Bertuzzi/Moore
Moderator: Referees
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
No personal attacks in the "Bar & Grill" either. It's a simple rule, and sometimes things will get out of hand, but it's just a good idea to think twice about throwing out insults. Like most people, I come here for hockey talk and some off topic banter - insults and name calling add nothing to the site (and I hate having to edit posts).
So.... about the Bertuzzi / Moore incident and eventual trial...
So.... about the Bertuzzi / Moore incident and eventual trial...
Doc: "BTW, Donny was right, you're smug."
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Now THAT is one we're adjusting to.Cornuck wrote: No personal attacks in the "Bar & Grill" either.
Remarkably well considering!
Mind you a lot of it was nothing more than good-natured ribbing.
Yeah, hard to tell the difference sometimes when one doesn't know the history....
But hey, it's all good!
HOME SWEET HOME!!!
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20433
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Kinda like Chazz Bono......he also has a new handle.Strangelove wrote: my buddy Fred (under another handle)
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Eddy Punch Clock wrote:I think ending the award with the $44 is just adding insult to injury.Tciso wrote:The guy was 26, making league minimum, or close to it ($425k), and had 12 points in 68 games. Given the lockout, he would have been lucky to sign another contract at any level. I don't know what he received so far, but I can't see how anything more than $1mil can be justified, as that would likely be way more then he would ever earn playing another 3 or 4 years in Europe or other 2nd tier hockey league. Ad in 50 bucks for pain ans suffering, and take away 6 bucks for being an ass leaves it at a cool $1,000,044 total.
This one got lost in the derailment....
- coco_canuck
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:54 pm
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
No one said anything about accepting personal attacks, and I wasn't criticizing this board's rule, but whatever, I've said my piece whether it's ignored or not.Jovorock wrote: How other boards operate, is their business , if personal attacks are allowed on the other CC board then that's fine. But personal attack are not allowed on this board. I don't make the rules, I follow them.
Carry on debating a dead player..errr..horse topic.
- LotusBlossom
- MVP
- Posts: 2460
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:53 pm
- Location: Metro Vancouver
- Contact:
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Ha!ukcanuck wrote:Eddy Punch Clock wrote:I think ending the award with the $44 is just adding insult to injury.Tciso wrote:The guy was 26, making league minimum, or close to it ($425k), and had 12 points in 68 games. Given the lockout, he would have been lucky to sign another contract at any level. I don't know what he received so far, but I can't see how anything more than $1mil can be justified, as that would likely be way more then he would ever earn playing another 3 or 4 years in Europe or other 2nd tier hockey league. Ad in 50 bucks for pain ans suffering, and take away 6 bucks for being an ass leaves it at a cool $1,000,044 total.
This one got lost in the derailment....
Do any of you lawyers on the board know what type of guidelines are in place to how much a person could be rewarded in civil court here in Canada and specifically Ontario? Are there certain limitations? I'm just curious.
parfois, je veux juste laisser tinber un coude volant sur le monde
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
I'm interesting in knowing if a person in civil court can be found partially guilty ie 40% blame or do they have to be found guilty and then the degree of guilt apportioned after that ?
cheers
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Yes, both Bert and Orca Bay could be found partially responsible.Fred wrote:I'm interesting in knowing if a person in civil court can be found partially guilty ie 40% blame or do they have to be found guilty and then the degree of guilt apportioned after that ?
So Bert & Moore will be in full agreement that Orca Bay is at least partially responsible!
I think Moore is asking for ~$20mil?
Prolly he ends up with... wot... merely a few mil ??
Unless of course the defense can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr Moore is a complete & utter weasel!
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
I'm no lawyer but I do know a family member of the Moores. But civil suits for negligence have been settled up to 14 million in some cases but most of those are for high quad injuries. Moore has to prove he was going to earn a lot of $$$ to get anything significant.LotusBlossom wrote:ukcanuck wrote:Eddy Punch Clock wrote:The guy was 26, making league minimum, or close to it ($425k), and had 12 points in 68 games. Given the lockout, he would have been lucky to sign another contract at any level. I don't know what he received so far, but I can't see how anything more than $1mil can be justified, as that would likely be way more then he would ever earn playing another 3 or 4 years in Europe or other 2nd tier hockey league. Ad in 50 bucks for pain ans suffering, and take away 6 bucks for being an ass leaves it at a cool $1,000,044 total.
Ha!
Do any of you lawyers on the board know what type of guidelines are in place to how much a person could be rewarded in civil court here in Canada and specifically Ontario? Are there certain limitations? I'm just curious.
