Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:46 pm
Lauren Southern video on fake news :
Talking Canucks Hockey Since 1996
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9618
It's water vapour that forms when hot air from the jet engines mixes with the surrounding cold air.griz wrote: Do you believe that chemtrails aren't real?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtra ... acy_theoryExperts on atmospheric phenomena say chemtrails do not exist, and that the characteristics attributed to them are simply features of contrails responding differently in diverse conditions in terms of the sunlight, temperature, horizontal and vertical wind shear, and humidity levels present at the aircraft's altitude. In the US, the gridlike nature of the National Airspace System's flight lanes tends to cause crosshatched contrails, and in general it is hard to discern from the ground whether overlapping contrails are at similar altitudes or not. The jointly published fact sheet produced by NASA, the EPA, the FAA, and NOAA in 2000 in response to alarms over chemtrails details the science of contrail formation, and outlines both the known and potential impacts contrails have on temperature and climate.[18] The USAF produced a fact sheet as well that described these contrail phenomena as observed and analyzed since at least 1953. It also rebutted chemtrail theories more directly by identifying the theories as a hoax and disproving the existence of chemtrails.
Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist with NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, is quoted in USA Today as saying that logic does not dissuade most chemtrail proponents: "If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it's, 'Well, you're just part of the conspiracy'," he said.
Analysis of the use of commercial aircraft tracks for climate engineering has shown them to be generally unsuitable.
Astronomer Bob Berman has characterized the chemtrail conspiracy theory as a classic example of failure to apply Occam's razor, writing in 2009 that instead of adopting the long-established "simple solution" that the trails consist of frozen water vapour, "the conspiracy web sites think the phenomenon started only a decade ago and involves an evil scheme in which 40,000 commercial pilots and air traffic controllers are in on the plot to poison their own children."
Seeing the words "Alex Jones" and "he often does get things right which history has proven" so close together gave me more autism then Thiomersal ever will.griz wrote:Which views are you at odds with BB?BurningBeard wrote:How much Thiomersal have you ingested to hold these views?
On a global level, you are right, but it depends which "we" you are talking about. For a North American working class white male (in general -- not just coal miners), living standards and financial prospects were better forty years ago. What most of them fail to recognize is that this is a result of the the restructuring of the relationship between labour and capital and the general dissolution of the social contract in the Reagan/Thatcher/Mulroney years. Automation and the export of manufacturing to China haven't done them any favours, either.Per wrote:The general trend though is that almost everything is getting better. We live longer, with a better living standard, we are better educated than ever before, poverty and child mortality has never been lower, literacy never higher.
Eventhough Syria is a mess right now, the number of armed conflicts and the number of people killed in armed conflicts has fallen over the centuries and is at an all time low.
This is a golden age, but most people have no clue to this and actually think things used to be better. It's weird.
https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of ... -5-charts/
I agree with much of this but I live in The Evil Empire and there is anger against SOMETHING. It seems the idea of being American is being challenged by globalization. A man cannot get by with just hard work in most cases. My Dad raised four of us as a welder for the first decade. Had a home and usually enough to eat. It is hard for folks who remember the 50's and 60's. There seemed to be so much more promise. It may be a golden age but for very few. The rest of us are being slowly processed into Vonnegut's Reeks and Recks or as McLuhan called it, a leisure class. There is plenty to watch and mainly enough to eat but American men feel ripped off. I suspect it is their dignity that they are pissed about. Nothing a good war won't fix eh?Per wrote:I think one of the main reasons we see a backlash against the liberal ideals of the enlightenment, and people actually reverting back to narrow-minded nationalism and protectionism is because many people suffer from the delusion that things are getting worse, even though objectively things are better than they have ever been, and still improving.
Sure, if you happen to be working in eg coal mining, prospects do look slim. It's a dying industry that is being replaced by better options, but this us nothing new. There are lots of trades and professions that have disappeared over time as society changes. We are going through a period of major technology shifts, so those who are stuck in obsolete trades need to adapt and move to fields with greater opportunities.
The general trend though is that almost everything is getting better. We live longer, with a better living standard, we are better educated than ever before, poverty and child mortality has never been lower, literacy never higher.
Eventhough Syria is a mess right now, the number of armed conflicts and the number of people killed in armed conflicts has fallen over the centuries and is at an all time low.
This is a golden age, but most people have no clue to this and actually think things used to be better. It's weird.
https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of ... -5-charts/