ClamRussel wrote:They could even empower the linesmen to make calls on blatant infractions behind the play
Cornuck wrote:ClamRussel wrote:They could even empower the linesmen to make calls on blatant infractions behind the play
The double minor to Ehrhoff was called by a Linesman after the fact. The Refs didn't see it, but when the Shark went off bleeding and there was a stoppage soon after he was hit with the stick, the call was made after the Linesman told the refs that he saw it. I hadn't seen that before, but I guess it's in the rule book.
ClamRussel wrote:Yes Lu was weak
Yes the refs sucked shit (more proof the 2 ref system as it currently is...does not work)
BUT the Canucks need to play more than 20 minutes.
Canucks deserved to lose tonight and, much like game 2 in the Nashville series, the best team ended up winning.
Island Nucklehead wrote:ClamRussel wrote:Yes Lu was weak
Pretty much agree, except for the Luongo bit. He made some great saves and you can't give the Sharks that many PP's. We were LUCKY the only got 4 goals on us. The point shot was a pretty weak one, but IIRC it was a 5 on 3.
Linden Is God wrote: San Jose looked really good in the first, but from there, I don't think they dominated. I still say Canucks in 6.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests