by alexBF on Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:42 pm
You're right Nash did have a solid Olympic run on a line with Crosby and Iginla. He's not going to have those linemates here (or anywhere outside of Team Canada). He was also taken off that line and replaced with Staal though.
I don't think I'd use an example of his prowess a 7 game window of olympic hockey where he was such an amazing standout that he was outscored by his nine of his teammates (Toews, iginla, crosby, heatley, getzlaf, weber, staal, keith, and perry) and tied 2 more (marleau, richards). I'm being kind and ignoring his 1 assist/point in his previous olympics because 2 goals and 4 assists in 13 games isn't impressive.
Edler had an off year this year in the playoffs, last year he was very good in the first few rounds. But Nash has 1 career playoff goal while getting swept 4 years ago, so he's not exactly impressive there either.
I think a lot of GMs WOULD trade Rick Nash at 7.8million (BACK LOADED) contract for Edler's 3.25mill contract. With the difference you could upgrade a $2.5mill forward (raymond, malhotra?) for a $7million foward (Parise?)
Nash and his contract are not appealing. People like to complain about Luongo's contract but it's $2.5million cheaper for a goalie that has statistically been top 10 (arguably top 3) for the past many seasons. While Nash barely squeezed into the top 60 statically last season coming in at 59th for points (and -19, 30th best on HIS TEAM). Gillis would be insane to trade for Nash. If you think the canucks' window is NOW, then keep Edler and with that $4.5million of extra dollars that you seem to have in cap space you can sign a Parise level crazy 1 year contract and dump raymond or malhotra.
Nash is a terrible fit for the canucks, unless his contract magically changes.