GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

This forum is to discuss game day happenings. New threads will be posted for each game.

Moderator: Referees

GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby Cornuck » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:05 am

Two teams celebrating 40 years in the league. This is only time we meet up this season. Anyone know if both teams are going vintage?

This is game 4 out of 5 on the road trip, and another case where we might take them too lightly. This will be the return of Torres to Buffalo and fan reaction should be interesting.

Edit: Schneider gets the start

NHL.com Preview

THN.com Tale of the Tape

Canucks.com Game Notes

GO CANUCKS GO!
Over 40 years of pain - I just want one day of glory.
User avatar
Cornuck
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
 
Posts: 4891
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Chester, NE

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby the toucan kid » Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Salvaged a point I guess. Not sure why I can't get into the games this season. I guess I'm just in a drowse until April I guess.
User avatar
the toucan kid
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3838
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:50 am

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby Robert » Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:55 pm

A far far greater game then the dogs breakfast in toronto. I was embarrassed to be a Canucks fan that night, tonight not so much. Nice action tonight. 8-)
User avatar
Robert
MVP
MVP
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: Burnaby

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby the toucan kid » Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:35 am

Slightly concerned about Gillis' two new D-men, although an early season injury can take quite a while to overcome in terms of getting ones game together.
User avatar
the toucan kid
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3838
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:50 am

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby Island Nucklehead » Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:35 am

the toucan kid wrote:Slightly concerned about Gillis' two new D-men, although an early season injury can take quite a while to overcome in terms of getting ones game together.


Our road game should be more worrisome. I guess having the backup get us points on a consistent basis is a good thing, but we need a good home AND road record.

Hamhuis' giveway was atrocious. I gotta believe that's a once in a while brainfart you'd get with any D..... because that's beer league stuff.
User avatar
Island Nucklehead
CC Legend
 
Posts: 4273
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby nucklehead_88 » Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:56 am

the toucan kid wrote:Slightly concerned about Gillis' two new D-men, although an early season injury can take quite a while to overcome in terms of getting ones game together.




for one giveaway? Hammer has been solid up until that point, and for Ballard? If you ask me, he's being sat for no reason at all. Rome and AHLberts have been "meh" at best.
"HE WILL PLAY, YOU KNOW HE'LL PLAY, HE'LL PLAY ON CRUTCHES...."

Jim Robson
User avatar
nucklehead_88
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Maple Ridge B.C.

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby woodhog » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:08 pm

nucklehead_88 wrote:
the toucan kid wrote:Slightly concerned about Gillis' two new D-men, although an early season injury can take quite a while to overcome in terms of getting ones game together.




for one giveaway? Hammer has been solid up until that point, and for Ballard? If you ask me, he's being sat for no reason at all. Rome and AHLberts have been "meh" at best.



Agreed nuckle88. Hamhuis has been very good. The puck was bouncing a bit and he didn't get good wood on it on the turn-over. Just bad luck.
As for Ballard, I'm surprized that he's sat for so many games. Unless there is an injury, I don't see why he's not back in the line up. Alberts has had games with bad penalties and turn-overs, making him a good candidate for the press box.
I expect to see Ballard back within the next couple of games, maybe in Pittsburgh.
User avatar
woodhog
CC 1st Team All-Star
 
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:31 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby the toucan kid » Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:45 pm


for one giveaway? Hammer has been solid up until that point, and for Ballard? If you ask me, he's being sat for no reason at all. Rome and AHLberts have been "meh" at best.


Gave up another almost as bad against Ottawa. I'm not all that worried, I write it off to overcoming an early season injury, but neither has looked too good to me. I have no question they'll be at par by when we need them.
User avatar
the toucan kid
CC Legend
 
Posts: 3838
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:50 am

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby dr.dork » Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:15 pm

the toucan kid wrote:

for one giveaway? Hammer has been solid up until that point, and for Ballard? If you ask me, he's being sat for no reason at all. Rome and AHLberts have been "meh" at best.


Gave up another almost as bad against Ottawa. I'm not all that worried, I write it off to overcoming an early season injury, but neither has looked too good to me. I have no question they'll be at par by when we need them.


Both were slowed by injury, but haven't been overly impressive either. Time will tell, but I think long term both will be fine.

But that was a brutal giveaway no matter which way you slice it. Puck rolling or not, he gave it right too Myers in front. (What Myers was doing there is perhaps a good question, but it wasn't like he would be hard to miss at 6 foot 13 inches).

As far as the D goes and in terms of defensive errors, Edler has been much better than last year and Bieksa has been better recently. And Rome and Alberts have been very good recently, especially considering their contracts. Rome has been much steadier and his mistakes in hos own end are way down. Alberts too.
dr.dork
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1771
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby LotusBlossom » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:46 am

The Canucks got they deserved, one point. That one giveaway in OT doesn't reflect on how solid Hamhuis has been for the Canucks, but unfortunately for him, the bandwagon will be asking him to sit instead of Ballard.

An observation:

Since Cornuck brought up that both teams had their 40th year in the league up, I honestly thought the Sabres would have done something more with their expansion twins, but I was very disappointed they didn't.

If the game was in Vancouver, I am willing to put money that the Canucks organization would have made a bigger deal out of both teams turning 40.
Didn't you know?I'm Front Page news! ;)
User avatar
LotusBlossom
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
 
Posts: 2448
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Metro Vancouver

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby Tciso » Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:20 am

Island Nucklehead wrote:
the toucan kid wrote:Slightly concerned about Gillis' two new D-men, although an early season injury can take quite a while to overcome in terms of getting ones game together.


Our road game should be more worrisome. I guess having the backup get us points on a consistent basis is a good thing, but we need a good home AND road record.

Hamhuis' giveway was atrocious. I gotta believe that's a once in a while brainfart you'd get with any D..... because that's beer league stuff.


I forgive him on that giveaway. THe puck was bouncing like crazy, and he batted it away, hopefully to safety. It was an unlucky bounce. Yes, he could have tried to eat the puck, but he was being pressured pretty heavily, and didn't have a good opportunity to bounce the puck towards the boards. Where was his puck-supporting forward is a good question.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Tciso
CC Hall of Fan Member
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: GDT: Canucks @ Buffalo - 4pm - Snet-P

Postby Robert » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:47 am

The game was pretty damn fast at that point, buffalo did have a lot of luck going in that game and a good soccer type stop of that pass didn't surprise me. I'm more happy with their effort than being bummed at lossing the point in ot.

Lotus - wouldn't it have been up to the Canucks to help out in that regard; like maybe bring their original uniforms?
User avatar
Robert
MVP
MVP
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:02 am
Location: Burnaby


Return to Game Day Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: herb, Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest