LOLFarhan Lalji wrote:Pretty much.rats19 wrote:So basically jealousy...cuz everything listed there is mongoloid lame.
I mean - I can kind of "see" points 1,2, and 3, but 4,5, and 6 is absolutely ridiculous.
It's just too bad that Calgary's two best players in franchise history is...
Mod edit
From Bountiful to Ponoka
Moderator: Referees
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
The flames are fucked - no other way to put it. Personally, I would say they are at least 5 years or more from being comptetitive. I the meanwhile - how about those Coyotes - LOL.
Whale Oil Beef Hooked
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it" - Yogi Berra
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it" - Yogi Berra
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Well, from my point of view, I don't think that Graham James should be mentioned in these threads. The guy is a criminal - plain and simple. As for the Mockeying comment on Iggy- come on - you guys are better than that. This is what I'd expect at CP - if it were another player.Topper wrote:LOLFarhan Lalji wrote:Pretty much.rats19 wrote:So basically jealousy...cuz everything listed there is mongoloid lame.
I mean - I can kind of "see" points 1,2, and 3, but 4,5, and 6 is absolutely ridiculous.
It's just too bad that Calgary's two best players in franchise history is...
Mod edit
Whale Oil Beef Hooked
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it" - Yogi Berra
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it" - Yogi Berra
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Topper wrote:LOLFarhan Lalji wrote:Pretty much.rats19 wrote:So basically jealousy...cuz everything listed there is mongoloid lame.
I mean - I can kind of "see" points 1,2, and 3, but 4,5, and 6 is absolutely ridiculous.
It's just too bad that Calgary's two best players in franchise history is...
Mod edit
You are a disgusting individual for those comments. You better apologize.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Hey expat & okcanuck, I apologize for that post above, the guys that run this board are class people and do not tolerate racist or sexist stuff, nor pedophile glorification. Unfortunately some people, and there is only a couple, on here have no such class and are pretty cowardly in their behaviour on a message board.
That said, Flames still suck Big Rocks!
That said, Flames still suck Big Rocks!
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Arachnid wrote:Hey expat & okcanuck, I apologize for that post above, the guys that run this board are class people and do not tolerate racist or sexist stuff, nor pedophile glorification. Unfortunately some people, and there is only a couple, on here have no such class and are pretty cowardly in their behaviour on a message board.
That said, Flames still suck Big Rocks!
You're absolutely right. This message board has to try and be above garbage posts like that one . His post was disgusting and he owes an apology to this board and to Calpuck. I go over to the dark side(calpuke) once in a while and I don`t recall ever reading anything as bad as that.
You`re also right about the Flames they suck.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Hey okcanuck,okcanuck wrote:
You're absolutely right. This message board has to try and be above garbage posts like that one . His post was disgusting and he owes an apology to this board and to Calpuck. I go over to the dark side(calpuke) once in a while and I don`t recall ever reading anything as bad as that.
You`re also right about the Flames they suck.
You are correct that I do owe an apology. Cornuck spoke to me about my comments as well, and I do think an apology is in order. Honestly - a lot of us older posters from the old CC have a bit of dark humor (as evidenced by the fact that both Topper and Strangelove were amused by my comments, combined with the fact that Blob McKenzie used the word "chink" in one of the game day threads, combined with rats19's use of the term, "retarded cousin fucker"), and so I was catering to that crowd with my comments.
However - this IS a different board and different audiences read our posts and so I should have taken that into account. My comments were purely meant for shits and giggles, and I have nothing but the utmost respect for minority hockey players. Being a minority myself, I, perhaps more than anyone, should be more careful and considerate with these types of comments.....even if they are meant to be in jest amongst my fellow "thick skinned" old school posters.
I sincerely apologize to Cornuck, OkCanuck, Canuckscorner, and anyone else that may have been offended by my comments.
Cheers, and go Canucks go!
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
I'll take that apology, beacuse I'm consistently offended by your trade proposals on this board.Farhan Lalji wrote:I sincerely apologize to Cornuck, OkCanuck, Canuckscorner, and anyone else that may have been offended by my comments.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
lol I like how FL was trying to bring down everyone else as well.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Apology accepted Farhan
I really think this message board is by far the best one in hockey and our standards have to be kept up.
I'm a relative newbie here and I really enjoy reading these threads. Don't get me wrong. I enjoy humor as much as the next guy and I wouldn't want to read anything sanitized to the point of being boring,but racism is another kettle of fish.
I really think this message board is by far the best one in hockey and our standards have to be kept up.
I'm a relative newbie here and I really enjoy reading these threads. Don't get me wrong. I enjoy humor as much as the next guy and I wouldn't want to read anything sanitized to the point of being boring,but racism is another kettle of fish.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Why do you offend fish?okcanuck wrote:Apology accepted Farhan
I really think this message board is by far the best one in hockey and our standards have to be kept up.
I'm a relative newbie here and I really enjoy reading these threads. Don't get me wrong. I enjoy humor as much as the next guy and I wouldn't want to read anything sanitized to the point of being boring,but racism is another kettle of fish.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Hey SKYO,SKYO wrote:lol I like how FL was trying to bring down everyone else as well.
I wasn't deliberately attempting to take anyone down with me, lol............as me and the aforementioned posters go way back. However - I was just stating facts. Based on those comments made previously, I wasn't 100% sure as to what constituted as "dark humor" and what constituted as "offensive" on here. Obviously, my comments were over the line and so I will not make that error in judgement again.
Last edited by Farhan Lalji on Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
Point taken okcanuck,okcanuck wrote:Apology accepted Farhan
I really think this message board is by far the best one in hockey and our standards have to be kept up.
I'm a relative newbie here and I really enjoy reading these threads. Don't get me wrong. I enjoy humor as much as the next guy and I wouldn't want to read anything sanitized to the point of being boring,but racism is another kettle of fish.
Like I said - some of us older posters go way back with our roughneck-level jokes, but it's always with the mutual understanding that none of us are actually racists, homophobes, etc. Just guys "shooting the proverbial shit.". You are definitely correct that this board is excellent, and I will try and do my part to contribute to the quality.
Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka
For whatever it's worth, I was contemplating the idea of the Canucks trading Roberto Luongo for Dan Boyle last night at the end of the season.wienerdog wrote:I'll take that apology, beacuse I'm consistently offended by your trade proposals on this board.Farhan Lalji wrote:I sincerely apologize to Cornuck, OkCanuck, Canuckscorner, and anyone else that may have been offended by my comments.
Sharks get their much needed upgrade in net and the Canucks get a top tier top four defensemen that should still be decent for the next 3 years (he's getting up there in age, but dmen can often play well until 37-38).