Schneids is stoning us, time for that chant...Uncle dans leg wrote:Where the goals?!? Doc comes back and the offense dries up... conspiracy!
GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Moderator: Referees
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
It’s coming.
Seriously Vanek, tonight he was noticeable for the wrong reason.
Seriously Vanek, tonight he was noticeable for the wrong reason.
- Carl Yagro
- MVP
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
- Location: On wide shoulders...
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Vanek should not be allowed to pass on the powerplay
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16113
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Well that sucks. We played another great game. But we've lost that scoring touch. Cory was great this game, like Bishop the last game. Can't complain about the effort though. Fun to watch but without a result.
The only HW the Canucks need
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16113
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
He makes these nifty little plays then makes a stupid pass.Reefer2 wrote:It’s coming.
Seriously Vanek, tonight he was noticeable for the wrong reason.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Gingersnaps our point streak...
If this were a just world, we would earned at a point.
If this were a just world, we would earned at a point.
Doc: "BTW, Donny was right, you're smug."
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 12921
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
My take is the defense isn't enough of a threat. They need someone back there with a cannon and/or the ability to get quick shots on net through the traffic. How many passes to open d-men were there to have dribblers blocked or passes deflected?
Pretty dramatic change from last year and it surely is coaching. Fuckin twitcher I knew that clipboard clutching was for lack of confidence
Pretty dramatic change from last year and it surely is coaching. Fuckin twitcher I knew that clipboard clutching was for lack of confidence
If you need air...call it in
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 28122
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Gotta admit a part of me... may... have been cheering for my pool team.Uncle dans leg wrote:Where the goals?!? Doc comes back and the offense dries up... conspiracy!
(bonus points for shutout)
But hey let's blame the schedulers for sending the devils to town at Halloween!
Not to deflect or be superstitious or anything...
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Great night for Corsi scores.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
This is where having one of Crosby/Malkin/Kessel would be nice, just a game breaking finisher to break a goalie's confidence - in time Boeser could be like Kessel, but that will come in time plus I don't think he's 100% yet.
But at least we peppered Schnieds with a shitload of shots.
But at least we peppered Schnieds with a shitload of shots.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Not that it helps us but Boeser cost the Devils by simply moving out of the way of a Johansson hit.
Keeps his eyes open like that and he'll be a good one.
More and more I see the road team out scouting the home team.
Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.
No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
Keeps his eyes open like that and he'll be a good one.
More and more I see the road team out scouting the home team.
Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.
No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
"evolution"
- Cookie La Rue
- MVP
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:57 pm
- Location: 50° 10' North / 8° 34' East
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
The shot was deflected by Tanev's back or butt. No way it was a softy.Hank wrote:Oh Marky... another soft Under Arm(or) goal.
"Every dog has its day." - CC Hockey Pool Champion 2004 & 2013 'Moves like Lenarduzzi'
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Good game but bad result ! Scneider was great or maybe even though we outshot them Markstrom just had bad luck on the goal. Still it was a fun game to watch. Young guns looking good and the D is better than I expected even without Edler. PP not effective. .
" If you cant beat them in the alley - you can't beat them on the ice
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
Whole hearted agreement on the coaching changes this year. Such breath of fresh air. Makes me smile when looking over at the coil and smelling a coaching change coming on over there.Uncle dans leg wrote:My take is the defense isn't enough of a threat. They need someone back there with a cannon and/or the ability to get quick shots on net through the traffic. How many passes to open d-men were there to have dribblers blocked or passes deflected?
Pretty dramatic change from last year and it surely is coaching. Fuckin twitcher I knew that clipboard clutching was for lack of confidence
- Carl Yagro
- MVP
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
- Location: On wide shoulders...
Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN
No, that shot was not deflected. You can say Tanev should have either blocked it or let Markstrom see it instead of being in no man's land and ending up being a screen.Cookie La Rue wrote:The shot was deflected by Tanev's back or butt. No way it was a softy.Hank wrote:Oh Marky... another soft Under Arm(or) goal.
This is a serious flaw that Markstrom still has not address: pucks going under his arms or glove. We've already seen countless softies just this season alone. He needs to calm down and move less.
Hey, it's easy to sit here and dissect but he is a professional goalie and that was a one-time slapper off the half-boards which he had plenty of time to track and be set for. But it went between his arm... once again.
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!