He was a privileged boy 'ol Stevie, pool, tennis courts in his GTA home all his life. The greater family all loved going to the Moore's house because they had EVERYTHING for all the cousins to play with. "they never wanted for anything"
Brick Top: Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible cunt... me.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Pete, I don't suppose perchance this "family member" would be willing to testify Mr Moore is a complete & utter weasel??
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Battery: Bert has already been convicted of battery in criminal court.Mondi wrote:I haven't looked into this, but does anyone know whether Mr. Moore is seeking a claim in negligence or battery? Or both.
These torts have extremely different components.
But I'm sure he'll be claiming at some point that Orca Bay is guilty of negligence, right?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Dan Hinote played 3 more years, is older and put up similar numbers and got $1M a year in the CAP era. I am not comparing the two players really, but seeing as they were on the same team, played the same number of games and had the same number of points I found it slightly amusing.Tciso wrote:The guy was 26, making league minimum, or close to it ($425k), and had 12 points in 68 games. Given the lockout, he would have been lucky to sign another contract at any level. I don't know what he received so far, but I can't see how anything more than $1mil can be justified, as that would likely be way more then he would ever earn playing another 3 or 4 years in Europe or other 2nd tier hockey league. Ad in 50 bucks for pain ans suffering, and take away 6 bucks for being an ass leaves it at a cool $1,000,044 total.ukcanuck wrote:I am only guessing myself but since Moore's lawsuit includes the Canucks, Brian Burke, Marc Crawford and Bertuzzi, I'm thinking that Moore has to prove there was more than a wild punch that had catastrophic consequences, he has to show that it was premeditated and each of the defendants contributed to an attack that left him in a reduced capacity. I don't think that it matters what exact moment did the damage, the punch or the dog pile immediately after would just be the gun, its who pulled the trigger that is what Moore needs to show so that he can get damages from them.
At the end of the day, if I am the judge I would hold my nose, take into account what a comparable player would make in an average year and factor out an average career (5 yrs) and tag each defendant with the bill.
Then of course there is the rest of his life. Hmmm, a Harvard grad, parents are both lawyers, maybe he gets a job at McDonalds in Scarborough? Or maybe law school. Maybe he makes $500-700K a year for 20 more years. This of course depends on just how bad his PCS. And a whole bunch of other things.
I know lots of people want (errrr, NEED) to paint Moore as a guy looking for the easy way out. I can't say I get where that idea comes from. The guy works hard enough to get into Harvard and graduate while playing hockey. He then works his way from the AHL to the NHL. Yup, sounds like a lazy, malcontent to me. I think he has every right to feel bitter about what happened and apparently going after Bertuzzi is how he'll settle that issue. A lawsuit for damages? Unheard of really. Where do these crazy Canadians come up with these wacky schemes?
Has 44 tried hiding any assets recently?
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
dhabums wrote: I know lots of people want (errrr, NEED) to paint Moore as a guy looking for the easy way out.
*looks at mods*
PERSONAL ATTACK, PERSONAL ATTACK!!!
Seriously though: Some people NEED to see themselves as the only truly unbiased Canuck fan out there.
Steve Moore is a weasel....
I remember reading... long time ago... that Moore & Co were claiming Bert was putting assets into his wife's name.dhabums wrote: Has 44 tried hiding any assets recently?
Todd Bertuzzi is a weasel.....
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
I think it was property in ON somewhere. I'm sure it could be googled.Strangelove wrote: I remember reading... long time ago... that Moore & Co were claiming Bert was putting assets into his wife's name.
Todd Bertuzzi is a weasel.....
Re: Bertuzzi/Moore
Coco_Canuck, welcome to the site, and let me clarify something.
This site IS different than Canucks Central, always has been. When Central folded and their users descended here they were told that Central's open policy, which in the end was the architect of it's demise, won't be acceptable here. There are some big shots being taken at posters, and I'm not going to tolerate it.
I guess what I am saying is this is CanucksCorner and you came to our house. It's up to all of you if you want to be part of what we've created here. We didn't have these issues before Central closed.
I want everyone to get along. I makes my life a whole lot easier and makes the board better for everyone. If not I have no problem punting the people that don't want to respect my visions for this site. I pay the bills, it's my house....not toomuch to ask I don't think.
This site IS different than Canucks Central, always has been. When Central folded and their users descended here they were told that Central's open policy, which in the end was the architect of it's demise, won't be acceptable here. There are some big shots being taken at posters, and I'm not going to tolerate it.
I guess what I am saying is this is CanucksCorner and you came to our house. It's up to all of you if you want to be part of what we've created here. We didn't have these issues before Central closed.
I want everyone to get along. I makes my life a whole lot easier and makes the board better for everyone. If not I have no problem punting the people that don't want to respect my visions for this site. I pay the bills, it's my house....not toomuch to ask I don't think.