Moderator: Referees
Rayxor wrote:Jovocop wrote:...but I am not sure AV would sit Raymond for more than a game, especially in the playoffs.
That might be a good plan to utilize our depth. Raymond is the kind of guy that will get worn down in long grinding series so to platoon him might mean you will be getting the most out him. He would be healthy, rested and motivated when he gets into a game. Kinda like basketball's 6th man, or maybe more like Tim Tebow.
Hockey Widow wrote: I like how Ebbett has learned the art of deflection and I think planting him in front of the net or having Bitz on he forecheck would make Kesler and Booth more dangerous. So if Raymond can't get it together then he should sit.
Larry Goodenough wrote:Bouwmeester was on the ice for 11 scoring chances against , zero for. My calculator says that's a minus 11.
Perhaps the worst game of anyone in any Vancouver game this season.
donlever wrote:Larry Goodenough wrote:Bouwmeester was on the ice for 11 scoring chances against , zero for. My calculator says that's a minus 11.
Perhaps the worst game of anyone in any Vancouver game this season.
While I would not dispute the inadequacies of Bouwmeester, especially in relation to his salary, those stats must be pretty subjective.
He almost beat Luongo himself from the right circle with a shot Roberto struggled to secure.
Topper wrote:I gotta say I'm loving this Ebbett/Raymond nonsense. And lets be clear, nonsense is exactly what it is.
As someone who recognized the potential in Raymond back when others were calling for him to be traded for a second round pick. I see Raymond has hit a plateau. Could be conditioning, could be physical or mental hangovers from his injury or a combination of all of the above. That said, he and Booth are still the two best puck handlers at speed on the team and probably the only two who can consistently carry the puck through the neutral zone and deep into the offensive zone.
Where Raymond falls down, is when he attempts a power move to the net, he simply isn't strong enough on his feet or on his stick, and his pass selection when he does pass off, he forces too many passes through traffic that end up as turnovers.
Mason still plays a valuable role on the team. He is a very good PK'er and his speed does back defenders off, but as I said, he has hit a plateau and plateauing in a contract year is never good. I still believe Mason fills an important role, is he replaceable though, damn right he is. If Paulson was brought in to replace wonderbread, who was Zach brought in to replace? THINK ABOUT IT.
Ebbett is a fine 3-4 line role player, can play wing or centre, small guy who give everything he can and knows anything less gets him a career in the East Coast League. The role he plays is exactly what a base level wonderbread should have been capable of but wasn't.
Topper wrote:Where Raymond falls down, is when he attempts a power move to the net, he simply isn't strong enough on his feet or on his stick, and his pass selection when he does pass off, he forces too many passes through traffic that end up as turnovers.

Topper wrote:Mason still plays a valuable role on the team. He is a very good PK'er and his speed does back defenders off, but as I said, he has hit a plateau and plateauing in a contract year is never good. I still believe Mason fills an important role, is he replaceable though, damn right he is. If Paulson was brought in to replace wonderbread, who was Zach brought in to replace? THINK ABOUT IT.
Listercat wrote:Raymond has become the favourite whipping boy.

Topper wrote:Where Raymond falls down, is when he attempts a power move to the net
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest