RoyalDude wrote: it may go like this - IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!
If it can be better, make it so.
Moderator: Referees
RoyalDude wrote: it may go like this - IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!
dhabums wrote:RoyalDude wrote: it may go like this - IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!
If it can be better, make it so.
dhabums wrote:RoyalDude wrote: it may go like this - IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!
If it can be better, make it so.
RoyalDude wrote:dhabums wrote:RoyalDude wrote: it may go like this - IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT!
If it can be better, make it so.
Shuddup dhapoopusher, this is not your fight. You remind me of one of those bantam league angry hollering hockey dads living vicariously through their sons eyes at hockey rinks strewn across this vast country of ours.
RoyalDude wrote:Potatoe1 wrote:
Ryan, Sibsia, Ellis for Ballard, Hodgson, Schneider
Yuck, The Ducks win this by a country mile. Hodgson is just warming up and Schneider is a Franchise Elite Goaltender in the making. Don't think cement shoes Ryan fits the Canuck system here. Plus, you have to ask yourself, "Why is Anaheim wanting to get rid of him if he is soooooo good?
Potatoe1 wrote:RoyalDude wrote:Potatoe1 wrote:
Ryan, Sibsia, Ellis for Ballard, Hodgson, Schneider
Yuck, The Ducks win this by a country mile. Hodgson is just warming up and Schneider is a Franchise Elite Goaltender in the making. Don't think cement shoes Ryan fits the Canuck system here. Plus, you have to ask yourself, "Why is Anaheim wanting to get rid of him if he is soooooo good?
Sibsa is a quality young defenseman on a great contract, and Ryan is 24 and has been over 30 goals every season in the league. He scored 35 goals as a 22 year old, there are only a handful of guys in the league who have done that. As to why they are trading him, I already said why, they are dumb. What kind of idiot GM trades a 24 year old who is already an established and consistent 35 goal scorer. Now the talk is they might move Getzlaf, again, what idiot would trade a player like that?
Hodgson is a good young player but he isn't even close to Ryan in terms of value and Schneider is going to force our hands at some point.
The line up I posted, is bigger, tougher, more balanced, and more skilled then what we currently have.
A second line of Kesler, Ryan and Booth, is better then all but a handful of first lines, and I like Sibsa better then Ballard on the 3rd pairing.
Anyway the proposal was mostly just for fun, it has pretty much zero chance of happening anyway.
dhabums wrote:There's a fight?
Hockey Widow wrote:............... The team needs a major rebuild but you do it with a new GM and coaching staff. Calgary made the mistake of holding onto Sutter too long and it will cost them for a few years yet. If they had dumped Sutter two years earlier and started t re-tool they would not be in this mess. Anaheim will make the same mistake if they allow current management to do the re-tooling or rebuilding.
The Flyers did it when they let Clark go before he could ruin the team. Heck the Canucks did it in letting the last bastion of the Burke era go in Nonis and brought in MG. The Ducks need a complete new direction and the only way they get that is by changing the management of letting the new GM assess what he has and move on from there.
dangler wrote:good points HW,the Ducks definately need a rebuild and too many teams try to tweak a few things(new coach a couple of trades) and continue to struggle,whats going on in Montreal and the Nonis era both come to mind.
When ownership see's a rebuild coming they should go and find a new GM FIRST.
dangler wrote:5 players do not make a team.
Potatoe1 wrote:dangler wrote:5 players do not make a team.
Youre right the Oilers should move RHN, Eberle, Whitney, and Hall. They suck and should start over.

Hockey Widow wrote:The Flyers did it when they let Clark go before he could ruin the team.

Strangelove wrote:Hockey Widow wrote:The Flyers did it when they let Clark go before he could ruin the team.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests