Topper wrote:Arachnid wrote:Could we have done any worse with Cody in the line up in Game 7?
sagebrush wrote:He would progress faster on the 1st & 2nd lines, but that probably isn't best for the team at this point. There are compromises to be made.
ClamRussel wrote:The kid needs icetime and loads of it.
sagebrush wrote:ClamRussel wrote:The kid needs icetime and loads of it.
Ideally, I would like to see him get lots of ice time - say 15min a game or more, with the Canucks.
That isn't going to happen on the 4th line alone. Difficult to get with a coach as conservative as AV.
Cody has the calm disposition that allows you to grow while dealing with more pressure than some could handle. Kind of like Tanev, but with more upside. Look forward to seeing them both both grow.
nucksin7 wrote:I like Hodgson, but if there is no room for him & he needs to be traded, then I want a prospect of equal or greater value who plays the wing. example: Evander Kane. Somebody young who is just cracking the NHL lineup & has a terrible amount of skill & upside. Otherwise its just not worth it to move him yet, cause he will be good. No doubt.
Uncle dans leg wrote:CoHo is one injury removed from being one of the top rated prospects in the game. I think hitting the panic button with his development would be a dramatically bad premature ejaculation of a quality young up and coming centre.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], vic, Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests