GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADIO: 1

This forum is to discuss game day happenings. New threads will be posted for each game.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
User avatar
Rumsfeld
CC Legend
Posts: 4171
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:48 pm
Location: Raqqa

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Rumsfeld » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:07 pm

Wow. Hammer and Cody have been playing pass all night. Big goal.
Chairman of the Jim Benning Appreciation Society

dbr
CC Legend
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by dbr » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:08 pm

Good night for Hodgson so far.

User avatar
newcanuckfan
CC Veteran
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:31 am

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by newcanuckfan » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:12 pm

Rumsfeld wrote:
Eddy Punch Clock wrote:At this point I am way more concerned about someone eventually sending a message to Methot than the actual two points.

I'd rather a message be sent and lose this game than win it and nothing be done about that hit.

But Maclean may be right... it's probably too late at this point.
It's definitely not too late. And MacLean is almost never right.
Exactly...at least make an attempt to change the book on you before it gets out of hand. Frankly I don't know how they continue to be so patient and turn the other cheek.

User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 8312
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by rats19 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:19 pm

Thats how you didle the clitsome..
You are who you hang with.....

User avatar
dhabums
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by dhabums » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:25 pm

Any word that ends is "est" is a compliment.

As for as I am concerned, running into the goalie is trying to instigate something. I hope the league NEVER decides to penalize a team for defending their goalie. Otherwise, it is goalie hunting season. Run the goalie, get into a fight and come out ahead.

Hank
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2170
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Hank » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:26 pm

Cody gets a lot of grief but he's outplayed the two old men on both ends of the ice and he's got the tougher position.

User avatar
dhabums
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by dhabums » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Mondi wrote: And yeah, I see your point. I just don't think Burrows was running Mason.
I totally agree, but I don't know what Russell saw other than his goalie down, Burrows on him, on the refs arm up.

User avatar
Southern_Canuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Southern_Canuck » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:48 pm

Hodgson with a career high 14:30, I think - good for him to get a goal.

Higgins had a tough game - bobbled the puck on a zone clear that led to Columbus' first goal, cleared the puck over the glass for a delay of game, and fumbled a partial break that I thought he was going to turn into a breakaway. But he did get in front of the net and score.

S_C
It's a great day for hockey!

User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 8312
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by rats19 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:34 pm

Ballard is different than last year,healthier better different.
Silent 3 worked hard and was rewarded
Burrows go the wiiner, fought..kindof
Hank is an ironman
Malholtra was better
Shneider was good..lateraly..twice as fast as lu
Edler and salo need to lay out a few howitzers ...every game
Bieksa and hamhuis were good
Lappy and higgins and sturm need to pick it up.....they wi
Weise seemed ok..couple shots,some hustle
Sammy is not in his groove..he will be at some point

Tanev will be awesome
Hansen is hansen
Daniel is daniel
Volpati....

Good 2pts.2nd game and i am yelling"fuckin rights"
Last edited by rats19 on Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You are who you hang with.....

User avatar
darren
CC Veteran
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:45 am

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by darren » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:41 pm

Mondi wrote:Erhoff > Tanev
Ballard < Ballard
Kesler > Hodgson
Torres > Weise
Raymond > Sturm
Rome > Volpatti
Fixed your post.

Hank
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2170
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Hank » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:24 pm

darren wrote:
Mondi wrote: Torres > Weise
Raymond > Sturm
Rome > Volpatti
Fixed your post.
Hey Darren, I know it's still early in the season but the above really causes me some concerns.

Pinizotto > Oreo > Horseface Weise
Raymond's back > Sturm's knees
Aaron Vigneault > Aaron Volpatti
Point Sami > Point Sammy
Puck-shooting Sammy > Puck-hogging Sammy
Fighting Burrows > Biting Burrows
Shootouts > Lui
Emergency Response to assault victims > Canuck team toughness response to assault victim

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 17134
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Strangelove » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:42 pm

Southern_Canuck wrote: Hodgson with a career high 14:30, I think
Actually he had 16 minutes in Game One.
Southern_Canuck wrote: Higgins... bobbled the puck on a zone clear that led to Columbus' first goal.
That's what everyone keeps saying, but i could've sworn he got the puck to Ballard, who failed to get the puck out???
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 17134
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Strangelove » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:44 pm

dhabums wrote:Bieksa goes out of his way to throw a hit and we get scored on.
He was going after Nash, I figured he was trying to dish out a little payback for the Sedin hit.

Didn't work out too well, but hey this team is kinda new at payback. :lol:

Still, Ginger definitely should've had that covered. Bad goal!
Last edited by Strangelove on Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 17134
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Strangelove » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:51 pm

Burrows was great tonight, Hodgson & Manny were better.

Wingers Sturm & Samuelsson, Volpatti & Weise crappy. Again.

Second not-so-stellar game in a row for young Tanev.

Schneids looked shaky.

Hamhuis with another great game.

Salo with another solid game.

Higgins with another solid game.

Everyone else was very meh I thought.

Good thing we were playing a crap team tonight!

I’ve been saying since June the book on Canucks is to take shots at their stars.

Henrik is not likely to keep his ironman streak going all season with this kind of abuse.

This team will get PUNISHED on Wednesday in Philly.
____
GO CANUCKS GO!!!

User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3214
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: GDT: Oct 10 - Canucks @ Columbus - 4pm - SNET-P(HD) RADI

Post by Jovocop » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:51 pm

rats19 wrote: Lappy and higgins and sturm need to pick it up.....they wi

Volpati....
Both Lappy and Higgins have been pretty good so far. Sturm and Samuelsson need to pick up their games. As for Volpatti, can anyone explain why he is still with the team?? He could not score, make plays, nor hitting. The worst of all, he did not fight when Henrik was hit from behind... I am not sure whether AV has a leash on Weise and Volpatti or not. If that is the case, why can't the Canucks get some actually players then...??? :evil:

Post Reply