GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Moderator: Referees
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Holy fuck Bieksa...
Right now, I think it's 50% good shifts and 50% sloppy shifts.
Tampa's not exactly playing great hockey and the Nucks are still screwing it up.
Right now, I think it's 50% good shifts and 50% sloppy shifts.
Tampa's not exactly playing great hockey and the Nucks are still screwing it up.
- tantalum
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:41 am
- Location: Carl Junction, MO
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Canucks are just driving Schneider's value to the bolts up. Have to think about the future you know.
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Wow were the Sedins ever punked on that shift.
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Canuck best line so far?
Manny, Duco and Weise.
Surprisingly.
Manny, Duco and Weise.
Surprisingly.
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Winning 4-2?????? Sounds like we are losing 4-2... what's manny doing? Improving?
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
- newcanuckfan
- CC Veteran
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:31 am
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Well, they're certainly making it tough on themselves again tonight.
Let's hope they find it in them to bear down and hang on for the 2 points.
Let's hope they find it in them to bear down and hang on for the 2 points.
- newcanuckfan
- CC Veteran
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:31 am
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Brutal. They just don't have the shit to put games away.
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Canucks are looking absolutely horrible.
I don't really know what to make of this.
Giving up a 2 goal lead?
I don't really know what to make of this.
Giving up a 2 goal lead?
- Southern_Canuck
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:27 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Mike Murphy asks, "Was this against the Kings? No?"
"Well then, although there was no distinct kicking motion, there was a kicking motion - but because I am a corrupt NHL official that reports to Colin Campbell, I will say this is a good goal."
S_C
"Well then, although there was no distinct kicking motion, there was a kicking motion - but because I am a corrupt NHL official that reports to Colin Campbell, I will say this is a good goal."
S_C
Last edited by Southern_Canuck on Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
It's a great day for hockey!
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
At least we're not giving away points in our own conference.
FUCK.
What an anticlimactic road trip. Even if we win this game, I won't be happy.
FUCK.
What an anticlimactic road trip. Even if we win this game, I won't be happy.
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Would you rather have lost to Boston and beat both fla teams? Smart money says yah, heart says..fuck Boston..
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
-
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:30 am
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Well,that was a tired team hanging on. They didn't deserve the win the way they played in the 3rd, but they got through it. But man, were they ever off. They better get their air by the time they play St. Louis. They'll get crushed if they don't. Take the 2 points and hike on out of town. And boys...get some sleep!
Is Guy Boucher actually insane? He looks crackers on that bench.
Is Guy Boucher actually insane? He looks crackers on that bench.
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 19135
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
We looked tired in the third. But the twins looked like men against boys but no finish. It is frustrating to watch them blow 3, 2 goal leads like that but getting the SO win is important. Keeps us up on Minny and starts to be distance between us and the rest of the West. Unfortunately with all the teams in the East close behind with a zillion games in hand holding onto the league lead will be difficult. But I'll take it.
It really does show you that we are not that deep on defence with quality D'men. With Salo out it really really shows. Hopefully he won't be gone for long. Even with Rome back soon we still do not have the quality depth we will need to get through. Mg needs to seriously think about upgrading the backend somehow.
The guys looked tired and I do think that the Boston game took a lot out of them physically and emotionally. But a game against St. Louis for the Conference lead should be an important one to them. A regulation win we go up by 5 points, a loss and they are only 1 point back.
It really does show you that we are not that deep on defence with quality D'men. With Salo out it really really shows. Hopefully he won't be gone for long. Even with Rome back soon we still do not have the quality depth we will need to get through. Mg needs to seriously think about upgrading the backend somehow.
The guys looked tired and I do think that the Boston game took a lot out of them physically and emotionally. But a game against St. Louis for the Conference lead should be an important one to them. A regulation win we go up by 5 points, a loss and they are only 1 point back.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
Or better yet....beat Boston and win one and lose one in Florida...yah fucking eh.
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 28993
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: GDT: Jan 10: Canucks @ Lightning - 4:30pm SNet-P
When 3 of your defenseman have the names Ballard, Sulzer and Alberts, that just ain't good at all.
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau