And risk a broken hand? For what? A meaningless game?
We are already down a primary D-man.
Good move KB
Save it for the 3 month war coming up...
Moderator: Referees
Bieksa is a shell of his former self and this just proved it to me.

the toucan kid wrote:Bieksa is a shell of his former self and this just proved it to me.
I think you're splitting hairs big time on the fighting thing, but Bieksa has been a shell for quite some time.
Cornuck wrote:Clam - I agree 100% with your post.
I was thinking before the game that a good plan would have been to take an instigator against anyone who got in the crease. When I saw that late hit - I thought "Ok - send a message". In stead, just some glares and nothing to back them up.
Of course I am, but its the game within the game TC. Bieksa *could* play a similar role to Seabrook for us, but he doesn't and never will by the looks of things. I really think he has similar potential to Seabrook, in fact he's put up better numbers and is tougher but it looks like he'll end up following the footsteps of Special Ed and continue to be a high risk/mental mistake riddled coulda-been for the rest of his career. Not that he's as good Jovo but Ed never lived up to his potential although he did have some solid years here. As it is, Bieksa isn't even close to being in the same category as Seabrook or Jovo which is a shame. Don't even get me started on the leadership angle.
it's like the people complaining about Henrik still not shooting enough.
For crying out loud, he has 29 freaking goals.
the toucan kid wrote:Of course I am, but its the game within the game TC. Bieksa *could* play a similar role to Seabrook for us, but he doesn't and never will by the looks of things. I really think he has similar potential to Seabrook, in fact he's put up better numbers and is tougher but it looks like he'll end up following the footsteps of Special Ed and continue to be a high risk/mental mistake riddled coulda-been for the rest of his career. Not that he's as good Jovo but Ed never lived up to his potential although he did have some solid years here. As it is, Bieksa isn't even close to being in the same category as Seabrook or Jovo which is a shame. Don't even get me started on the leadership angle.
Hmm I never saw Bieksa as potential, certainly not that kind. I saw him as an overachiever from whom we were lucky to get what we got. Too bad the well is dry, but to get what we have from him is still something. I doubt he was ever going to be a great D man, or that he ever really had it in him.
ClamRussel wrote:Really?
Interesting how Seabrook got into a scrap tonight in another "meaningless" game as they'll finish first overall and St. Louis is out of the playoffs. Suffice its safe to say Seabrook is both a much better defenceman and more important to his team than Bieksa is to the Canucks....I don't think Bam Bam will be getting any invites to Team Canada anytime soon unless its that end of year "world championship" and the Canucks have been dispatched from the first round. Like the Canucks, the Blackhawks are also suffering from blueline woes as Campbell is basically done for the year. Also, Seabrook is just coming off a concussion and fighting is probably not a great idea...
So why would he scrap a week before playoffs start?
Well perhaps its more indicative of why Chicago is a better team than the Canucks and why they pounded them in game 6 of last year's playoffs. I guaranfreakintee it that if that same Demitra hit was on a Blackhawk that there would have been fisticuffs and perhaps more. We'll see which team goes farther in the playoffs this year.
Trust me, I'm no advocate of fighting and senseless violence...in fact I'm 100% opposed to the ol' premeditated goon vs goon scraps that are still too common....but this is a case where Galiardi crossed the line and got away with it. He should have paid a price and going w/ Bieksa at least would have held him accountable and sent the right message. What if Demitra was hurt on the play? Its inconsequential that he wasn't hurt...he could have been and missed playoff games for us; the guy is injury prone and just coming off multiple shoulder surgeries....it is NOT ok to run him from behind after the whistle LATE when the player had all the time in the world to let up. Or is it ok? Guess so.
Bieksa is a shell of his former self and this just proved it to me.
ClamRussel wrote:Bieksa is a shell of his former self and this just proved it to m

LotusBlossom wrote:... this would have been a perfect time for Bieksa to drop'em, even if it was a bit of a dance. Why risk it?ClamRussel wrote:Bieksa is a shell of his former self and this just proved it to m
Because he hasn't been charged up enough since he got back. Which also points to he hasn't had a season to get him into playoff-mode.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest