Tciso wrote:ukcanuck wrote:I am only guessing myself but since Moore's lawsuit includes the Canucks, Brian Burke, Marc Crawford and Bertuzzi, I'm thinking that Moore has to prove there was more than a wild punch that had catastrophic consequences, he has to show that it was premeditated and each of the defendants contributed to an attack that left him in a reduced capacity. I don't think that it matters what exact moment did the damage, the punch or the dog pile immediately after would just be the gun, its who pulled the trigger that is what Moore needs to show so that he can get damages from them.
At the end of the day, if I am the judge I would hold my nose, take into account what a comparable player would make in an average year and factor out an average career (5 yrs) and tag each defendant with the bill.
The guy was 26, making league minimum, or close to it ($425k), and had 12 points in 68 games. Given the lockout, he would have been lucky to sign another contract at any level. I don't know what he received so far, but I can't see how anything more than $1mil can be justified, as that would likely be way more then he would ever earn playing another 3 or 4 years in Europe or other 2nd tier hockey league. Ad in 50 bucks for pain ans suffering, and take away 6 bucks for being an ass leaves it at a cool $1,000,044 total.
Dan Hinote played 3 more years, is older and put up similar numbers and got $1M a year in the CAP era. I am not comparing the two players really, but seeing as they were on the same team, played the same number of games and had the same number of points I found it slightly amusing.
Then of course there is the rest of his life. Hmmm, a Harvard grad, parents are both lawyers, maybe he gets a job at McDonalds in Scarborough? Or maybe law school. Maybe he makes $500-700K a year for 20 more years. This of course depends on just how bad his PCS. And a whole bunch of other things.
I know lots of people want (errrr, NEED) to paint Moore as a guy looking for the easy way out. I can't say I get where that idea comes from. The guy works hard enough to get into Harvard and graduate while playing hockey. He then works his way from the AHL to the NHL. Yup, sounds like a lazy, malcontent to me. I think he has every right to feel bitter about what happened and apparently going after Bertuzzi is how he'll settle that issue. A lawsuit for damages? Unheard of really. Where do these crazy Canadians come up with these wacky schemes?
Has 44 tried hiding any assets recently?