Bertuzzi/Moore

[dhabums]

I remember reading... long time ago... that Moore & Co were claiming Bert was putting assets into his wife's name.
Todd Bertuzzi is a weasel.....

I think it was property in ON somewhere. I'm sure it could be googled.

[Brian CC]

Coco_Canuck, welcome to the site, and let me clarify something.

This site IS different than Canucks Central, always has been. When Central folded and their users descended here they were told that Central's open policy, which in the end was the architect of it's demise, won't be acceptable here. There are some big shots being taken at posters, and I'm not going to tolerate it.

I guess what I am saying is this is CanucksCorner and you came to our house. It's up to all of you if you want to be part of what we've created here. We didn't have these issues before Central closed.

I want everyone to get along. I makes my life a whole lot easier and makes the board better for everyone. If not I have no problem punting the people that don't want to respect my visions for this site. I pay the bills, it's my house....not toomuch to ask I don't think.

[Arachnid]

Looks like Moore money for the team formally known as The Orcas

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/h ... le2312475/

[Fred]

I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision

[dhabums]

I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision

Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.

The court uses the evidence provided.

Personal injury claims often take years.

Because it was filed in Ontario.

[Arachnid]

Why does this story always rear it's ugly head when there is hockey in the air (Playoffs, draft, free-agency, start of season).

http://www.thestar.com/sports/hockey/nh ... -struggles

I don't believe it for a minute.

Something stinks to high heaven here.

I think he is milking this as a way to a cool 60 million as opposed to working hard to overcome all the odds and have a career

Steve Moore you are a coward and a pansy and your name will forever be etched in shame if you continue this route...get a real job and suck it the fuck up...

[Topper]

A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.

[Uncle dans leg]

A spineless jellyfish who could never have suffered broken vertebrae.

as in broke invertebrate?

[Blob Mckenzie]

I'm intrigued by this case. Obviously it has no effect on my life so who takes the brunt of the award is incidental but when it's all over I hope we get a full explanation why the judge makes the award or maybe does not...

For the life of me I can't understand how a court can define how the injury occurred...was it the punch or was it the piling on after the fall ?

I wonder why the case is being heard in Ontario ?

I have to think that either the length of time to bring it to trial is indicative of the difficulty to prove the claimants point of view or the amount asked for is so large it has become a case celeb and must be heard at such a high level ie Supreme Court ?

I'm not into who's right and who wrong as much as how the court will reach a decision

Reasons for judgment, not that it will likely get that far.

The court uses the evidence provided.

Personal injury claims often take years.

Because it was filed in Ontario.

Look what the cat dragged in.