Some good posts by Keyser and dhabums.
I'm not against trading anyone on the roster as long as what we get in return makes the team better.
KeyserSoze wrote:The Canucks managing to score just 8 goals in 7 games is not even close to good enough.
See, if the Canucks offense wasn't that futile last year, if the Canucks were healthy and deep enough in 09-10 against Chicago, if the Canucks had the depth and speed to keep up with the Hawks in 08-09, then yes, I'd be there booing Luongo for being the sole reason this team has looked bad when getting eliminated.
Does that mean he shouldn't be held accountable?
I don't think anyone is saying that, but his struggles have been no more pronounced than any other key Canucks skater.
If Luongo was as bad as some are saying, he wouldn't have more wins (regular season and playoffs combined) since the lockout. If Luongo was such a sieve, he wouldn't have two vezina nominations over the past 6 years, he wouldn't be a perennial all-star and he wouldn't rank in the top 5 of virtually every goalie stat over the past 6 years.
Whether you personally dislike Luongo or think Schneider is better or if you want him gone, it's ludicrous to suggest this guy isn't an elite goalie that can be the best in the world on any given night.
I implore those who think Luongo struggles more than any other elite goalie in the playoffs to look at the Miller and Lundqvist have done in the post-season the past 6 years. Look at how many first round exits those guys have, look at how Miller was pulled in game 7 against Philly last year, and other big games where he has been ventilated and pulled, look at how Lundqvist has had hellish numbers in a series the way Luongo has had as well as some of his struggles in elimination games.
The Luongo everyone seems to rank below Lundqist and Miller has more playoff wins and playoff series wins than those two goalies. Did you know Lundqvist has never been past the second round?
I'm not saying Luongo is significantly better than those two, nor am I diminishing the ability of Lundqvist and Miller, but the simple truth is, Luongo has been a more consistent and better statistical goalie than those two in the regular season and he has accomplished more than those guys in the playoffs.
You can certainly make an argument that those two guys are better than Luongo, I may not agree, but it's certainly a valid suggestion. But even if they are better, they're only marginally so, the same way Luongo may only be marginally better.
But don't let truth and facts get in the way of this witch trial.