kesler is out until Nov or Dec, and will probably not be back in form until a month or two later, we're going to need a solid 2nd line center for most of the season. Having Kesler ease his way back with 3rd line duties and then having 3 bona fide pivots come playoff time would be nice.
I'm not terribly worried about the first few months of the season.
Second line centers are typically quite expensive to trade for or sign so picking one up just to fill in while Kesler gets healthy might not be the best use of assets.
I was actually thinking more long-term, another 2nd line center would give the Canucks 3 good scoring lines, (assuming that Kassian improves as a solid 2nd/3rd winger)
Seems to me that the Canucks would be better with scoring punch from the 3rd line, and leave the 4th line Manny/Lappierre in the checking role. Pahlsson & manny just couldn't provide much offence, letting other teams concentrate on shutting down the top 2 lines.