Flames still have no pivots!
Moderator: Referees
Aaronp18 wrote:Ollie signs in Winnipeg for 2 years, $9M total. $4.5m per.
Flames still have no pivots!

tantalum wrote:Hradek also saying to not be surprised is Parise signs back with the Devils. Inside info? No idea as he could just be parroting what we all know...Parise will choose NJ if they can come up with a reasonably competitive offer.
Potatoe1 wrote:tantalum wrote:Hradek also saying to not be surprised is Parise signs back with the Devils. Inside info? No idea as he could just be parroting what we all know...Parise will choose NJ if they can come up with a reasonably competitive offer.
That would be great.
Parise with the Hawks would be terrible. Sutter and Parise both with the wings would be terrible. Both with the wild would be concerning. Sutter with the wings would be a lateral.
Wings getting neither basically takes them out of it next year IMO.
the Dogsalmon wrote:Potatoe1 wrote:tantalum wrote:Hradek also saying to not be surprised is Parise signs back with the Devils. Inside info? No idea as he could just be parroting what we all know...Parise will choose NJ if they can come up with a reasonably competitive offer.
That would be great.
Parise with the Hawks would be terrible. Sutter and Parise both with the wings would be terrible. Both with the wild would be concerning. Sutter with the wings would be a lateral.
Wings getting neither basically takes them out of it next year IMO.
i think the loss of Lidstrom puts the Wings outta the picture as a serious contender...by the end of November we will see what an important part of their team he was...

the Dogsalmon wrote:i think the loss of Lidstrom puts the Wings outta the picture as a serious contender...by the end of November we will see what an important part of their team he was...
herb wrote:
Like many teams, Detroit has a ton of cap space and not much to spend it on. If they don't land Suter and/or Parise, they are not going to have much else to spend that space on barring a major trade or two. I like Suter, but even if they do land him, chances are slim that he'll be able to fully replace one of the best ever...
Potatoe1 wrote:That said there is a leadership / culture part to Lidstrom as well so we'll see how big of a factor that is.
Potatoe1 wrote:Yeah I'm not so sure.
Last year was a big drop off for him but it wasn't really discussed because of the Lidstrom mystique. I would Suspect that the 28 year old Suter is probably a better performer then the 40 year old Lidstrom.
That said there is a leadership / culture part to Lidstrom as well so we'll see how big of a factor that is.
donlever wrote:..it would be interesting to have a debate about top ten d-men, maybe top 5 but those 3 take up a lot of space.
Like who are 4 and 5 on the list.
There would be a ton of opinions for sure.
Larry Robinson would not get enough love.
Potvin is in the argument.
Sooo many....
donlever wrote:Larry Robinson would not get enough love.
Potvin is in the argument.
Sooo many....
donlever wrote:..it would be interesting to have a debate about top ten d-men, maybe top 5 but those 3 take up a lot of space.

Users browsing this forum: Raile and 4 guests