Moderator: Referees
Farhan Lalji wrote:He's referring to our performance against Boston (8 goals in 7 games).
RoyalDude wrote:dbr wrote:
Of course Pahlsson is as limited as Hodgson, it's just that he is limited to being the type of player that offers exactly what the organization wanted from its third line center.
I think exactly what we need right now dan bob rick is offense, not defense, and besides, with the way we've been getting outshot lately, I believe it's goaltending that is saving us and not defense. Unfortunately for Lou and Ginger, we have no offense to cushion a lead that makes their job a little bit easier.
Jovocop wrote:RoyalDude wrote: Curious to know if some of that 'evaluation' you seem to be a fly on the wall on involved the fact that we could only score 8 goals in 7 games?
First of all, 8 goals in 7 games is wrong. It should 8 goals in 6 games or 12 goals in 7 games.
Last 7 games
FINAL CBJ (3) - VAN (4)
FINAL VAN (0) - MIN (2)
FINAL VAN (1) - CHI (2) OT
FINAL VAN (2) - DAL (1)
FINAL VAN (3) - COL (2) OT
FINAL LAK (0) - VAN (1)
FINAL COL (0) - VAN (1)
Canucks was 12 GF and 10 GF in the last 7 games or 8 GF and 7 GA in the last 6 games. If you want to magnify the problem, the Canucks only score 2 goals in the last two games... but gave up nothing...
If you take out the first two games against Columbus and Minnesota (non-playoffs teams), the Canucks have a 4-1 record against playoffs (or trying to make the playoffs) teams.
Arachnid wrote:
Let me get this straight.... if we win all our playoff games 1-0 or by 1 goal you are still gonna bitch about 'it?!
![]()
:
Farhan Lalji wrote:Of course RD would be happy if we won all of our playoff games 1-0. He also knows however that it's not realistic, and that the more our offense struggles.......the greater the strain and pressure that it puts on our goalies. The series against Boston was a perfect example of this unfortunately.
Jovocop wrote:
FINAL CBJ (3) - VAN (4)
FINAL VAN (0) - MIN (2)
FINAL VAN (1) - CHI (2) OT
FINAL VAN (2) - DAL (1)
FINAL VAN (3) - COL (2) OT
FINAL LAK (0) - VAN (1)
FINAL COL (0) - VAN (1)
Island Nucklehead wrote:Farhan Lalji wrote:Of course RD would be happy if we won all of our playoff games 1-0. He also knows however that it's not realistic, and that the more our offense struggles.......the greater the strain and pressure that it puts on our goalies. The series against Boston was a perfect example of this unfortunately.
Coulda shoulda woulda. The point Spidey is trying to make is that WE'RE WINNING.
I'll worry about scoring enough goals when we aren't scoring enough goals.
Farhan Lalji wrote:Good post Pot.
For me personally, Im just a bit concerned over having the same scoring woes as last year in the post-season.
Potatoe1 wrote:Farhan Lalji wrote:Good post Pot.
For me personally, Im just a bit concerned over having the same scoring woes as last year in the post-season.
The team doesn't give a fuck, their regular season was over a month ago....
Do you think that team "we don't give a fuck" is going to score a pile of goals against team "omg if we lose we are fucked" ?
During the season when we had something to play for we were easily a top3 offensive club, just like we have been for several years. And our offence was fine in the playoffs last year until half our players got hurt.
Stop stressing and go have a beer....
If you truly need to worry, then worry about is injuries, not if a healthy and motivated Canuck team can score more then 1 goal a game.
Potatoe wrote:
Stop stressing and go have a beer....
.
clem wrote:Or you could drink some kool aid.
clem wrote:Or you could drink some kool aid.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot] and 3 guests