RoyalDude wrote:I'm trying, believe me, I'm tryting
yeah, we need Kesler to be a monster again. This team was at it's best when he was on, gave the other team fits in line matching. I have no problem with the Sedins game right now, although I don't think they are as dominant as they were a couple seasons ago in that Cup run season etc. It was a Kesler where it didn't matter who he was playing with, his line rolled but now, not sure if it's this seemingly problem of trying to find the right chemistry in line-mates for him to play with. Booth and Kesler do not click, there is no sustained pressure with those two, cause they can't seemingly sustain the play in the offensive zone, this may be due to Booth not being a puck possession player and all he wants to do is put the Taylor Hall blinders on and try to drive through 3 opposing players to the net. I think the 2nd line woes has more to do with Kesler than his linemates. Kes needs to get back on top of his game. He is paid too much and knows what to do to have to sit and wait for his arrival throwing the excuse book at him. The time is now!
Right now Garrison looks to be way overpaid! If you are making those kinds of bucks you best damn well start showing why you are being paid those kind of bucks. That's near elite player dough he is getting.
Ok, so I'm gonna trash a couple things to start.....just so things feel somewhat the same around here.
First off, harping on a lack of chemistry between Kesler and Booth after Booth's first game back would be bad enough. To do so after a game in which they weren't even on the same line is just retarded. Booth was on a line with Weise and Lapierre. So for Booth to be clicking with Kesler would take some incredible talent on both their parts.....something that far surpasses the Sedin's twin thing....
You are right about Garrison, but I think the majority of his problems are the fault of the coaching. He's not being used effectively on the PP, and the system that Vigneault coaches is night and day different than what he would have been used to in the East, especially on a team like the Panthers. He comes from a team that wheels and deals more, and has a more organic approach to their attack in the offensive zone. The Canucks are rigid and structured with their cycle game, and the defenseman don't create on their own, they pinch, but only down the wall, they aren't supposed to get open apparently, but rather stay at the point and wait for the Sedins to make up their mind what they want to do before hurrying a bad pass back to the point.
You are right about Kesler needing to be the monster we saw in 2011. But that won't happen until he is being used effectively. Kesler's "problem" is less due to chemistry than it is to being in the right role. Kesler needs to be the guy that is out there to shut down the opposing team's top line, to pressure on the forecheck and generate off of turnovers. He's the guy that needs to be disrupting the point men and rushing the puck on turnovers at our blueline. He can get extra points on the PP with the Sedins. After all, Kesler is a guy that had his best year points-wise the same year that he won the Selke. Since then Vigneault figures it is best to use him as the pivot on a second scoring unit. Not going to happen. I would love to see a line of Booth-Kesler-Burrows. It would give opponents fits. Bur and Kes already shutdown mots PP's when they are on their game together. Add Booth to help and to be a presence on a rush and I think all 3 of them have great years. I'm fairly confident that it would be a 90 goal line. This means Kassian back up with the Sedins though. So who knows if it will happen, and whoever pointed it out yesterday is right, the Sedins with Burrows have combined for 14 points in the last 3 games (or is it 4?). You don't really want to mess with that right now.