Potatoe1 wrote:Meds wrote:
As for playing favorites I totally agree. Manny playing on the 3rd line over Lappy was a total joke.
Or Rome and Burrows on the point over Ballard...
Moderator: Referees
Potatoe1 wrote:Meds wrote:
As for playing favorites I totally agree. Manny playing on the 3rd line over Lappy was a total joke.
Meds wrote:Uncle dans leg wrote:I dont think MayRay is as bad as you're making him out to be here. Maybe he's no power forward but he was definitely a key part of last years presidents trophy winner as well as runner up to the Stanley Cup.
By "key part", do you mean with his 39 regular season points and his 8 playoff points?
And I would never say that Raymond has a "wicked shot". His slapshot is fairly hard, but not spectacularly so, and always bullseyeing the goalie's logo. His wrist shot is, well we've never really seen it.....
I agree with Pot about him fitting in the top 9, and also that it is a plus and not a minus. I'm fine with that, so long as AV makes him earn his minutes, if he's outplaying Booth or Higgins, slot him in, if he's not, sit him. That goes for any player, Vigneault's love affair with players like Malhotra, Rome, and Luongo, is the thing that aggravates me the most, and I suppose it is fair to say that I take it out on the player who is slumping rather than the coach who is more concerned about his boy than about the win.
Uncle dans leg wrote:Meds wrote:Uncle dans leg wrote:I dont think MayRay is as bad as you're making him out to be here. Maybe he's no power forward but he was definitely a key part of last years presidents trophy winner as well as runner up to the Stanley Cup.
By "key part", do you mean with his 39 regular season points and his 8 playoff points?
And I would never say that Raymond has a "wicked shot". His slapshot is fairly hard, but not spectacularly so, and always bullseyeing the goalie's logo. His wrist shot is, well we've never really seen it.....
I agree with Pot about him fitting in the top 9, and also that it is a plus and not a minus. I'm fine with that, so long as AV makes him earn his minutes, if he's outplaying Booth or Higgins, slot him in, if he's not, sit him. That goes for any player, Vigneault's love affair with players like Malhotra, Rome, and Luongo, is the thing that aggravates me the most, and I suppose it is fair to say that I take it out on the player who is slumping rather than the coach who is more concerned about his boy than about the win.
He had 18 points in his first 25 games then broke his thumb. He obviously struggled to regain his form after that but he was on pace before the injury to match his totals of his "breakout" year when he potted 25 goals. I do think he has a good shot when healthy. You don't pop 25 by hitting only crests in the NHL. He was injured and struggled upon his return I agree but to write him off based on last years' point production alone is a bit premature. His speed causes quite a few turnovers down low and our 41 goal scoring Selke trophy winner was the benefactor on many of these digs. I would bet Kesler is quietly eager for his return.
Meds wrote: Could you fire me a link that shows his 18 points in the first 25 games last year? I don't recall that at all, and I was watching him last year because I anticipated a good season from him to follow up his breakout.....
Per wrote:Meds wrote: Could you fire me a link that shows his 18 points in the first 25 games last year? I don't recall that at all, and I was watching him last year because I anticipated a good season from him to follow up his breakout.....
Substituting for the limb here; there's a nice little site on the interwebs called nhl.com that can show you this stuff.
There's really no rocket science to it. I'll give you a direct link to Raymond's game log so you just have to click it.
Here: http://www.nhl.com/ice/player.htm?id=84 ... 1&view=log
OK, scroll down to the bottom, then count 25 games up (that'd be Dec 8), then add all the points from the bottom up till that date, and voilá - it's 18!![]()
Don't know why he chose the 18 in 25 mention, since Raymond had a point in all three games right after that, which brought him to 21 in 28, which is an even better PPG average, but whatever.
Uncle dans leg wrote:He was injured Dec 11 then missed 10 games. Not sure if the next 3 were upon his return maybe... He also partially seperated his shoulder in march which wouldve contributed to his points woes but thanks for the look up Per...tack!
Meds wrote:You need to watch some game tape. Of his 25 goals there were at least 15 that were garbage, or flukes that bounced off of him and fluttered over the goalie, and one that was a lob from the scrum at center ice that dropped behind Kiprusoff (oh that was beautiful to see, even more beautiful to watch Bountiful erupt).....
dhabums wrote:Did anyone catch Moulson's comment that Grabner could be a 70 GOAL scorer? I assume he meant in a season. That must have sent the MAgic40 club into a tizzy.
Rayxor wrote:Meds wrote:You need to watch some game tape. Of his 25 goals there were at least 15 that were garbage, or flukes that bounced off of him and fluttered over the goalie, and one that was a lob from the scrum at center ice that dropped behind Kiprusoff (oh that was beautiful to see, even more beautiful to watch Bountiful erupt).....
regardless of his numbers, his play last year was a step back from the previous year. My opinion, and I suspect that of many others here, is that if his play is a continuation of last year, there may be better options for the 2nd line and Raymond shouldn't be a lock in the top six unless he plays more like the Raymond of 2 years ago.
It's not like he couldn't thrive in a third line role on this team. a line of him, Silent G and Hansen (for example) would get its share of scoring opportunities. In fact, a smart playmaker like Hodgson might be better suited for Raymond who often had difficulty creating offensive opportunities when he carried the puck in himself.
Uncle dans leg wrote:Pairing him with CoHo would definitely be interesting. Who isn't excited with how well Cody has been playing the past 10 games? I'm impressed and suprised quite honestly.
dhabums wrote:Did anyone catch Moulson's comment that Grabner could be a 70 GOAL scorer? I assume he meant in a season.
KeyserSoze wrote:dhabums wrote:Anyone else want in?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest