Meds wrote:First of all, the difference between Staal and Nash is a Stanley Cup ring and a whole lot more heart. So that's a bad comparisson. Staal has won with the 'Canes and there are some decent young pieces on that team whereas Columbus had some young players but none showed much hope of reaching their potential in the Jackets' system.
Secondly, Staal is an $8.2M cap hit for quite a few more years. If you take away his rookie season he boasts a career +/- of -27, and .97 points per game, the latter being quite respectable. However, when you consider that Crosby is only 3 years younger, boasts a career +80, and 1.4 points per game (and almost as many goals in nearly 200 fewer games), and has a cap hit of $8.7M, and then look at other players in the league who make less and produce more.....well I'm saying no to Staal based on his cap hit.
2 years ago Kesler put up only 4 fewer points than Staal but was a +24 compared to Staal's -10. This year Kesler played hurt, put up 20 fewer points than Staal, but was a +11 to Staal's -20.
Going forward I think that Kesler can be a 65-70 point scorer when healthy, while Staal is consistently going to be a 75-80 point guy. Kesler has proven that he can always be a plus player, whereas Staal has ended up on the minus side of the coin. I grant that Staal would likely have better numbers in that regard playing on a team like the Canucks compared to where he is now in Carolina. However, it still comes down to cap hit. Kesler is $5M. Staal is $8.2M. Are 10-15 points really worth $3.2M in cap space? That figure can land you a very winger that could play alot of 2nd and 3rd line minutes. And dollars to pucks will probably eclipse that 10-15 point margin quite handily.
I know you just like tossing these up here for shits and giggles Farhan, but you always seem to forget about the dollar signs attached to these guys in contrast to their actual production.
Good points about the cap hit. The Staal idea was just completely off the top of my head.
Having said that - I think the CONCEPT of my idea is a good one...........and one that will serve the Canucks well moving into the future. Here are a few things that I believe to be truths:
1) While we will get a decent return on the inevitable Luongo deal, it's not going to be as much as people think.
2) Trading only one of Luongo or Schneider will not address our lack of depth
3) Kesler is a tremendous player but I believe that the presence of guys like Pahlsson, Lapierre, and even Malhottra if he sticks around will prevent the Canucks from ever using Kesler in the correct way moving forward (especially if these past playoffs were of any indication). Kesler can score goals, but he needs the type of guy going up against opposing top lines in a shut down role while scoring on turnovers/chances.........as opposed to being used in a role where he's thinking offense first. Kesler is not a natural offensive center, and him being used on that 2nd line will prevent guys like Booth and Higgins from being fully maximized.
4) The Canucks need a top tier center that can successfully take over the #1 center position in a few years when the Sedins' decline. Kesler isn't that guy, and neither was Cody Hodgson.
5) Canucks need a significant top 6 forward that can take pressure off of the twins, and a blue chip defenseman. Trading only one of Luongo and Schneider will not get this done.
Hence - with all this in mind, I believe that the Canucks would be best served by trading (Schneider/Luongo + Kesler) for an upgrade at the 2nd line position (while accepting a slight downgrade in the goaltending position), while trading either Schneider/Luongo to Tampa Bay with the expectation that Victor Hedman will come back our way.
RIP Creeper. You will be missed.